Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The pitfalls of Darwinian “progress”. A comment on “Evolvability and progress in evolutionary economics” by Tim Cochrane and James Maclaurin

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boulding K. E. (1981) Evolutionary economics. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding K. E. (1991) What is evolutionary economics?. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bünstorf G. (2006) How useful is generalized Darwinism as a framework to study competition and industrial evolution?. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16: 511–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane T., Maclaurin J. (2012) Evolvability and progress in evolutionary economics. Journal of Bioeconomics 14: 101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordes C. (2006) Darwinism in economics: From analogy to continuity. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16: 529–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman D. M., McPherson M. S. (1996) Economic analysis and moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson G. M. (1999) Economics and utopia: Why the learning economy is not the end of history. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson G.M. (2002) Darwinism in economics: From analogy to continuity. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12(3): 259–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson G. M., Knudsen T. (2006) Why we need a generalized Darwinism, and why generalized Darwinism is not enough. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling A., Schulz N. (2009) Invisible wealth. Encounter Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne H. G. (1967) Our two corporation systems: Law and economics. Virginia Law Review 53: 259–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J., Szathmáry E. (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • North D. C. (1996) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, C. (forthcoming). How to evaluate creative destruction: Reconstructing Schumpeter’s approach. Cambridge Journal of Economics, in press.

  • Schumpeter J. A. (1928) The instability of capitalism. Economic Journal 38: 361–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1993) On the Darwinian View of Progress. Population and Development Review 19: 123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh J. C. J. M. (2007) Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17: 521–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Wright G. H. (1997) Progress: Fact and fiction. In: Mittelstrass J., Maclaughlin P., Burgen A. (Eds.), The idea of progress. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 1–18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. (1999) Bioeconomics as economics from a Darwinian perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics 1: 19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Schubert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schubert, C. The pitfalls of Darwinian “progress”. A comment on “Evolvability and progress in evolutionary economics” by Tim Cochrane and James Maclaurin. J Bioecon 15, 325–328 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-012-9146-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-012-9146-0

Keywords

Navigation