Using ‘Electronic Portfolios’ to Challenge Current Orthodoxies in the Presentation of an Initial Teacher Training Design and Technology Activity
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The paper examines the extent to which a University undergraduate curriculum initiative provided initial teacher trainees with opportunities to challenge orthodox design methodologies through the production of an electronic portfolio within and extended design and technology activity. It was found that the ‘electronic portfolio’ served primarily as a developmental tool for promoting creative continuity and sound, reflective, design practice within a structured educational design challenge. The portfolio also provided a focus for the development of ‘e’ learning skills as it facilitated the use of new technologies in the compilation of the portfolio. Additionally, the portfolio provided trainees with a means by which they were able to demonstrate their capability to prospective employers. The use of the ‘electronic portfolio’ challenges current orthodoxy and methods routinely employed to present and assess trainees’ creative work, which have been shown to constrain innovative practice. The paper concludes that the use of the ‘electronic’ portfolio was successful in facilitating trainees’ engagement with a creative Design and Technology process.
- Barnes, R. (1989) Art, Design and Topic Work 8–13. Allen & Unwin, London
- Barlex, D. (2003) The Unique Contribution of Design and Technology: Building on Success. Department for Education and Skills, London
- Bennett, N., Desforges, C., Cockburn, A., Wilkinson, B. (1984) The Quality of Pupil Learning Experiences. Lawrence Erlbaum, London
- Cross, N. G. (1990) ‘The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability’. Design Studies 11: pp. 127-140 CrossRef
- Holden, J. D. (2001) ‘Hawthorne Effects and Research into Professional Practice’. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2001–2007 1: pp. 65-70
- Hopper, M. G., Hepton, B. & Downie, M.: 1999, ‘Supporting the Development of Creativity and Innovation – further issues examined as part of an extended curriculum development initiative’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research and Curriculum Development, pp. 97–106, Loughborough University, Loughborough.
- Hargreaves, A. (2003) Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Uncertainty. Open University Press, Maidenhead
- Krueger, B., Wallace, J. (1996) ‘Portfolio Assessment: Possibilities and Pointers for Practice, Australian’. Science Teacher’s Journal 42: pp. 26
- Kimbell, R. A., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wozniak, A. & Kelly, V.: 1991, The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology London. School Examinations and Assessment Council/Central Office of Information.
- Kimbell, R.: 2005, Digital capture and the club med test. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 10, 2, 7–8, 2005, Design and Technology Association, Wellesbourne.
- Lave, J. (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- McCormick, R.: 2004, Issues of Learning and Knowledge in Technology Education; International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14, 21–44, 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
- McMillan, J. H. (2004) Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective instruction. Pearson, New York
- Ofsted Subject Reports Secondary Design and Technology, 1999–2000. The Stationary Office, London
- Prawat, R., Floden, R. (1994) ‘Philosophical Perspectives on Constructivist Views of Learning’. Educational Psychology 29: pp. 37-48
- Stables, K. & Kimbell, R. A.: 2000, ‘The Unpickled Portfolio: Pioneering Performance Assessment in Design and Technology.’ Design and Technology International Millennium Conference.
- Shield, G. (1996) ‘Learning Teaching through a Process Approach: The Implementation of Curriculum Innovation Through the Pragmatic Interventions of the Teacher’. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 6: pp. 1-14 CrossRef
- Shulman, L. Teacher Portfolios: A Theoretical Activity. In: Lyons, N. eds. (1998) With Portfolio in Hand. Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 23-37
- Spendlove, D. & Hopper, M.: 2004, ‘Creativity in Design and Technology and ICT: Imagining Possibilities in a Digital Age’, in E. Norman, D. Spendlove, P. Grover & A. Mitchell (eds.), Creativity and Imagination – DATA International Research Conference July 2004, pp. 173 –178.
- Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, London
- Sturman, A. Case Study Methods. In: Keeves, J. P., Lakomski, G. eds. (1999) Issues in Educational Research. Pergamon, Oxford
- Thistlewood, D. The Essential Disciplines of Design Education. In: Thistlewood, D. eds. (1990) Issues in Design Education. Longman, London
- Thistlewood, D.: 1997, ‘Supporting Innovation in Schools Project: Factors Inhibiting Key Designer Attributes in Current NC Design and Technology Teaching’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research and Curriculum Development, pp. 243, Loughborough University, Loughborough.
- Using ‘Electronic Portfolios’ to Challenge Current Orthodoxies in the Presentation of an Initial Teacher Training Design and Technology Activity
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Volume 16, Issue 2 , pp 177-191
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Design and Technology (D&T)
- design practice
- electronic portfolio
- Initial Teacher Training (ITT)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- 2. Faculty of Education, Community and Leisure, Liverpool John Moores University, I.M.Marsh Campus, Barkhill Road Aigburth, Liverpool, L17 6BD, United Kingdom