Date: 25 Nov 2012
Whose Doctorate is it Anyway? Guidelines for an Agreement Between Adviser and Doctoral Student Regarding the Advisement Process and Intellectual Property Rights
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The process of advisement in the research of a doctoral dissertation is prolonged and harbors a variety of ethical aspects and issues. In some cases it gives rise to dissatisfaction on the part of both advisor and student regarding the process itself and/or the publication of the dissertation. To ameliorate these problems, the Dissertation Committee of the School of Social Work at the University of Haifa recently set out guidelines for both advisor and doctoral student, in accordance with which both parties will draw up an agreement in advance to suit the student’s research. The present article discusses the components of the advisement process and presents recommendations for an advisor-doctoral student agreement. Although no evaluation was undertaken by the authors to assess the impact of the guidelines agreement, our brief experience with these guidelines reinforces the importance of such an agreement, which can help assure mutual satisfaction on the part of both the advisor and the student.
Ahern, K., & Manathunga, C. (2004). Clutch-starting stalled research students. Innovative Higher Education, 28(4), 237–254.
American Counseling Association (2005). ACA Code of Ethics. Alexandria.
American Educational Research Association (2000). Ethical Standards of the American Educational Research Association, Washington.
American Psychological Association (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2nd ed.). Washington.
Austin, A., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: graduate student socialization for faculty roles. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 21, 397–456.CrossRef
Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. A. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: a look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 297–315.CrossRef
Barnes, B. J. (2005). Success in graduate school. How exemplary advisors guide their doctoral advisees. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Barretta-Herman, A., & Garrett, K. J. (2000). Faculty-student collaboration: issues and recommendations. Advances in Social Work, 1(2), 148–159.
Beal, P. E., & Noel, L. (1980). What works in student retention. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program and National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
Costa, M. M., & Gatz, M. (1992). Determination of authorship credit in published dissertation. Psychological Science, 3, 354–357.CrossRef
Davis, S. J., & Cooper, D. L. (2001). Assessing advising style: student perceptions of academic advisors. College Student Affairs Journal, 20(2), 53–62.
Fairweather, J. S. (1993). Academic values and faculty reward. The Review of Higher Education, 17(1), 43–68.
Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty and Public Trust. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Fine, M. A., & Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on student-faculty collaborations. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1141–1147.CrossRef
Harman, G. (2003). International PhD students in Australian universities: financial support, course experience and career plans. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 339–351.CrossRef
Jeffery, D. D., & Fries, J. (2011). Unauthorized uses of a coauthored work and doctoral dissertation. Ethics & Behavior, 21(2), 118–126.CrossRef
Lowe, A., & Toney, M. (2000). Academic advising: view of the givers and takers. Journal of College Student Retention, 2(2), 93–108.CrossRef
Mitchell, T., & Carroll, J. (2008). Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: issues for student and supervisors. Nurse Education Today, 28, 218–226.CrossRef
Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Vilkinas, T. (2008). An exploratory study of the supervision of Ph.D. research students’ theses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(5), 297–311.CrossRef
Waldeck, J. H., Orrego, V. O., Plax, G., T., & Kearney, P. (1997). Graduate student/Faculty mentoring relationship: who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end. Communication Quarterly, 45, 3, 93–109.
Welfare, L. E., & Sackett, C. R. (2010). Authorship in student-faculty collaborative research: perceptions of current and best practices. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8, 199–215.CrossRef
Yarbrough, D. (2002). The engagement model for effective academic advising with undergraduate college students and student organizations. Journal of Humanistic Counseling Education and Development, 41(1), 61–68.CrossRef
- Whose Doctorate is it Anyway? Guidelines for an Agreement Between Adviser and Doctoral Student Regarding the Advisement Process and Intellectual Property Rights
Journal of Academic Ethics
Volume 11, Issue 1 , pp 73-80
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links