International Ophthalmology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 241–250

Biopsy techniques and yields in diagnosing primary intraocular lymphoma

Authors

  • John A. Gonzales
    • Immunopathology Section, Laboratory of ImmunologyNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health
    • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    • Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California
    • Immunopathology Section, Laboratory of ImmunologyNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10792-007-9065-6

Cite this article as:
Gonzales, J.A. & Chan, C. Int Ophthalmol (2007) 27: 241. doi:10.1007/s10792-007-9065-6

Abstract

A review of current biopsy techniques that are used in obtaining specimens from which to make a diagnosis of primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is presented. Methods for obtaining and subsequently testing vitrectomy specimens are discussed. In addition, the yields of external and internal approaches for obtaining chorioretinal tissue, and diagnostic vitrectomies, are reviewed.

Keywords

Primary intraocular lymphomaVitrectomyChorioretinal biopsyTransvitreal retinal biopsy

Abbreviations

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

PCNSL

primary central nervous system lymphoma

PIOL

primary intraocular lymphoma

PCR

polymerase chain reaction amplification.

RPE

retinal pigment epithelium

Introduction

Primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is a subset of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) with predilection for intraocular regions that sit behind the blood-retina barrier [14]. PIOL is a unique malignant lymphoproliferation because of its affectation of an immune privileged site, involving the subretinal pigment epithelium (RPE), retina, vitreous, and optic nerve. Frequently masquerading as a uveitis, PIOL is often misdiagnosed for intraocular inflammation and is treated with corticosteroids [5] or, infrequently, PIOL can masquerade as a viral retinitis and is treated with antiviral medication [6]. It is not until the presumed uveitis fails to respond to corticosteroid therapy that another cause is sought. Prompt diagnosis of PIOL is imperative because consultation with a neurooncologist and initiation of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy can extend the patient’s life. Furthermore, most cases of PIOL will eventually involve the brain (PCNSL) [1, 7], which has a poor prognosis. Thus, if disease can be halted within the eye, there is a possibility that morbidity and mortality may be improved in patients with PIOL. Diagnosis of PIOL requires histopathologic evidence of the malignant lymphoma cells. A tissue biopsy must be obtained from which to make a pathologic diagnosis and perform further testing including molecular analyses. When undertaking a biopsy it is important to have a diagnostic plan laid out. Because an ocular pathologist will ultimately receive the biopsy specimen and will be making the diagnosis in a suspected case of PIOL, it is important to involve this member of the patient’s care team prior to bringing the patient to the operating room. The ocular pathologist can help determine which affected intraocular structure may provide the best opportunity to result in the highest yield of lymphoma cells.

In this article, we review the biopsy techniques and yields that may be employed in order to provide tissue from which to make a diagnosis of PIOL in suspect cases. It is important to realize that, if a patient is suspected of having PIOL, a lumbar puncture with cytologic analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) should be performed because of the high possibility of brain involvement in PIOL [1, 3, 79]. In addition, patients should also receive a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to determine whether lesions are present in the absence of obvious lymphoma cells in the CSF. When brain involvement has been ruled out by the above procedures, we focus on the involved eye from which to make a diagnosis.

Historical background

Prior to the advent of pars plana vitrectomy in the 1970s pioneered by Machemer [1015], enucleation [16, 17] was the first surgical procedure employed by ophthalmic surgeons to make a diagnosis of the so-called reticulum cell sarcoma (as PIOL was known prior to the 1970s) [8, 17, 18]. Enucleation could be performed in patients’ eyes in which there was no possibility of restoring vision (vision worse than count fingers) due to massive involvement or in eyes that had become intractably painful. In addition, in patients succumbing to their disease, enucleation could be performed to confirm a clinical suspicion of reticulum cell sarcoma. Enucleation, however, is not an ideal diagnostic procedure to undertake when a patient still has potential functional vision and an otherwise normal eye.

Vitreous biopsy

The vitreous remains the preferred tissue to sample when an eye exhibits chronic uveitis of unknown cause or intraocular malignancy or infection is suspected. Vitrectomy is also indicated when there is potential for treatment to be initiated or changed upon the diagnostic procedures used on the vitrectomy specimen. Indeed, often masquerading as a vitritis, PIOL cells are commonly found in the vitreous and this structure is most frequently biopsied to make a pathologic diagnosis of PIOL.

