Abstract
Children with social communication disorders are known to experience more problematic peer relations than typically-developing children. However, detailed observation of their behaviour and communication during interaction with peers has not previously been undertaken. Micro-analytic observational methods were used to analyse the audio-taped interaction of children (N = 112) selected from mainstream schools (ages 5–6 years-old) on a computerised dyadic collaborative task. Comparisons were made between children with average-to-high- and low-pragmatic language skill as measured by the Test of Pragmatic Skills. Dyads were composed of an average-to-high-skilled child plus a low-skilled child (32 dyads), or of two average-to-high-skilled children (24 dyads). Consistently with their pragmatic language scores, low-skilled children were more likely to ignore other children’s questions and requests than were average-to-high-skilled children. When average-to-high-skilled children worked with low-skilled children, as opposed to with other average-to-high-skilled children, they showed some sensitivity and adaptation to these children’s difficulties; they used significantly more directives, clarification and provided more information. However, there was a cost in terms of the emotional tone of these interactions; when working with low-skilled children, the average-to-high-skilled children expressed considerably more negative feelings towards their partners than with another average-to-high-skilled child. In conclusion, observation of the interaction of average-to-high- and low-skilled children suggests promise for peer-assisted interventions and specifies which communicative behaviours could be targeted. However, care should be taken to manage the affective climate of these interactions for the benefit of all children involved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington: Author.
Anderson, A. H., Clark, A., & Mullin, J. (1994). Interactive communication between children: learning how to make language work in dialogue. Journal of Child Language, 21, 439–463.
Barron, A., & Foot, H. (1991). Peer tutoring and tutor training. Educational Research, 33, 174–185.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). The children’s communication checklist (2nd ed.). London: Harcourt Assessment.
Bishop, D. V. M., & Adams, C. (1991). What do referential communication tasks measure? a study of children with specific language impairment. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 12, 199–215.
Bishop, D. V. M., & McDonald, D. (2009). Identifying language impairment in children: combining language test scores with parental report. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44, 600–615.
Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., Montague, E. C., & Hanton, J. L. (2000). Children with language impairment in cooperative work groups: a pilot study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 252–264.
Ciairano, S., Visu-Petra, L., & Settanni, M. (2007). Executive inhibitory control and cooperative behavior during early school years: a follow-up study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 335–345.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Botting, N. (2004). Social difficulties and victimisation in children with SLI at 11 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 145–161.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British picture vocabulary scale (Rev. ed.). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Gottman, J. M., & Parker, J. G. (Eds.). (1986). Conversations of friends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guralnick, M. J., & Paul-Brown, D. (1989). Peer-related communicative competence of preschool children: developmental and adaptive characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 930–943.
Joiner, R., Faulkner, D., Littleton, K., & Miell, D. (Eds.). (2000). Rethinking collaborative learning. London: Free Association Press.
Kasari, C., Rotheram-Fuller, E., Locke, J., & Gulsrad, A. (2012). Making the connection: randomized controlled trial of social skills at school for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 431–439.
Ketelaars, M. P., Cuperus, J., Jansonius, K., & Verhoeven, L. (2010). Pragmatic language impairment and associated behavioural problems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45, 204–214.
Kruger, A. (1993). Peer collaboration: conflict, co-operation or both. Social Development, 2, 165–182.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
Laws, G., Bates, G., Feuerstein, M., Mason-Apps, E., & White, C. (2012). Peer acceptance of children with language and communication impairments in a mainstream primary school: associations with type of language difficulty, problem behaviours and a change in placement organization. Child Language, Teaching and Therapy, 28, 73–86.
Lindsay, G., Dockrell, J., Desforges, M., Law, J., & Peacy, N. (2010). Meeting the needs of children and young people with speech, language and communication difficulties. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45, 448–460.
Lloyd, P., Boada, H., & Forns, M. (1992). New directions in referential communication research. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 385–403.
Markell, R., & Asher, S. (1984). Children’s interactions in dyads: interpersonal influence and sociometric status. Child Development, 55, 1412–1424.
Murphy, S., & Faulkner, D. (2006). Gender differences in verbal communication between popular and unpopular children during an interactive task. Social Development, 15, 82–108.
Murphy, S., & Faulkner, D. (2011). The relationship between bullying roles and children’s everyday dyadic interactions. Social Development, 20, 272–293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00597.x.
Nilsen, E. S., & Graham, S. A. (2009). The relations between children’s communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 220–249.
Norbury, C. F., Nash, M., Baird, G., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2004). Using a parental checklist to identify diagnostic groups in children with communication impairment: a validation of the Children’s Communication Checklist-2. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39, 345–364.
Office of National Statistics, retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.uk, September, 2011.
Radziszewska, B., & Rogoff, B. (1988). Influence of adult and peer collaborators on children’s planning skills. Developmental Psychology, 24, 840–848.
Reisinger, L. M., Cornish, K. M., & Fombonne, E. (2011). Diagnostic differentiation of autism spectrum disorders and pragmatic language impairment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1694–1704.
Reiter, S., & Vitani, T. (2007). Inclusion of pupils with autism. Autism, 11, 321–333.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2003). r(equivalent): a simple effect size indicator. Psychological Methods, 8, 492–496.
Shulman, B. B. (1986). Test of pragmatic skills–revised. Tucson: Communication Skill Builders.
Shute, R., Foot, H., & Morgan, M. (1992). The sensitivity of children and adults as tutors. Educational Studies, 18, 21–36.
Whitehouse, A. J. O., Watt, H. J., Line, E. A., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2009). Adult psychosocial outcomes of children with specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and autism. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44, 511–528.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the pupils, teachers and parents of Bedford lower schools for their participation, Mr. John Leary for technical design of the Maze Task, Ms. Eva Fotopoulou and Ms. Laila Horan for assistance with coding, system design and inter-rater reliability scoring and Mr. Richard Parker of Cambridge University for statistical advice. This study was funded in part by a grant from the Bedford Charity to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 18 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, S.M., Faulkner, D.M. & Farley, L.R. The Behaviour of Young Children with Social Communication Disorders During Dyadic Interaction with Peers. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42, 277–289 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9772-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9772-6