Adelman, D. (2005). The false promise of the genomics revolution for environmental law. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 29
, 117–177.Google Scholar
Agreement on Internal Trade. (1998). Report of the article 1704 panel concerning a dispute between Alberta and Canada regarding the manganese-based fuel additives act, file no. 97/98-15-MMT-P058. Winnipeg, 12 June.
Alberta Federation of Labour. (2000). Government taking on a health and safety headache at Swan Hills plant. AFL News, 20 October 2000. Retrieved from http://www.afl.org/news/default.cfm?newsId = 107.
Angus, C. (1999). Is Kirkland Land set to become international centre for PCB waste? Highgrader Magazine, September/October 1999. Retrieved from http://www.ban.org/ban_news/PCBs.html.
Blumberg, K. & Walsh, M. (2004). Status report concerning the use of MMT in gasoline. International Council on Clean Transportation, Sept. 2004.
British Columbia Supreme Court. (2001). United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corp. Reasons for the judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Tysoe, 2001 BCSC 664, 5 August 2001.
Canada Federal Court. 2004. Canada (Attorney General) v. S.D. Myers, Inc., 2004 FC 38, 2004 CarswellNat 94.
California Air Resources Board. (2005). California request for oxygenates waiver. Retrieved from http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/gasoline/oxy/oxywav.htm, Last updated 25 July 2005.
del Carmen Carmona Lara, M. (2004a). Gestión de residuos peligrosos en México, Management of hazardous waste in Mexico, Manuscript.
del Carmen Carmona Lara, M. (2004b). Ley general para la prevención y gestión integral de residuos. General law for the prevention and integrated management of wastes, Powerpoint presentation.
CEC. (1996). PCB regional action plan, sound management of chemicals project, December 1996
. Montreal: North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation.Google Scholar
Cole, M. A., Elliott, J. R., & Fredriksson, P. G. (2004). Endogenous pollution havens: Does FDI influence environmental regulations, University of Nottingham, Research paper 2004/20. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract = 764124.
Cortinas de Nava, C. (2004). Los residuos peligrosos en México. Hazardous wastes in Mexico, Manuscript.
Cronin, P. (2002). Metalclad in Mexico. Retrieved from Thunderbird, The Garvin School of International Management. http://www.thunderbird.edu/about_thunderbird/case_series/2001/_01-0019.htm, A case study prepared by Prof. Patrick Cronin.
CVMA. (2002). New study finds manganese-based gasoline additive causes vehicle emission failures. Ottawa: Canadian Motor Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association.
DePalma, A. (2001). NAFTA’s powerful little secret. New York Times, 11 March 2001, sec. 3, p. 1.
Energy Information Administration (2003). Status and impact of state MTBE ban. Retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/mtbeban/, Last updated 2003.
Environment Canada. (1998a). Press release: Government to act on agreement on internal trade (AIT) panel report on MMT, 20 July 1998
. Ottawa: Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Environment Canada. (1998b). Progress on the program for destruction of federal polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), August 1998
. Ottawa: Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Environment Canada. (2001). Office of the auditor general of Canada, Minister’s response: Environment Canada (EC), 5 December 2001
. Ottawa: Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Environment Canada. (2003). Environment Canada’s proposed framework for an independent third-party review of new information on the effects of MMT on vehicle emissions, 10 December 2003
. Ottawa: Environment Canada.Google Scholar
EPA. (2004). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, State actions banning MTBE (statewide), June, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/mtbe/420b04009.pdf.
EPA. (2005). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) overview. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/mtbe/faq.htm#background (last updated August 31, 2005).
Fernández-Bremauntz, A. (2005). Personal communication, 1 Dec. 2005. Mr. Fernández-Bremauntz is President of Mexico’s Instituto Nacional de Ecología, National Institute of Ecology.
Gantz, D. (1993). Resolution of investment disputes under the North American Free Trade Agreement. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 10
, 335–348.Google Scholar
Gantz, D. (2001). Potential conflicts between investor rights and environmental regulation under NAFTA’s Chapter 11. George Washington International Law Review, 33
, 651–752.Google Scholar
González Vázquez, A. (1997). Guadalcázar, zona ecológica en SLP; descartado, reabrir el confinamiento (Guadalcazar, ecological zone in SLP; decided to reopen the waste site). La Jornada, 17 September.
Hart, M.& Dymond, W. (2002). NAFTA Chapter 11: Precedents, principles, and prospects. Retrieved from Carleton University website at http://www.carleton.ca/ctpl/ch11papers/hartdymond.htm.
Hazmat. (1999). PCB update. Hazmat Magazine April/May 1999.
Health Canada. (2001). Office of the auditor general, response of health Canada to the petition filed July 2001 received by the minister of health July 23, 2001
. Ottawa: Health Canada, November 2001.Google Scholar
Hilborn, J.C. and S. Hart. (1998). The management and disposal of PCBs in Canada. Paper presented at United Nations Environment Programme Chemical Program workshop on subregional awareness raising on persistent organic pollutants, Argentina: Puerto Iguazú. Retrieved from http://www.chem.unep.ch/pops/POPS_Inc/proceedings/Iguazu/HART.html .