Cytologic examination of vitreous biopsy specimens has been employed to make a diagnosis of PIOL since the mid-1970s in cases that were initially diagnosed as uveitis [19, 20]. However, lack of improvement with typical corticosteroid treatment prompted vitreous biopsy with cytology, revealing the atypical lymphocytes associated with PIOL [19, 20]. Importantly, a final diagnosis of PIOL allows the appropriate treatment to commence (in the mid-1970s this was primarily radiation treatment [19, 20]). Vitrectomy can also yield a diagnosis of PIOL when lumbar puncture and cytologic analysis of CSF fail to reveal PCNSL cells [21].

The technique for performing a complete pars plana vitrectomy in a suspected case of PIOL follows typical protocol. A standard three-port pars plana approach is employed. Because cytology [22] is standard and we frequently use molecular analysis with polymerase chain reaction amplification (PCR) [2325] and cytokine-level analysis [26, 27], a complete core vitrectomy is recommended. Undiluted vitreous is first obtained for cytological analysis. A dilute specimen (in which cytokine levels could be measured) is then obtained by using the infuser and cutting the remaining vitreous. Vitreous wash fluid that has been collected in the vitrector cassette should also be used for microbiologic cultures. In order to prevent cell death, 1–2 ml of vitreous specimen may be expediently placed into a tube containing Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) culture medium for a total volume of 2–5 ml of fluid. This fluid should then be sent immediately to an awaiting cytologist or ocular pathologist who will perform the appropriate steps to obtain the best yield [28]. It must be stressed that time is of the essence because lymphoma cells rapidly begin to degenerate. Centrifugation of the submitted sample at 1,000 rpm and pipeting the supernatant into another tube for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay and molecular investigation (PCR for infective virus) are recommended [2325, 2931]. The sediment in the original tube is then resuspended in 0.2–1 ml of RPMI and cytocentrifuged again. They are used for cytology and molecular analyses (PCR for monoclonality of malignant B, or rarely T, cells). Figure 1 demonstrates the protocol one may follow after collecting the vitreous specimen.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10792-007-9065-6/MediaObjects/10792_2007_9065_Fig1_HTML.gif
Fig. 1

Diagram of handling and processing vitreous specimen

Vitreous specimens may not always contain neoplastic cells and, thus, be negative for the diagnosis of PIOL. This might especially be the case if there is minimal vitreal involvement by the PIOL cells [32] or the cells have degenerated. Sometimes the quality of the cytology is poor, therefore making it unfeasible to make the diagnosis. In such events, it may be necessary to perform another vitrectomy and send to a well-qualified cytological laboratory [3].

Davis and colleagues submitted vitrectomy specimens from 27 patients suspected of having an intraocular malignancy to analysis by cytology [33]. A final diagnosis of lymphoma was achieved in 13 patients with cytology yielding four true positive lymphoma cases (a sensitivity of 31%) and no false positive cases. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of cytologic evaluation, then, was 100 and 60.9%, respectively. Thus, while a positive cytologic evaluation was certain for lymphoma, a negative evaluation certainly does not completely rule out the possibility of intraocular lymphoma. Earlier, in a series of 87 patients who, by clinical examination, were suspicious for PIOL it was found by cytologic analysis of the vitreous specimen that 42 were positive for PIOL, another three were suspicious for PIOL, and 42 were negative [34].

A negative cytology, then, is not always reassuring. When suspicion for PIOL still runs high, it is important to consider other adjunctive testing to which the vitrectomy specimen might be submitted. In addition, while the ability to acquire vitreous specimens exists at many surgical ophthalmology centers, the appropriate analyses and experienced pathologists to evaluate such specimens reliably may not. In these instances, it is important to consider sending the vitreous specimen to a center that has the capacity to evaluate it. However, even though the vitreous specimen may be sent to a major hospital with an experienced histopathologist, the very real possibility that any lymphoma cells within the vitreous biopsy could degenerate exists. It is imperative that the appropriate handing of the vitreous specimen occur and to be aware of adjunctive tests that may be performed at a nearby laboratory by those experienced with the basic techniques of molecular biology [2].

