Skip to main content
Log in

Costs and Benefits of Bullying in the Context of the Peer Group: A Three Wave Longitudinal Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whereas previous research has shown that bullying in youth is predictive of a range of negative outcomes later in life, the more proximal consequences of bullying in the context of the peer group at school are not as clear. The present three-wave longitudinal study followed children (N = 394; 53 % girls; M age = 10.3 at Time 1) from late childhood into early adolescence. Joint trajectory analyses were used to examine the dynamic prospective relations between bullying on the one hand, and indices tapping perceived popularity, peer-reported social acceptance, self-perceived social competence, and internalizing symptoms on the other. Results show that although young bullies may be on a developmental path that in the long run becomes problematic, from the bullies’ perspective in the shorter term personal advantages outweigh disadvantages. High bullying is highly positively related to high social status as indexed by perceived popularity. Although bullies are not very high in peer-rated social acceptance, most are not very low either. Moreover, bullies do not demonstrate elevated internalizing symptoms, or problems in the social domain as indexed by self-perceived social competence. As bullying yields clear personal benefits for the bullies without strong costs, the findings underscore the need for interventions targeting mechanisms that reward bullying (198 words).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bender, D., & Losel, F. (2011). Bullying at school as a predictor of delinquency, violence, and other anti-social behaviour in adulthood. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21, 99–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Turgeon, L., Poulin, F., & Wanner, B. (2004). Is there a dark side of positive illusions? overestimation of social competence and subsequent adjustment in aggressive and non-aggressive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 302–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorpita, B. F., Yim, L., Moffitt, C., Umetoto, L. A., & Francis, S. E. (2000). Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 835–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, C. F., & Kistner, J. A. (2000). Do positive self-perceptions have a “dark side?” Examination of the link between perceptual bias and aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 327–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., & Dekker, P. (2006). The new participant role scales: A comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P.H., Stump, K.N., & Ratliff, J.M. (2010). Sidestepping the jingle fallacy: Bullying, aggression, and the importance of knowing the difference. In D. Espelage & S. Swearer, Bullying in American Schools (pp. 101–115). Rutledge.

  • Hymel, S., Bowker, A., & Woody, E. (1993). Aggressive versus withdrawn unpopular children: Variations in peer and self-perceptions in multiple domains. Child Development, 64, 879–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, B. A., Loch, C. A., & Őnçűler, A. (2004). Status a s a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Pospikarta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, 82, 311–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klugkist, I., Laudy, O., & Hoijtink, H. (2005). Bayesian evaluation of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables. Psychological Methods, 15, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, G. H., Akkermans, W., & van der Linden, J. L. (1996). Two- dimensional sociometric status determination with rating scales. Small Group Research, 27, 56–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeus, W., Van De Schoot, R., Klimstra, T., & Branje, S. (2011). Personality types in adolescence: Change and stability and links with adjustment and relationships: A five-wave longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1181–1195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Meesters, C., & Schouten, E. (2002). A brief questionnaire of DSM-IV defined anxiety and depression symptoms among children. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9, 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). MPlus User’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modelling of development over the life course. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, T. R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method. Psychological Methods, 6, 18–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M. D., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and associations with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ojanen, T., Gronroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41, 699–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2008). Bullying and the need to belong: Early adolescents’ bullying-related behavior and the acceptance they desire and receive from particular classmates. Social Development, 17, 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, E. A., & van der Meulen, M. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 339–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1991). Bully-victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In D. Pepler & K. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., Connolly, J., Yuile, A., & Jiang, D. (2006). A developmental perspective on bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepler, D., Jiang, D., Craig, W., & Connolly, J. (2008). Developmental trajectories of bullying and associated factors. Child Development, 79, 325–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, E., & Idsoe, T. (2001). Aggression and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 446–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., & Swenson, L. P. (2009). Do perceived popular adolescents who aggress against others experience emotional adjustment problems themselves? Developmental Psychology, 45, 868–872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). Development, evaluation, and diffusion of a national anti-bullying program, KiVa. In B. Doll, W. Pfol, & J. S. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science (pp. 240–254). New York: Routledge.

  • Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. (2009). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interaction, relationships, and groups (pp. 322–340). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, R. H. J., Engels, R. C. M. E., Overbeek, G., Van de Kemp, R. A. T., & Haselager, G. J. T. (2007). Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 217–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38, 735–747.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvaldo, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sourander, A., Jensen, P., Rönning, J. A., Niemelä, S., Helenius, H., Sillanmäki, L., Kumpulainen, K., Piha, J., Tamminen, T., Moilanen, I., & Almqvist, F. (2007). What is the early adulthood outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in childhood? The finnish “From a Boy to a Man” study. Pediatrics, 120, 397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). “Bullying and theory of mind”: A critique of the social skills deficit view of anti-social behavior. Social Development, 8, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Losel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011). The predictive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending: A systematic/meta analytic review of longitudinal studies. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 21, 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex- and peer valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81, 480–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veerman, J. W., Straathof, M. A. E., & Ten Brink, L. T. (1996). Measuring children’s self-concept. Factorial validity and invariance across normal and clinical groups. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 142–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T., & Van de Schoot, R. (2012). Reporting violent victimization to the police: The role of the sex of the offender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1276–1292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Reijntjes.

Additional information

This research was funded by a grant (431-09-030) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) awarded to Dr. Goossens and Dr. Vermande

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T. et al. Costs and Benefits of Bullying in the Context of the Peer Group: A Three Wave Longitudinal Analysis. J Abnorm Child Psychol 41, 1217–1229 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9759-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9759-3

Keywords

Navigation