Learning through creating robotic models of biological systems
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper considers an approach to studying issues in technology and science, which integrates design and inquiry activities towards creating and exploring technological models of scientific phenomena. We implemented this approach in a context where the learner inquires into a biological phenomenon and develops its representation in the form of a robotic model. Our multi-case study involved middle school students and prospective teachers. We considered learning processes, in which the learners used PicoCricket robot construction kits to create a variety of bio-inspired robotic models. We present two such models and the teaching strategy which organizes modeling activities into five learning stages. Based on analysis of learning activities and their outcomes along with the studied cases, we explored characteristics of the learning environment and of the proposed integrative teaching approach. The findings indicate the potential of modeling as a thread, tying together engineering design and scientific inquiry into an integrative learning activity.
- Cianchi, M. (1988). Leonardo da vinci ’ s machines (pp. 45–61). Florence: Becocci.
- Vries, MJ (2006) Book review: John K. Gilbert and Carolyn J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education. Internation J of Techno and Design Education 16: pp. 97-100 CrossRef
- Dede, C, Barab, S (2009) Emerging technologies for learning science: A time of rapid advances. Journal of Science Education and Technology 18: pp. 301-304 CrossRef
- Elmer, R, Davies, T Modelling and creativity in design and technology education. In: Gilbert, J, Boulter, C eds. (2000) Developing models in science education. Kluwer, Dodrecht, pp. 137-156 CrossRef
- Fensham, PJ (2009) Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46: pp. 884-896 CrossRef
- Gilbert, JK, Boulter, CJ, Elmer, R Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In: Gilbert, JK, Boulter, CJ eds. (2000) Developing models in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 3-17 CrossRef
- Glaser, B, Strauss, A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago
- Guyton, A. C., & Hall, J. E. (2006). Textbook of medical physiology (11th ed., pp. 111). Boston: Saunders.
- Hofstein, A, Lunetta, VN (2004) The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education 88: pp. 28-54 CrossRef
- Hsieh, P, Cho, Y, Liu, M, Schallert, DL (2008) Examining the interplay between middle school students’ achievement goals and self efficacy in a technology-enhanced learning environment. American Secondary Education 36: pp. 33-50
- Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. The author, Reston, Virginia
- Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. The author, Reston, Virginia
- Kolodner, J. L. (2009). Learning by design’s framework for promoting learning of 21st century skills. In Presentation to the national research council workshop on exploring the intersection of science education and the development of 21st century skills. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Kolodner_21st%20Century_Paper.pdf. Retrieved May 15, 2012.
- Kolodner, JL, Camp, PJ, Crismond, D, Fasse, B, Gray, J, Holbrook, J, Puntambekar, S, Ryan, M (2003) Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning-by-design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12: pp. 495-548 CrossRef
- Lewis, T (2006) Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43: pp. 255-281 CrossRef
- Lipson, H. (2007). Printable 3D models for customized hands-on education. In Proceedings of mass customization and personalization (MCPC) 2007, Cambridge, MA.
- Lodico, M, Spaulding, DT, Voegthe, KH (2006) Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. Wiley, San Francisco
- Milard, M (2002) Using construction kits, modelling tools and system dynamics simulations to support collaborative discovery learning. Educational Technology and Society 5: pp. 76-87
- Miller, GA (2003) The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: pp. 141-144 CrossRef
- Ming, N. C. (2009). Analogies vs. contrasts: A comparison of their learning benefits. In B. Kokinov, D. Gentner, & K. Holyoak (Eds.), New frontiers in analogy research: Proceedings of the second international conference on analogy (pp. 338–347). Sofia, Bulgaria: New Bulgarian University.
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Papert, S Situating constructionism. In: Harel, I, Papert, S eds. (1991) Constructionism. NJ, Norwood
- Pavlovic, A, Demko, V, Hudak, J (2010) Trap closure and prey retention in Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis.) temporarily reduces photosynthesis and stimulates respiration. Annals of Botany 105: pp. 37-44 CrossRef
- Resnick, M, Berg, R, Eisenberg, M (2000) Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9: pp. 7-30 CrossRef
- Resnick, M., Martin, F., Berg, R., Borovoy, R., Colella, V., Kramer, K., & Silverman, B. (1998). Digital manipulatives: New toys to think with. In Proceedings of the CHI’98 Conference, Los Angeles.
- Ropohl, G (1997) Knowledge types in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7: pp. 65-72 CrossRef
- Rusk, N, Resnick, M, Berg, R, Pezalla-Granlund, M (2008) New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17: pp. 59-69 CrossRef
- Seel, N, Blumschein, P Modeling and simulation in learning and instruction: A theoretical perspective. In: Blumschein, P, Hung, W, Jonassen, D eds. (2009) Model-based approaches to learning: Using systems models and simulations to improve understanding and problem solving in complex domains. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp. 3-15
- Sherry, RA, Galen, C (1998) The mechanism of floral heliotropism in the snow buttercup. Ranunculus adoneus. Plant Cell and Environment 21: pp. 983-993 CrossRef
- Verner, I. M., & Cuperman, D. (2010). Learning by inquiry into natural phenomena and construction of their robotic representations. In H. Middleton (Ed.), Knowledge in technology education (pp. 171–177), Griffith Institute for Educational Research, Griffith University.
- Verner, IM, Polishuk, A, Klein, Y, Cuperman, D, Mir, R (2012) A learning excellence program in a science museum as a pathway into robotics. International Journal of Engineering Education 28: pp. 523-533
- Volkov, AG, Adesina, T, Markin, VS, Jovanov, E (2007) Kinetics and mechanism of Dionaea muscipula Ellis trap closing. Plant Physiology 146: pp. 694-702 CrossRef
- Wan, KK (2007) Towards an anthropocentric vision in the learning of concepts in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 17: pp. 1-3
- Yin, RK (2003) Case study research: Design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
- Learning through creating robotic models of biological systems
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Volume 23, Issue 4 , pp 849-866
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Science–technology education
- Biological system