Diagnostic testing of vitrous biopsy specimen (sample)

Cytology

Cytology is the cornerstone by which a diagnosis of PIOL is achieved. The malignant B-cells of PIOL exhibit characteristic features that can be revealed using either Giemsa or Diff Quick staining [2, 23]. Large round or oval nuclei (frequently segmented and often containing prominent nucleoli) surrounded by scant basophilic cytoplasm are the defining features of this intraocular lymphoproliferation (Fig. 2) [1, 2, 20, 22, 23, 35].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10792-007-9065-6/MediaObjects/10792_2007_9065_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Fig. 2

Cytology showing classical PIOL cells with large nuclear, prominent nucleoli, and scant basophilic cytoplasm (Giemsa, original magnification, 640×)

Cytologic examination of the vitreous specimen can be difficult because there may be a relative lack of lymphoma cells compared to reactive inflammatory cells [4]. In addition, atypical lymphoma cells may be in a state of necrosis such that necrotic debris does not allow for a diagnosis of PIOL to be secured (Fig. 3) [2, 36].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10792-007-9065-6/MediaObjects/10792_2007_9065_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Fig. 3

Cytology showing degenerative cells with poor morphology (Giemsa, original magnification, 400×)

Cytokine measurements

B-cell malignancies can secrete high levels of IL-10 [37], an immunosupressive cytokine, while inflammatory conditions (such as uveitis [38]) are associated with high levels of IL-6 [3941], a pro-inflammatory cytokine [42, 43]. We [24, 26, 44, 45] and others [27, 46] have shown that PIOL can exhibit high IL-10 levels with IL-10:IL-6 ratios greater than 1.0 being suggestive of PIOL [47]. Cytokine levels and IL-10:IL-6 ratios are by no means diagnostic of PIOL, but they can be useful adjunctive tests in corroborating suspicion of PIOL and determining whether there is a durable response to treatment. For example, one of our patients had IL-10 levels that seemed to correlate with the amount of cells in the vitreous and degree of vision [48]. The patient received systemic and intrathecal methotrexate (receiving six cycles). Over six years, however, vitreous biopsy showed that there continued to be intraocular disease. When IL-10 levels were high and IL-10:IL-6 ratios were much greater than 1.0, there were noted to be many more vitreous cells and relatively poor vision. After intravitreal methotrexate administration, the patient would respond by having low to undetectable levels of IL-10 and IL-10:IL-6 ratios less than 1.0, correlating with a relative lack of vitreous cells and improvement in vision. This patient, however, developed new cerebral lesions (PCNSL) and eventually expired. We have shown that cytokine levels can be significantly different between intraocular lymphoma and uveitis [26]. By determining a IL-10:IL-6 ratio greater than 1.0 in suspected cases of PIOL, we correctly classified such cases as PIOL 74.7% of the time (with a sensitivity and specificity for the cutoff of 74.3 and 75.0%, respectively) [26]. Figure 1 shows an appropriate step in which to submit part of the vitreous specimen to cytokine analysis.

Molecular analysis

Perhaps one of the most promising methods for demonstrating malignancy outside the realm of cytology is the use of PCR to show a monoclonal proliferation of malignant B-cells (or, in very rare instances, T-cells) [49]. Unfixed and unstained cytospin slides should be sent to a molecular lab, such as at the National Eye Institute (NEI), where microdissection of a minimal of 15 atypical cells may then be subjected to molecular analysis (Fig. 4) [24, 25, 50]. When using PCR to detect monoclonality [specifically, rearrangements of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene] of the malignant B-cell, the malignant cells most frequently involved in PIOL, knowledge of the typical primers used is essential. At the NEI we use primers including those for the second framework region (FR2A 5′-TGGRTCCGMCAGSCVYCNGG-3′), the third frame work region (FR3A 5′- ACACGGCYSTGTATTACTGT-3′), and CDR3 (5′-CCGGRAARRGTCTGGAGTGG-3′) to detect monoclonality within the variable region of the third complementary determining region (CDR3) in the IgH gene (Fig. 4B) [24, 25, 29]. Very rarely are PIOLs of T-cell lineage and if there is strong clinical evidence for suggesting such an entity (as in the setting of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma/mycosis fungoides) then we identify gene rearrangements in the T-cell receptor (TCR) gene by using primers for CDR3 and the variable region in the gamma chain (γ) gene [51]. All primers and necessary reagents are purchased from commercial sources.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10792-007-9065-6/MediaObjects/10792_2007_9065_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Fig. 4

(A) Photomicrograph showing the microdissected atypical cells to be submitted to molecular analysis (Giemsa, original magnification, 400×); (B) PCR amplification showing positive IgH gene rearrangement in these cells (first lane) as compared to the positive control (last lane) and negative control (middle lane)

