Legitimacy & Canadian Farm Animal Welfare Standards Development: The Case of the National Farm Animal Care Council
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Awareness of farm animal welfare issues is growing in Canada, as part of a larger food movement. The baseline Canadian standards for farm animal welfare—the Recommended Codes of Practice for the Care and Handling of Farm Animals—are up for revision. The success of these standards will depend in part on perceived legitimacy, which helps determine whether voluntary code systems are adopted, implemented, and accepted by target audiences. In the context of the Codes, legitimacy will also hinge on whether the standards-developers marshal narratives about farm animals that accord with their audiences’ expectations. The aim of this paper is to catalogue factors that influence legitimacy in farm animal welfare standard-setting, including which narratives of animal welfare are emphasized by standard-setters. Drawing upon the example of the baseline Canadian standards, and the National Farm Animal Care Council, the paper will present a theoretical and methodological framework for analyzing legitimacy in the context of animal welfare standards-development and discuss associated policy considerations.
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. (2002). Farm animal welfare and codes of practice consultation workshop, September 23–24, 2002, Gatineau, Quebec. Conference Proceedings. http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1184872705336&lang=eng. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. (2008). An overview of Canadian agriculture and agri-food. Ottawa: AAFC.
- Animal Care Act, S.M. (1996). c. 69. http://web2.gov.mb.ca/laws/statutes/1996/c06996e.php. Accessed Jan 9, 2010.
- Balcombe, J. (2006). Pleasurable kingdom: Animals and the nature of feeling good. New York: Macmillan.
- Ballantyne, W. (2006). A proactive approach to animal welfare. Advances in Pork Production, 17, 139–144.
- Bernstein, S. (2004). The elusive basis of legitimacy in global governance: Three conceptions. Institute on globalization and the human condition, Working Paper Series, 2. Hamilton: McMaster University.
- Bisgould, L., King, W., & Stopford, J. (2000). Anything goes: An overview of Canada’s legal approach to animals on factory farms. Report. Animal Alliance. http://animalalliance.ca/projects/AGCREDIT.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Botterill, L. C. (2004). Valuing agriculture: Balancing competing objectives in the policy process. Journal of Public Policy, 24(2), 199–218. CrossRef
- Bracke, M. B. M., De Greef, K. H., & Hopster, H. (2005). Qualitative stakeholder analysis for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 27–56. CrossRef
- Canada Committee on Animals. (2002). Annual report 2001–2002. (On file with author).
- Canadian Agri-Food Research Council. (2003). Recommended code of practice for the care and handling of pullets, layers and spent fowl. http://nfacc.ca/pdf/english/PoultryLayers2003.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Canadian Council of Grocery Distributors. (2006). Leading our industry into the future. Annual report 2005–2006. http://www.ccgd.ca/home/en/MemberReports.htm. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB). (2009). Organic production systems: General principles and management standards. CAN/CGSB 32.310–2006 Amended 2009. Ottawa: CGSB.
- Cashore, B., Auld, G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Cohen, D. (2004). The role of the state in a privatized regulatory environment. In K. Webb (Ed.), Voluntary codes: Private governance, the public interest and innovation (pp. 35–56). Ottawa: Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment.
- Commission of the European Communities. (2002). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament on animal welfare legislation on farmed animals in third countries and the implications for the EU. Brussels: CEC.
- Corporate Responsibility Committee of the Board of Directors of McDonald’s Coproration. (June 29, 2005). Regarding the feasibility of implementing controlled atmosphere stunning for broilers. Report. http://www.mcdonalds.com/corp/invest/gov/mcd_cr062905.html. Accessed March 7, 2009.
- Fraser, D. (2001). The “new perception” of animal agriculture: Legless cows, featherless chickens, and a need for genuine analysis. Journal of Animal Science, 79, 634–641.
