Skip to main content
Log in

Sight Word Instruction for Students with Autism: An Evaluation of the Evidence Base

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the evidence on sight word instruction as a method of teaching students with autism and significant cognitive and verbal limitations to read printed words. Nine single-subject studies were rated using Reichow et al.’s (J Autism Dev Disord 38:1311–1319, 2008) evaluative method for identifying evidence-based practice, and studies with at least adequate methodology were analyzed to identify common intervention features. Results yielded evidence in support of a massed trials approach featuring student response to a succession of items, differential positive reinforcement, systematic prompting, and use of visual supports. Across studies, students learned to identify printed words, even those with limited oral language and no prior reading instruction. However, no studies addressed the effects of sight word instruction on broad literacy outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birkan, B., McClannahan, L., & Krantz, P. (2007). Effects of superimposition and background fading on the sight-word reading of a boy with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broun, L. T. (2004). Teaching students with autism spectrum disorders to read: A visual approach. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broun, L. T., & Oelwein, P. (2007). Literacy development for students with special learning needs: A strength-based approach. Port Chester, NY: National Professional resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D. M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and significant disabilities. NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D., & Xin, Y. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32, 130–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D. M., Courtade-Little, G., Wakeman, S., & Rickelman, R. J. (2006a). From sight words to emergent literacy. In D. Browder & F. Spooner (Eds.), Teaching language arts, math and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities (pp. 63–91). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006b). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D. M., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Spooner, F., Mims, P., & Baker, J. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Baker, S., Doabler, C., & Apichatabutra, C. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Exceptional Children, 75, 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, H., & Lin, Y. (2007). Reading comprehension instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. C., & Stinson, D. M. (1994). Teaching generalized reading of product warning labels to adolescents with mental disabilities through the use of key words. Exceptionality, 5, 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., & Landrum, T. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75, 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, S. R., & Calhoon, J. A. (2007). Word recognition instruction. In S. R. Copeland & E. B. Keefe (Eds.), Effective literacy instruction for students with moderate or severe disabilities (pp. 41–62). Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikeseth, S., & Jahr, E. (2001). The UCLA reading and writing program: An evaluation of the beginning stages. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 289–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, B., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Sight word reading in children with developmental disabilities: A comparison of paired associate and picture-to-text matching instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 411–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Roper-Schneider, D. (1983). A two-stage model of initial reading acquisition. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Searches for meaning in reading/language processing and instruction (pp. 207–211). Rochester NY: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetzroni, O., & Shalem, U. (2005). From logos to orthographic symbols: A multilevel fading computer program for teaching nonverbal children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R., Carr, E., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, S. V., & Mann, V. (2010). A comprehensive profile of decoding and comprehension in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaderavek, J. N., & Rabidoux, P. (2004). Interactive to independent literacy: A model for designing literacy goals for children with atypical communication. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20, 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamps, D., Walker, D., Locke, P., Delquadri, J. and Hall, R. V. (1990). Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliewer, C., & Biklen, D. (2001). “School’s not really a place for reading”: A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. The Journal for the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluth, P., & Chandler-Olcott, K. (2008). “A land we can share”: Teaching literacy to students with autism. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppenhaver, D., & Erickson, K. (2009). Literacy in individuals with autism spectrum disorders who use AAC. In P. Mirenda & T. Iacono (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders and AAC (pp. 385–412). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanter, E., & Watson, L. R. (2008). Promoting literacy in students with ASD: The basics for the SLP. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services, 39, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., Gast, D. L., Luscre, D., & Ayres, K. M. (2008). Observational and incidental learning by children with autism during small group instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 86–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Wagner, A., Rogers, S., Szatmari, P., Aman, M., Charman, T., et al. (2005). Challenges in evaluating psychosocial interventions for autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 695–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G., Krantz, P., & McClannahan, L. (1986). An extension of incidental teaching procedures to reading instruction for autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 147–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Langone, J. (2002). Computer-based video instruction to teach persons with moderate intellectual disabilities to read grocery aisle signs and locate items. Journal of Special Education, 35, 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirenda, P. (2003). “He’s not really a reader”…: Perspectives on supporting literacy development in individuals with autism. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Clarke, P., Wright, B., & Williams, C. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 911–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., Brown, W. H., Frey, T., Karasu, N., Smith-Canter, L., & Strain, P. (2003). Evidence-based practices for young children with autism: Contributions for single-subject design research. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disorders, 18, 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., Rogers, S., McDougle, C. J., Hume, K., & McGee, G. (2007). Early intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder. In S. L. Odom, R. H. Horner, M. E. Snell, & J. Blacher (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities (pp. 199–223). NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichow, B., Volkmar, F. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (2008). Development of the evaluative method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1311–1319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. S., Bott, D., Majsterek, D., Chiang, B., Gartland, D., Wesson, C., et al. (1992). Minimum standards for the description of participants in learning disabilities research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1998). Childhood autism rating scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. L., & Myles, B. S. (2008). Educating children and youth with autism: Strategies for effective practice (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRI International. (2002). SEELS data tables. Retrieved from http://www.seels.net/search/datatableOverview.htm.

  • Whalon, K. J., Al Otaiba, S., & Delano, M. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disorders, 24, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sarah Rockwell, University of Florida, served as the second rater in coding and evaluating all studies. Brian Reichow, Yale University, provided assistance with initial rating questions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet E. Spector.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spector, J.E. Sight Word Instruction for Students with Autism: An Evaluation of the Evidence Base. J Autism Dev Disord 41, 1411–1422 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1165-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1165-x

Keywords

Navigation