It remains to be seen, however, what the PPV and NPV of PCR testing might be. Currently, cytologic evaluation is still the gold standard by which diagnoses of PIOL are made. If PCR, in fact, yields sensitivity far superior to that of cytology (while maintaining the same specificity, i.e., 100%) perhaps PCR analysis of vitrectomy specimens may supplant cytology for making a diagnosis of PIOL. Vitreous samples that contain very few lymphoma cells that are outnumbered by inflammatory cells may result in the polyclonal inflammatory cells overshadowing the monoclonality of the PIOL cells. Histo- and cytopathologic evaluations will never truly be supplanted because identification of malignant cells to describe immunohistological subtyping and to identify atypical cells for microdissection (which can improve the sensitivity of PCR analysis) will always be necessary. Indeed, at the NEI we are familiar with cytologic evaluation being noncontributory in making a diagnosis of PIOL. While we frequently employ molecular pathologic analysis (microdissection and PCR) to determine monoclonal rearrangement of the IgH gene [24, 25, 29] this test is still considered to be adjunctive to cytology. Appropriate time points to perform PCR are shown in Fig. 1.

External chorioretinal biopsy

While vitrectomy with the aforementioned evaluations may provide the ophthalmic surgeon with a diagnosis, this technique requires that there be malignant cells within the vitreous. However, failure to identify malignant cells in the vitreous can occur and may be due to degeneration of the malignant lymphoma cells, paucity of cells in the vitreous, or lack of involvement altogether of the vitreous. Lymphomatous involvement may be confined solely to the sub-RPE and chorioretinal biopsy (pioneered by Peyman and colleagues [5255]) may yield tissue with which to make a diagnosis of PIOL. Interestingly, Peyman and colleagues were the first to report making a diagnosis of PIOL from tissue obtained via external chorioretinal biopsy [55].

The surgical technique for performing an external chorioretinal biopsy is fairly straightforward and is discussed with references to its essential points [56, 59]. First, provided that the fundus is clearly visible, laser photocoagulation is applied 1–3 days before surgery in a zone of the area to be biopsied. If the vitreous is too hazy, endolaser is placed immediately following vitrectomy. After a 360° conjunctival incision and isolation and tying of the rectus muscles a three-port pars plana vitrectomy is performed (in addition to endolaser application in the area to be biopsied if it was not placed prior to the surgery). The vitreous specimen (dilute and undilute) is sent for cytologic and microbiologic analyses as well as cytokine (IL-10 and IL-6) levels [1, 2, 24, 25, 30, 31, 57]. A nearly full-thickness scleral flap is made, leaving one side attached to act as a hinge. When the flap of sclera is retracted, the surgeon is able to visualize the choroids, which is practically bare. Next, a penetrating diathermy is placed through the choroid and retina along the outer margin of the inner choroidal bed. Two incisions parallel to the limbus are made. Next, by inserting one blade of a 0.12 forceps through the incision, the full thickness of the choroid and retina may be grasped at one edge. Then, two more incisions, perpendicular to the limbus, are made with Vannas scissors, thereby yielding a block of chorioretinal tissue. Extreme care should be taken to grasp the full-thickness tissue only once with the forceps so that the architecture of the tissue remains intact [56, 59]. The scleral flap is then closed over the wound and is sutured closed followed by fluid-gas exchange.

Chorioretinal biopsy, then, can be an important surgical procedure when other diagnostic tests have not resulted in identification of an infectious, malignant, or inflammatory etiology and when instituted empirical therapy has not changed the disease course [5860]. Chorioretinal biopsy can provide excellent anatomy for the diagnosis of PIOL (Fig. 5).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10792-007-9065-6/MediaObjects/10792_2007_9065_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Fig. 5

(A) Ophthalmoscopic examination showing haze vitreous and multiple yellowish subretinal lesions; (B) Chorioretinal biopsy of a methacrylate section showing PIOL cells (asterisk) located between the retina (R) and choroids (C), where inflammatory cells infiltrate (hematoxylin & eosin, original magnification, 100×)

