Climate justice and bargaining coalitions: a discourse analysis
- René Audet
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article adopts a perspective of climate justice as an object of discourse and takes the bargaining coalitions at the Conference of the Parties as the relevant units to map the heterogeneous discourse on climate justice at the Cancun COP16. Based on the statements of nine coalitions, the analysis identifies three discourses on climate justice. The conflict discourse articulates the North–South duality over issues of historical responsibility for climate change. The transition discourse points to solving the problem of sharing the cost of mitigating climate change through a process of global low-carbon growth. The vulnerability discourse focuses on the urgency of ambitious actions by all parties. These three discourses, and their appropriation by the bargaining coalitions, are inherent of new alignments among developed and developing countries alliances and blocs that simultaneously reproduce and surpass the North–South ideological divide.
- Adamian, M. J. (2008). Environmental (in)justice in climate change. In S. Vanderheiden (Ed.), Political theory and global climate change (pp. 67–87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Adamson, J., Evans, M. M., & Stein, R. (Eds.). (2002). The environmental justice reader. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
- Agarwal, A., & Narain, S. (1991). Global warming in an unequal world. A case of environmental colonialism. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.
- AOSIS. (2009). Proposal by the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) for the survival of the Kyoto Protocol and a Copenhagen Protocol to enhance the implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
- BASIC experts. (2011). Equitable access to sustainable development: Contribution to the body of scientific knowledge. Beijing, Brasilia, Cape Town and Mumbai: BASIC expert group.
- Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Berger, M. T. (1994). The end of the third world? Third World Quarterly, 15(2), 257–275. CrossRef
- Cartagena Dialogue. (2010). Third meeting of the Cartagena Dialogue for progressive action. Press release, November 2, 2010, San Jose, Costa Rica.
- Christoff, P. (2010). Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics, 19(4), 637–656. CrossRef
- COP15-SES. (2009). Environmental Integrity Group. On-line: http://cop15-ses.wikispaces.com/Environmental+Integrity+Group.
- Dimitrov, R. S. (2010). Inside UN climate change negotiations: the Copenhagen conference. Review of Policy Research, 27(6), 795–821. CrossRef
- Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
- Foucault, M. (1971). L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.
- Garibaldi, J. A. (2009). La Economía de la Audacia o si una política climática ambiciosa es la mejor para la America Latina, Energeia.
- Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Haas, P. M. (2002). UN conferences and constructivist governance of the environment. Global Governance, 8, 73–91.
- Ikeme, J. (2003). Equity, environmental justice and sustainability: Incomplete approaches in climate change politics. Global Environmental Change, 13, 195–206. CrossRef
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2010). The economics of transition in the power sector. OECD/IEA publication. Retrieved February 29, 2012 from http://www.iea.org/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=2209.
- Mortimer, R. A. (1984). The third world coalition in international politics. Boulder, London: Westview Press.
- Murphy, C. (1984). The emergence of the NIEO ideology. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Narlikar, A. (2003). International trade and developing countries. Bargaining coalitions in the GATT & WTO. New York: Routledge.
- Narlikar, A., & Tussie, D. (2004). The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing countries and their evolving coalitions in the WTO. The World Economy, 27(7), 947–966. CrossRef
- Office of Climate Change. (2006). The Stern review on the economics of climate change. Retrieved May 3, 2011 from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Transition to a low-carbon economy. Public goals and corporate practices. OECD publication.
- Pan African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA). (2010). Statement of the African Civil Society during the 14th ordinary Summit of the African Union. Addis Ababa, February 1, 2010. Retrieved October 1, from http://www.ayicc.net/?p=108.
- Paterson, M. (2001). Principles of justice in the context of global climate change. In U. Luterbacher & D. F. Sprinz (Eds.), International relations and global climate change (pp. 119–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- The Hartwell Paper (Ed.). (2010). The Harwell Paper. A new direction for climate policy after the crash of 2009. Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, University of Oxford/London School of Economics.
- Peoples Agreement. (2010). World people’s conference on climate change and the rights of mother Earth, April 22, Cochabamba, Bolivia. Retrieved May 3, 2011 from http://pwccc.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/peoples-agreement/#more-1584.
- Persaud, R. B. (2003). Reconceptualizing the global south perspective: The end of the Bandung spirit. In J. A. Braveboy-Wagner (Ed.), The foreign policies of the global south. Rethinking conceptual frameworks (pp. 49–63). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Raymond, L. (2008). Allocating global commons: Theory and practice. In S. Vanderheiden (Ed.), Political theory and global climate change (pp. 3–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Roberts, J. T. (2007). Globalizing environmental justice. In R. Sandler & P. C. Pezzulllo (Eds.), Environmental justice and environmentalism. The social justice challenge to the environmental movement (pp. 285–307). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2007). A Climate of injustice. Global inequality, North–South politics and climate policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Rowlands, I. H. (2001). Classical theories of international relations. In U. Luterbacher & D. F. Sprinz (Eds.), International relations and global climate change (pp. 43–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Sandler, R., & Pezzullo, P. C. (Eds.). (2007). Environmental justice and environmentalism. The social justice challenge to the environmental movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Solon, P. (2010). Why Bolivia opposed the Cancún deal. The Guardian, December 21.
- UN. (1974). Charter of economic rights and duties of states. Resolution number 3281 (XXIV).
- UN. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
- Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Climate change, environmental rights, and emission shares. In S. Vanderheiden (Ed.), Political theory and global climate change (pp. 43–66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- White, L., & Skidmore, N. (2003/2004). The metamorphosis of the butterfly: From a South–South trade strategy to trilateral coalition building. SA Yearbook of International Affairs (pp. 159–169).
- Wiegandt, E. (2001). Climate change, equity, and international negotiations. In U. Luterbacher & D. F. Sprinz (Eds.), International relations and global climate change (pp. 127–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Climate justice and bargaining coalitions: a discourse analysis
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume 13, Issue 3 , pp 369-386
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Climate justice
- Climate negotiations
- Bargaining coalitions
- Discourse analysis
- North–South conflict
- Industry Sectors
- René Audet (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Département stratégie, responsabilité sociale et environnementale, École des sciences de la gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, Case postale 8888, succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada