Using ‘Electronic Portfolios’ to Challenge Current Orthodoxies in the Presentation of an Initial Teacher Training Design and Technology Activity
Cite this article as: Spendlove, D. & Hopper, M. Int J Technol Des Educ (2006) 16: 177. doi:10.1007/s10798-005-3596-9 Abstract
The paper examines the extent to which a University undergraduate curriculum initiative provided initial teacher trainees with opportunities to challenge orthodox design methodologies through the production of an electronic portfolio within and extended design and technology activity. It was found that the ‘electronic portfolio’ served primarily as a developmental tool for promoting creative continuity and sound, reflective, design practice within a structured educational design challenge. The portfolio also provided a focus for the development of ‘e’ learning skills as it facilitated the use of new technologies in the compilation of the portfolio. Additionally, the portfolio provided trainees with a means by which they were able to demonstrate their capability to prospective employers. The use of the ‘electronic portfolio’ challenges current orthodoxy and methods routinely employed to present and assess trainees’ creative work, which have been shown to constrain innovative practice. The paper concludes that the use of the ‘electronic’ portfolio was successful in facilitating trainees’ engagement with a creative Design and Technology process.
Keywords creativity Design and Technology (D&T) design practice electronic portfolio Initial Teacher Training (ITT) innovation References Barnes, R. 1989Art, Design and Topic Work 8–13 Allen & Unwin London Google Scholar Barlex, D. 2003The Unique Contribution of Design and Technology: Building on Success Department for Education and Skills London Google Scholar Bennett, N., Desforges, C., Cockburn, A., Wilkinson, B. 1984The Quality of Pupil Learning Experiences Lawrence Erlbaum London Google Scholar Cross, N. G. 1990 ‘The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability’ Design Studies 11 127 140 CrossRef Google Scholar Holden, J. D. 2001 ‘Hawthorne Effects and Research into Professional Practice’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2001–2007 1 65 70 Google Scholar
Hopper, M. G., Hepton, B. & Downie, M.: 1999, ‘Supporting the Development of Creativity and Innovation – further issues examined as part of an extended curriculum development initiative’, in J. S. Smith (ed.),
International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research and Curriculum Development, pp. 97–106, Loughborough University, Loughborough. Hargreaves, A. 2003Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Uncertainty Open University Press Maidenhead Google Scholar Krueger, B., Wallace, J. 1996 ‘Portfolio Assessment: Possibilities and Pointers for Practice, Australian’ Science Teacher’s Journal 42 26 Google Scholar
Kimbell, R. A., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wozniak, A. & Kelly, V.: 1991, The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology London. School Examinations and Assessment Council/Central Office of Information.
Kimbell, R.: 2005,
Digital capture and the club med test. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 10, 2, 7–8, 2005, Design and Technology Association, Wellesbourne. Lave, J. 1988Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life Cambridge University Press Cambridge Google Scholar
McCormick, R.: 2004,
Issues of Learning and Knowledge in Technology Education; International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14, 21–44, 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. McMillan, J. H. 2004Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective instruction3 Pearson New York Google Scholar Office for Standards in Education 2000Ofsted Subject Reports Secondary Design and Technology, 1999–2000 The Stationary Office London Google Scholar Prawat, R., Floden, R. 1994 ‘Philosophical Perspectives on Constructivist Views of Learning’ Educational Psychology 29 37 48 Google Scholar
Stables, K. & Kimbell, R. A.: 2000, ‘The Unpickled Portfolio: Pioneering Performance Assessment in Design and Technology.’ Design and Technology International Millennium Conference.
Shield, G. 1996 ‘Learning Teaching through a Process Approach: The Implementation of Curriculum Innovation Through the Pragmatic Interventions of the Teacher’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 6 1 14 CrossRef Google Scholar Shulman, L. 1998 Teacher Portfolios: A Theoretical Activity Lyons, N. eds. With Portfolio in Hand Teachers College Press New York 23 37 Google Scholar
Spendlove, D. & Hopper, M.: 2004, ‘Creativity in Design and Technology and ICT: Imagining Possibilities in a Digital Age’, in E. Norman, D. Spendlove, P. Grover & A. Mitchell (eds.),
Creativity and Imagination – DATA International Research Conference July 2004, pp. 173 –178. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. 1990Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques Sage London Google Scholar Sturman, A. 1999 Case Study Methods Keeves, J. P. Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in Educational Research Pergamon Oxford Google Scholar Thistlewood, D. 1990 The Essential Disciplines of Design Education Thistlewood, D. eds. Issues in Design Education Longman London Google Scholar
Thistlewood, D.: 1997, ‘Supporting Innovation in Schools Project: Factors Inhibiting Key Designer Attributes in Current NC Design and Technology Teaching’, in J. S. Smith (ed.),
International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research and Curriculum Development, pp. 243, Loughborough University, Loughborough.