Comparing patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS)
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study evaluated a questionnaire originally developed for use with health professionals to explore and compare patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of elective single embryo transfer and twin births.
IVF clinicians and patients attending an independent Fertility clinic were surveyed using the Attitudes to a twin birth scale (ATIPS) comprising two subscales: attitudes to twins (A-Twin) and attitudes to elective single embryo transfer (A-SET). After refinement total sample scores showed both subscales were reliable with Cronbach’s alpha >0.8 and item-total correlations >0.35.
Questionnaires were completed by 100 female IVF patients and 17 IVF clinicians. A-Twin subscale scores indicated neither the IVF clinicians nor female IVF patients demonstrated very positive attitudes to a twin birth although the IVF female patients were more in favour (t = 5.29, n = 117, p = <0.001). Responses suggest both groups would benefit from increased information about the risks of a twin birth for the baby. First cycle IVF female patients were significantly more positive about eSET (z = 3.94, n = 100, p = <0.001). Clinicians perceive both their colleagues’ and female patients’ negativity towards eSET; suggesting a role for education.
This study found the ATIPS to be a reliable measure which could be useful in evaluating interventions to promote single embryo transfer.
- National Statistics. Birth Statistics: Review of the Registrar General on births and patterns of family building in England and Wales 2006 Series FMI no 36. 2007 [cited 07.07.2009]; Available from: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/FM1_36/FM1-No36.pdf.
- Hamilton BE et al. Annual Summary of Vital Statistics. Pediatrics. 2005;119(2):345–60. CrossRef
- Beemsterboer SN et al. The paradox of declining fertility but increasing twinning rates with advancing maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(6):1531–2. CrossRef
- Pinborg A. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(6):575–93. CrossRef
- HFEA. Fertility problems and treatment—facts and figures. 2006 [cited 2006 27.06.2006]; Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/PressOffice//Factsandfigures/.
- Marlow N et al. Neurological and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. New Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):9–19. CrossRef
- ESHRE. Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(4):790–800. CrossRef
- McDonald S et al. Perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am J Obst Gynecol. 2005;193(1):141–52. CrossRef
- Campbell DM, Templeton A. Maternal complications of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;84(1):71–3. CrossRef
- Smithers PR et al. High frequency of cesarean section, antepartum hemorrhage, placenta previa, and preterm delivery in in-vitro fertilization twin pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):666–8. CrossRef
- Olivennes F et al. Behavioral and cognitive development as well as family functioning of twins conceived by assisted reproduction: findings from a large population study. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(3):725–33. CrossRef
- Ellison MA et al. Psychosocial risks associated with multiple births resulting from assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(5):1422–8. CrossRef
- Glazebrook C et al. Parenting stress in first-time mothers of twins and triplets conceived after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(3):505–11. CrossRef
- Saldeen P, Sundstrom P. Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment? Hum Reprod. 2005;20(1):4–8. CrossRef
- Reynolds MA, Schieve LA. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996-2002. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(3):694–700. CrossRef
- Braude, P. One child at a time: reducing multiple births after IVF. 2006, Expert group on multiple births after IVF.
- Glazebrook C et al. Attitudes of infertile couples to a multiple birth; a review of the literature and results from a survey. Curr Womens Health Rev. 2007;3(1):43–8. CrossRef
- Twisk M et al. Preferences of subfertile women regarding elective single embryo transfer: additional in vitro fertilization cycles are acceptable, lower pregnancy rates are not. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(4):1006–9. CrossRef
- Murray S et al. A randomized comparison of alternative methods of imformaton provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(4):911–6. CrossRef
- Porter M, Bhattacharya S. Investigation of staff and patients’ opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(9):2523–30. CrossRef
- Newton CR et al. Factors affecting patients’ attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):269–78. CrossRef
- Pinborg A et al. Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(3):621–7. CrossRef
- Bergh C et al. Attitudes towards and management of single embryo transfer among Nordic IVF doctors. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2007;86:1222–30. CrossRef
- van Wely M et al. Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies? Hum Reprod. 2006;21(11):2736–8. CrossRef
- Gleicher N, Barad D. Twin pregnancy, contrary to consensus, is a desirable outcome in infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2426–31. CrossRef
- Blennborn M et al. The couple’s decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer? Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1292–7. CrossRef
- de Lacey S et al. Factors and perceptions that influence women’s decisions to have a single embryo transferred. Reprod BioMed Online. 2007;15(5):526–31. CrossRef
- van Peperstraten AM et al. Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(12):2718–23. CrossRef
- Grobman WA et al. Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: an assessment of knowledge and risk aversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(4):920–4. CrossRef
- Child T, Henderson A, Tan S. The desire for mulitple pregnancy in male and female infertility patients. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(3):558–61. CrossRef
- Ryan GL et al. The desire of infertile patients for multiple births. Fertili Steril. 2004;81(3):500–4. CrossRef
- Hartshorne GM, Lilford RJ. Different perspectives of patients and health care professionals on the potential benefits and risks of blastocyst culture and multiple embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(4):1023–30. CrossRef
- Ryan GL et al. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(2):354–60. CrossRef
- Hojgaard A et al. Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer—a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2673–8. CrossRef
- Borkenhagen A, Brahler E, Kentenich H. Attitudes of German infertile couples towards multiple births and elective embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(11):2883–7. CrossRef
- Rai V, Glazebrook C. Abstracts and posters presented at the 27th annual conference of the Society for Reproductive and Infant Psychology: development and preliminary validation of the attitudes to twin pregnancies scale. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2007;25(3):243.
- Pinborg A et al. Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2821–9. CrossRef
- Gleicher N et al. The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(5):1079–84.
- Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjo G. Attitudes towards gamete donation among IVF doctors in the Nordic countries-are they in line with national legislation? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26(5):231–8. CrossRef
- HFEA. Success rates 2010 [cited 2010 18.03.2010]; Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/.
- Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;00:1–15.
- Comparing patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS)
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Volume 28, Issue 1 , pp 65-72
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Elective single embryo transfer
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- 2. CARE Fertility, John Webster House, 6 Lawrence Drive, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham, NG8 6PZ, UK