- Fraser, D. (2004). Applying science to animal welfare standards. In Proceedings from: Global conference on animal welfare: An OIE initiative, February 23–24, 2004 (pp. 121–125). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://www.oie.int/eng/Welfare_2004/proceedings.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Frewer, L. J., Kole, A., Van de Kroon, M. A., & de Lauwere, C. (2005). Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 345–367. CrossRef
- Garner, R. (2004). Animals, politics and morality (2nd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Grandin, T. (2001). Corporations can be agents of great improvements in animal welfare and food safety and the need for minimum decent standards. Paper presented at the National Institute of Animal Agriculture, April 4, 2001. http://www.grandin.com/welfare/corporation.agents.html. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Haines, R. J. (2004). Farm to fork: A strategy for meat safety in Ontario. Report of the Meat Regulatory and Inspection Review. London, ON: Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/meatinspectionreport/. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Haynes, R. P. (2008). Animal welfare: Competing conceptions and their ethical implications. New York: Springer.
- International Committee of the OIE. (2002). Resolution No. XIV: Animal welfare mandate of the OIE, May 29, 2002. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/international/oie_resolution_en.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Issalys, P. (2005). Choosing among forms of public action: A question of legitimacy. In P. Eliadis, M. M. Hill, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Designing Government (pp. 154–181). Montreal: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
- Kheel, M. (2004). Vegetarianism and ecofeminism: Toppling patriarchy with a fork. In S. F. Sapontzis (Ed.), Food for thought (pp. 327–341). New York: Prometheus Books.
- Koc, M., MacRae, R., Desjardins, E., & Roberts, W. (2008). Getting civil about food: The interactions between civil society and the state to advance food security in Canada. Journal of Health Environmental Nutrition, 3(2), 122–144. CrossRef
- Mayer, H. (2002). Animal welfare verification in Canada: A discussion paper. Report. Alberta Farm Animal Care Council. http://www.afac.ab.ca/reports/AWVReport.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- National Farm Animal Care Council. (2006). Codes of practice guideline document. http://www.nfacc.ca/Projects/Detail.aspx?id=5. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- National Farm Animal Care Council. (2007). Short history of the codes of practice for the care and handling of farm animals. http://www.nfacc.ca/Documents/Default.aspx. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Noske, B. (1997). Beyond boundaries: Humans and animals. Montréal: Black Rose Books.
- Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.36. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90o36_e.htm. Accessed January 9, 2010.
- Purchase, B. (2004). The political economy of voluntary codes. In K. Webb (Ed.), Voluntary codes: Private governance, the public interest and innovation (pp. 77–96). Ottawa: Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment.
- Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652–667. CrossRef
- Serpell, J. A. (1999). Sheep in wolves’ clothing? Attitudes to animals among farmers and scientists. In F. L. Dolins (Ed.), Attitudes to animals (pp. 26–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Skogstad, G. (2003). Who governs? Who should govern? Political authority and legitimacy in Canada in the twenty-first century. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(5), 955–973.
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. CrossRef
- Szablowski, D. (2005). Legitimacy and regulation in the global economy: Legal mediation of conflicts between communities and transnational mining companies. (Doctoral dissertation, York University, 2005).
- te Velde, H., Aarts, N., & van Woerkum, C. (2002). Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15, 203–219. CrossRef
- Thompson, P. (1998). Agricultural ethics: Research, teaching, and public policy. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
- Webb, K. (2004). Introduction: Understanding the voluntary code phenomenon. In K. Webb (Ed.), Voluntary codes: Private governance, the public interest and innovation (pp. 3–31). Ottawa: Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment.
- White, L. (2004). Farmed animals in Ontario. Take Action. Newsletter. Animal Alliance. http://animalalliance.ca/newsletter/s2004.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2009.
- Widowski, T. (2003). Meeting future demands for animal care. Advances in Pork Production, 14, 281–285.
- Wood, S. (2005). Three questions about corporate codes: Problematizations, authorizations and the public/private divide. In W. Cragg (Ed.), Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization (pp. 245–289). Cheltenham: Edward Elga.
- Wood, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental codes and sustainability. In B. J. Richardson & S. Wood (Eds.), Environmental law for sustainability (pp. 229–276). Portland: Hart Publishing.
- Legitimacy & Canadian Farm Animal Welfare Standards Development: The Case of the National Farm Animal Care Council
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
Volume 24, Issue 1 , pp 19-47
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Farm animal welfare
- Voluntary codes