“Doing” Agency: Introductory Remarks on Methodology
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
As a theory of social reproduction, agency provides an attractive framework for understanding how material culture relates to everyday social action, to long-standing cultural institutions, and to wholesale culture change. What remains under-explored in archaeology is the question of how to proceed in linking observable material patterning to the agency of ancient social reproduction and how to understand the role of material culture in this dynamic process. This introduction (to this and the next issue of JAMT (Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory)) explores why there is a need for archaeology to develop explicitly articulated “middle range interpretive methodologies” that are appropriate for agency-oriented research in the past.
- Binford, L. R. (1964). A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity 29: 425–441.
- Clarke, D. (1973). Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity 47(185): 6–18.
- Dobres, M.-A. (2000). Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archae- ology, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
- Dobres, M.-A., and Robb, J. E. (2000). Agency in archaeology: paradigm or platitude? In Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 3–17.
- Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Harding, S. (1987). The method question. Hypatia 2(3): 19–35.
- Hegmon, M. (2003). Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity 68: 213–243.
- Hodder, I. (ed.) (1987). The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Redman, C. (1973). Multistage fieldwork and analytical techniques. American Antiquity 38: 61–79.
- Robb, J. E. (2005). The extended artifact and the monumental economy. In DeMarrais, E., Gosden, C., and Renfrew, C. (eds.), Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, pp. 131–139.
- Skibo, J. M., and Schiffer, M. B. (2001). Understanding artifact variability and change: A behavioral framework. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Anthropological Perspectives on Technology, Amerind Foundation and University of New Mexico Press, Dragoon and Albuquerque, pp. 139–149.
- Tilley, C. (1994). A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments, Berg, Oxford.
- Walker, W. H., and Lucero, L. J. (2000). The depositional history of ritual and power. In Dobres, M-A., and Robb, J. E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 130–147.
- Wylie, A. (1986). Bootstrapping in the un-natural sciences: an archaeological case. In Fine, A., and Machamer, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 314–322.
- Wylie, A. (1992). The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 57(1): 15–35.
- “Doing” Agency: Introductory Remarks on Methodology
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Volume 12, Issue 3 , pp 159-166
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- middle range interpretive methodologies
- social reproduction