The Health Professional Ethics Rubric: Practical Assessment in Ethics Education for Health Professional Schools
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
A barrier to the development and refinement of ethics education in and across health professional schools is that there is not an agreed upon instrument or method for assessment in ethics education. The most widely used ethics education assessment instrument is the Defining Issues Test (DIT) I & II. This instrument is not specific to the health professions. But it has been modified for use in, and influenced the development of other instruments in, the health professions. The DIT contains certain philosophical assumptions (“Kohlbergian” or “neo-Kohlbergian”) that have been criticized in recent years. It is also expensive for large institutions to use. The purpose of this article is to offer a rubric—which the authors have named the Health Professional Ethics Rubric—for the assessment of several learning outcomes related to ethics education in health science centers. This rubric is not open to the same philosophical critiques as the DIT and other such instruments. This rubric is also practical to use. This article includes the rubric being advocated, which was developed by faculty and administrators at a large academic health science center as a part of a campus-wide ethics education initiative. The process of developing the rubric is described, as well as certain limitations and plans for revision.
- Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2010). Ethical reasoning VALUE rubric. Retrieved July 15, 2010. http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/pdf/ethicalreasoning.pdf.
- Arras, J. D. (1991). Getting down to cases: the revival of casuistry in bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 16(1), 29–51.
- Baldwin, D. C., & Self, D. J. (2006). The assessment of moral reasoning and professionalism in medical education and practice. In D. Stern (Ed.), Measuring medical professionalism (pp. 75–93). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). Oxford University Press: New York.
- Beemsterboer, P. L. (2010). Ethics and law in dental hygiene (2nd ed.). St Louis: Saunders Elsevier.
- Bertolami, C. N. (2004). Why our ethics curricula don’t work. Journal of Dental Education, 68(4), 414–25.
- Buckley, S., et al. (2009). The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No 11. Medical Teacher, 31(4), 282–298. CrossRef
- Calhoun, J. G., et al. (2008). Development of a core competency model for the master of public health degree. American Journal of Public Health, 98(9), 1598–1607. CrossRef
- Carson, R. (1986). Case method. Journal of Medical Ethics, 12, 36–39. CrossRef
- Chambers, T. (2006). Bioethics, religion, and linguistic capital. In D. Guin (Ed.), Handbook of bioethics and religion (pp. 81–92). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Eckles, R. E., et al. (2005). Medical ethics education: where are we? Where should we be going? A review. Academic Medicine, 80(12), 1143–1152. CrossRef
- Engel, G. L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137(5), 535–544.
- Fletcher, J. C., et al. (1997). Introduction to clinical ethics (2nd ed.). Frederick: University Basic Books.
- Fox, E., Arnold, R., & Brody, B. (1995). Medical ethics education: Past, present, and future. Academic Medicine, 70, 761–769. CrossRef
- Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
- Gibbs, J. C., & Widaman, K. F. (1982). Social intelligence: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
- Hoffmaster, B., Stewart, M. A., & Christie, R. J. (1991). Ethical decision making by family doctors in Canada, Britain, and the United States. Social Science and Medicine, 33(6), 647–653. CrossRef
- Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for the social scientist. London: Sage.
- Jennings, et al. (2003). Ethics and public health: A model curriculum. http://www.asph.org/UserFiles/EthicsCurriculum.pdf.
- Jones, A. H. (1999). Narrative based medicine: narrative in medical ethics. British Medical Journal, 318(7178), 253–256. CrossRef
- Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1990). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice (essays on moral development, volume 1). New York: Harper & Row.
- Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages (essays on moral development, volume 2). HarperCollins College Division: New York.
- Lynch, D. C., Surdyk, P. M., & Eiser, A. R. (2004). Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature. Medical Teacher, 26(4), 366–373. CrossRef
- MacDonald, H. (2007). Relational ethics and advocacy in nursing: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(2), 119–126. CrossRef
- Pellegrino, E. (1995). Toward a virtue-based normative ethics for the health professions. Kennedy Institute of Ethic Journal, 5(3), 253–277.
- Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to moral judgment: an overview of Defining Issues Test research. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291–324. CrossRef
- Savulescu, J., et al. (1999). Evaluating ethics competence in medical education. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25, 367–374. CrossRef
- Shamoo, A., & Resnik, D. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Siegler, M., Rezler, A. G., & Connell, K. J. (1982). Using simulated case studies to evaluate a clinical ethics course for junior students. Journal of Medical Education, 57(5), 380–385.
- Stern, D. T. (Ed.). (2006). Measuring medical professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Sulmasy, D. P., Dwyer, M., & Marx, E. (1995). Knowledge, confidence, and attitudes regarding medical ethics: how do faculty and housestaff compare? Academic Medicine, 70(11), 1038–1040. CrossRef
- Tochel, C., et al. (2009). The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Medical Teacher, 31(4), 299–318. CrossRef
- Tronto, J. (2005). An ethic of care. In A. Cudd & R. Andreason (Eds.), Feminist theory: A philosophical anthology (pp. 251–263). Malden: Blackwell.
- Yarborough, M., et al. (2000). Interprofessional education in ethics at an academic health sciences center. Academic Medicine, 75(8), 793–800. CrossRef
- The Health Professional Ethics Rubric: Practical Assessment in Ethics Education for Health Professional Schools
Journal of Academic Ethics
Volume 9, Issue 4 , pp 277-290
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Ethics Education
- Health Professional
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Assistant Professor of Medical Humanities, McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin, Jesse Jones Library, Room 410, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- 2. School of Nursing, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- 3. McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- 4. School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- 5. The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- 6. School of Public Health, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- 7. Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- 8. School of Dentistry, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
- 9. Office of Institutional Quality Assurance, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA