The use of “security” jargon in sustainable development discourse: evidence from UN Commission on Sustainable Development
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The premise of discourse theory in environmental policy is that realities are shaped by language. One discourse that is gaining popularity is the concept of environmental security, a discourse that presupposes environmental threats as urgent. The attempt to cast environmental issues as security issues has resulted in the common use of security jargon, idioms, and metaphors in policymakers’ and politicians’ statements. Various analyses attempt to identify why natural resources are discussed in terms and language of security. However, far fewer studies have attempted to identify differences in the manner in which different types of resources are incorporated into such a discourse by different actors and what variables contribute to this process. This study examines the construction of the security references, security arguments, and language in the statements of the Commission on Sustainable Development dealing with energy and water. We found that international organizations and Non-governmental Organizations were somewhat more likely than state actors to use security references to discuss sustainability issues. The issues securitized are not the traditional high political ones such as regime stability and conflicts, but rather issues more associated with human security, such as access to renewable energy, affordable food, and clean water. The fact that in many statements examined the use of security references was not associated with any existential threat and hence did not comply with the conditions of the Copenhagen School raises some doubts as to whether security language in these statements implies a true securitization move. We also examined whether the use of the term “security” by states was correlated with greater resource scarcity or vulnerability. In the case of water-related sessions, the evidence was mixed, depending on the choice of dependent variable. The results from energy security regressions, however, were inconsistent with the hypothesis that greater scarcity or vulnerability induces more use of security language.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Alatout, S. (2006). Towards a bio-territorial conception of power: Territory, population, and environmental narratives in Palestine and Israel. Political Geography, 25(6), 601–621. CrossRef
- Alatout, S. (2007). State-ing natural resources through law: The codification and articulation of water scarcity and citizenship in Israel. Arab World Geographers, 10(1), 16–37.
- Allenby, B. R. (2000). Environmental security: Concept and implementation. International Political Science Review, 21(1), 5–21. CrossRef
- Axworthy, L. (2001). Human security and global governance: Putting people first. Global Governance, 7, 19–23.
- Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, 23(1), 5–29. CrossRef
- Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political, agency, audience, and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201. CrossRef
- Balzacq, T. (2008). The policy tools of securitization: Information exchange, EU foreign and interior policies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(1), 75–100.
- Barnett, J. (2001). Security and climate change. Tyndall Centre. Working paper no. 7.
- Bethurem, N. L. (2002). Environmental destruction in the name of national security: Will the old paradigm return in the wake of September 11? Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, 8, 109–127.
- Blakeney, M. (2009). Intellectual property rights and food security. Cambridge, MA: CABI. CrossRef
- Brock, L. (1997). The environment and security: Conceptual and theoretical issues. In N. P. Gleditsch (Ed.), Conflict and the environment (pp. 17–34). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRef
- Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Pub.
- Chandler, D. (2008). Human security: The dog that didn’t bark. Security Dialogue, 39(4), 427–438. CrossRef
- Chester, L. (2010). Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature. Energy Policy, 38(2), 887–895. CrossRef
- Cho, D., Ogwang, T., & Opio, C. (2010). Simplifying the Water Poverty Index. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 257–267. CrossRef
- Ciută, F. (2010). Conceptual notes on energy security: Total or banal security? Security Dialogue, 41(2), 123–144. CrossRef
- Conca, K. (1994). In the name of sustainability: Peace studies and environmental discourse. Peace & Change, 19(2), 91–113. CrossRef
- Cook, C., & Bakker, K. (2012). Water security: Debating an emerging paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 94–102. CrossRef
- Detraz, N. (2011). Threats or vulnerabilities? Assessing the link between climate change and security. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 104–120. CrossRef
- Detraz, N., & Betsill, M. M. (2009). Climate change and environmental security: For whom the discourse shifts. International Studies Perspectives, 10(3), 303–320. CrossRef
- Deudeny, D. (1990). Environment and security: Muddled thinking. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 47(3), 21–28.
- Doyle, A. (2007, August 22). Climate change called security issue like cold war. Reuters News Service.
- Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The politics of the earth. Environmental discourses. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
- ECSP—Environmental Change and Security Program. (1995). ECSP report 1. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/ECSP1.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2011.
- FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2011). Aquastat database. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm. Accessed 1 Mar 2011.
- Graeger, N. (1996). Environmental security? Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), 109–116. CrossRef
- Grey, D., & Sadoff, C. W. (2007). Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy, 9(6), 545–571. CrossRef
- Grove, K. J. (2010). Insuring “our common future?” Dangerous climate change and the biopolitics of environmental security. Geopolitics, 15, 536–563. CrossRef
- Haas, P. M. (2002). Constructing environmental conflicts from resource scarcity. Global Environmental Politics, 2(1), 1–11. CrossRef
- Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. CrossRef
- Hale, S. (2010). The new politics of climate change: Why we are falling and how we can succeed. Environmental Politics, 19(2), 255–275. CrossRef
- Harré, R., Brockmeier, J., & Mühlhäusler, P. (1999). Greenspeak. A Study of Environmental Discourse. London: Sage Publications.
- Hughes, L. (2009). The four R’s of energy security. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2459–2461. CrossRef
- Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What can we do for sustainability. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8–21. CrossRef
- Katz, D. (2011). Hydro-political hyperbole: Examining incentives for overemphasizing the risks of water wars. Global Environmental Politics, 11(1), 12–35. CrossRef
- Keohane, R., & Victor, D. (2010). The regime complex for climate change. Discussion paper 10–33. Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
- Khagram, S., & Ali, S. (2006). Environment and security. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 395–411. CrossRef
- King, G., & Murray, C. J. L. (2001). Rethinking human security. Political Science Quarterly, 116(4), 585–610. (Winter, 2001–2002). CrossRef
- Kruyt, Bert., van Vuuren, D. P., de Vries, H. J. M., & Groenenberg, H. (2009). Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2166–2181. CrossRef
- Lansing, J. S. (1991). Priests and programmers: Technologies of power in the engineered landscape of Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Lautze, J., & Manthrithilake, H. (2012). Water security: Old concepts, new package, what value? Natural Resources Forum, 36(2), 76–87. CrossRef
- Lawrence, P., Meigh, J., & Sullivan, C. (2002). The Water Poverty Index: An international comparison, Keele ECONOMICS RESEARCH papers 2002/19. UK: Keele University.
- Levy, M. (1995). Is the environment a national security issue? International Security, 20(2), 35–62. CrossRef
- Lipson, C. (1984). International cooperation in economic and security affairs. World Politics, 37(1), 1–23. CrossRef
- MacLean, S. J., Black, D. R., & Shaw, T. M. (Eds.). (2006). A decade of human security: Global governance and new multilateralisms. Aldershot & Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
- Malnes, R. (2008). Climate science and the way we ought to think about Danger. Environmental Politics, 17(4), 660–672. CrossRef
- Maxwell, S. (1996). Food security: A post-modern perspective. Food Policy, 2(2), 155–170. CrossRef
- Mehta, L. (2001). The manufacture of popular perceptions of scarcity: Dams and water-related narratives in Gujarat, India. World Development, 29(12), 2025–2041. CrossRef
- Mulligan, S. (2010). Energy, environment, and security: Critical links in a post-peak world. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 79–100. CrossRef
- Paris, R. (2001). Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air? International Security, 26(2), 87–102. CrossRef
- Pirages, D. (2005). From limits to growth to ecological security. In D. Pirages & D. Cousins (Eds.), From resource scarcity to ecological security (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Risbey, J. S. (2008). The new climate discourse: Alarmist or alarming? Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 26–37. CrossRef
- Rogers-Hayden, T., Hatton, F., & Lorenzoni, I. (2011). ‘Energy security’ and ‘climate change’: Constructing UK energy discursive realities. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 134–142. CrossRef
- Russill, C., & Nyssa, Z. (2009). The tipping point trend in climate change communication. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 336–344. CrossRef
- Schmitt, C. (1985). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Shmueli, D. (2008). Framing in geographical analysis of environmental conflicts: Theory, methodology and three case studies. Geoforum, 39(6), 2048–2061. CrossRef
- Stern, M., & Öjendal, J. (2010). Mapping the security—Development nexus: Conflict, complexity, cacophony, convergence? Security Dialogue, 41(1), 5–29. CrossRef
- Sullivan, C. (2002). Calculating a Water Poverty Index. World Development, 30(7), 1195–1210. CrossRef
- Tadjbakhsh, S., & Chenoy, A. M. (2007). Human security: Concepts and implications. London & New York: Routledge.
- Tarlock, D., & Wouters, P. (2009). Reframing the water security dialogue. Water Law, 20, 53–60.
- Trombetta, M. J. (2008). Environmental security and climate change: Analysing the discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(4), 585–602. CrossRef
- Ungar, S. (2007). Public scares: Changing the issue culture. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change & facilitating social change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In R. D. Lipschutz (Ed.), On security. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Williams, J. (2000). The phenomenology of global warming: The role of proposed solutions as competitive factors in public arenas of discourse. Human Ecology Review, 7(2), 63–72.
- Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 511–531. CrossRef
- World Bank. (1986). Poverty and hunger: Issues and options for food security in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- World Bank. (2010). Worldwide governance indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
- World Energy Council. (2009). World energy and climate policy: 2009 Assessment. London, UK: World Energy Council.
About this Article
- The use of “security” jargon in sustainable development discourse: evidence from UN Commission on Sustainable Development
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume 13, Issue 3 , pp 321-342
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Human security
- Industry Sectors