Transvitreal retinochoroidal biopsy

Transvitreal retinochoroidal (endoretinal) biopsy is another approach by which chorioretinal tissue is aquired [56]. Briefly, in this technique a standard three-port vitrectomy is performed (sending undiluted and diluted vitrectomy to the pathology lab for analysis) with endodiathermy used to outline an area of retina that is of interest. The demarcated retinal tissue is then removed, intraocular scissors are introduced into the vitreous space and a small hole is created in the retina such that the area of interest is excised. With intraocular forceps, the retinal tissue is brought to the opening for the vitrector and is gently drained out of the eye using intraocular irrigation [56]. This technique was used in the past to obtain retinal tissue in difficult cases of PIOL. For example, one 67-year-old woman presented with lesions reminiscent of viral retinitis (Fig. 6A), but was recalcitrant to corticosteroid and anti-viral therapy (Desai, Sundar, Chan, unpublished data). Due to the patient’s rapidly deteriorating vision as well as bilaterally ominous lesions (with those in the right eye encroaching on the fovea), transvitreal retinochoroidal biopsy was performed (Fig. 6B). Cytology of the vitreous fluid obtained from vitrectomy (and cerebrospinal fluid from lumbar puncture) failed to reveal lymphoma cells. However, assay for IL-10 in the vitreous and CSF were 5,456 pg/ml (normal = 0 pg/ml) and 25 pg/ml (normal = 0 pg/ml), respectively and IL-6 levels were 193 pg/ml (normal = 0 pg/ml) and undetectable in the vitreous and CSF, respectively. Immunopathology of the retinal specimen (snap frozen) showed a predominance of B-lymphocytes (positive for CD19, CD20, and CD22) with monoclonal restriction (κ light chain positive). Thus, PIOL was highly suggested by these findings and a MRI with gadolinium of the brain was performed showing a 1 × 1 cm mass lesion in the right frontal lobe that enhanced with contrast. Biopsy of this mass revealed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCNSL). Whole-brain radiation therapy was then instituted.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10792-007-9065-6/MediaObjects/10792_2007_9065_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Fig. 6

(A) Ophthalmoscopic examination showing multiple large and small orange-yellowish subretinal lesions; (B) Endoretinal biopsy of a frozen section showing disorganized retinal tissues and poor morphology (hematoxylin & eosin, original magnification, 200×)

Cassoux and colleagues have also used endoretinal biopsy to diagnose PIOL when vitrectomy was nondiagnostic [61]. The patient had undergone vitrectomy twice that failed to reveal any malignant lymphocytes, but a high IL-10 level was detected [61]. Cassoux et al. noted that their technique for performing an endoretinal biopsy involved the induction of a localized retinal detachment (if one was not already present) by injecting sodium hyaluronate into the subretina. The resultant bulging retina was subsequently excised by cutting around the perimeter with scissors and extricating the biopsy with forceps. Endolaser was then applied around the biopsy site [61].

Diagnostic testing of chorioretinal and endoretinal biopsy tissue

The biopsy tissue is immediately processed by an ophthalmic pathologist in the operating room. It is generally divided into three portions [62]. One third of the tissue is fixated for routine histopathologic studies, including light and electron microscopic examinations. The second portion is snap frozen in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) embedding compound and is used for immunopathologic and molecular characterization. The third portion is sent for culture with the preference for viral and other microorganisms cultures and/or tissue culture [62].

Again, external chorioretinal and transvitreal retinochoroidal biopsies are typically performed when diagnostic vitrectomy in inconclusive but there remains a very high suspicion for PIOL. Risks of biopsying, which include hypotony, hemorrhages, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and cataract formation should be outweighed by the risk of allowing lesions that threaten the macula, or are infectious or malignant in etiology to progress. In addition, a plan should be designed so that proper testing of the biopsy tissue is carried out. This requires coordinating care amongst the surgeons, pathologist, microbiologist, and molecular biologists. The information obtained from the biopsy can often lead to a change in clinical treatment (such as initiating chemotherapy) with benefits not only seen in visual acuity improvement and tumor regression, but in potentially extending the life of the patient [59].

Endoretinal biopsy tissues are often small and delicate and require handling with extra care [63]. The biopsy specimen may not be able to be divided into three portions, but, rather, only enough to be processed for frozen sections. These sections can then undergo routine histology, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis.

In summary, vitreal, chroioretinal and/or endoretinal biopsy is needed to provide the diagnosis of PIOL if lymphoma cells are not found in the CSF. Prior to the biopsy procedure, it is critical to have a thorough discussion among the surgeons (vitreoretinal surgeon and uveitis specialist), pathologists and molecular biologists. The discussion and plan will help to minimize surgical risks and to carry out the biopsy tissue properly. The information obtained from the biopsy can often lead to a correct diagnosis, appropriate clinical treatment, and prolonging the PIOL patient’s life [64].

Acknowledgement

Support: The NEI intramural research program

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007