ICSID. (2000). Metalclad Corporation and the United Mexican States, Award of the arbitral tribunal. Vancouver: International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, 30 August 2000.
ICSID. (2002). Methanex Corporation and United States of America, Preliminary Award of the Tribunal on Jurisdiction and Admissibility. Washington DC: International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, 7 August 2002.
ICSID. (2003). Award: Tecnicas Medioambientales TECMED S.A. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2. Washington, DC: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 29 May 2003.
ICSID. (2005a). Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. The United States of America. Procedural order no. 1. International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, 3 March 2005.
ICSID. (2005b). Methanex Corporation and United States of America, Final Award of the Tribunal on Jurisdiction and Merits. International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, 3 August 2005.
IISD. (2001). Private rights, public problems: a guide to NAFTA’s controversial chapter on investor rights. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Mann, H. (2005). The final decision in Methanex v. United States: some new wine in some new bottles
. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Medellín Milán, P. (2002). Metalclad vs Guadalcázar vs México. Paper presented at a seminar on analysis of the NAFTA Chapter 11 investment regime and the environment, Mexico D. F., 13 March 2002. Retrieved from http://ambiental.uaslp.mx/docs/PMM-PN-020312-CIDE-MtlcdGdlc.pdf.
Methanex Corporation. (2001). Draft Amended Claim, February 12, 2001. Retrieved from http://www.state.gov/s/l/c5819.htm.
Methanex Corporation. (2002). Global environmental excellence report 2002. Retrieved from http://www.methanex.com/environment/documents/2002_Environmental_Excellence_Report.pdf.
Mexico Federal Law. (2002). Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública Gubernamental (Federal law on transparency and access to public governmental information). Retrieved from http://www.senado.gob.mx/transparencia/ley_fedtransp_11jun02.htm.
Moyers, B. (2002). Trading democracy, NOW with Bill Moyers, Public broadcasting system. Ttranscript retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_tdfull.html.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. (2001). Joint statement by the NAFTA Free Trade Commission: Building on a North American partnership, 31 July 2001.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. (2003). Statement of the Free Trade Commission on non-disputing party participation, 7 October 2003.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. (2004). Joint statement, A Decade of Achievement, 16 July 2004.
Naftaclaims.com. A website at http://www.naftaclaims.com maintained by Todd Jeffrey Weiler that collects all the available documents on NAFTA Chapter 11 claims.
National Round Table. (2001). MMT case study. In National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, Managing potentially toxic substances in Canada: a state of the debate report, Appendix 1.C. Ottawa: National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy.
Ontario. (2004). Ontario ministry of the environment news release: Trans-Cycle Industries, Inc. fined $13,000 for non-compliance with Environmental Protection Act. 7 June 2004. Thunder Bay.
Pembina Institute. (2002). Letter from M.S. Winfield to Frank Coschi, 15 March 2002
. Ottawa: Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development.Google Scholar
Perciasepe, R. (2000). R. Perciasepe (EPA asst. administrator for air & radiation), testimony before the subcommittee on health and environment of the committee on commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, March 2, 2000. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/congress/mar0200.pdf .
Pettigrew, P. (2001). Remarks to the House of Commons, 1 May 2001, by the Hon. Pierre Pettigrew, Minister for International Trade. Retrieved 11 March 2005 from http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/tna-nac/Min_S_Inv-en.asp .
Pfaff, D. (2000). Trade winds. California Lawyer, September 2000, 25.
Price, D. (2001). NAFTA Chapter 11—investor–State dispute settlement: Frankenstein or safety valve? Canada–U.S. Law Journal, 26, 107–112.
Public Citizen. (1998). School of real-life results: NAFTA report card. Washington, D.C.: Public Citizen. Retrieved from http://www.tradewatch.org/nafta/cases/Ethylbri.htm.
Public Citizen. (2001). NAFTA Chapter 11 investor-to-State cases: bankrupting democracy. Washington, DC: Public Citizen. September 2001. Retrieved from http://www.citizen.org/documents/ACF186.PDF .
Quiñones, S. (1997). Disposal dilemma. World Trade, 10
(5), 20.Google Scholar
Quiñones, S. (2000). Down in the dumps. Latin Trade, 8
(3), 68.Google Scholar
S.D. Myers, Inc. and Government of Canada. (2000). Partial award. Toronto: Arbitral Tribunal, 13 November 2000.
S.D. Myers, Inc. and Government of Canada. (2002). Second partial award. Toronto: Arbitral Tribunal, 21 October 2002.
Saleska, S., & Engel, K. (1998). “Facts are stubborn things”: An empirical reality check in the theoretical debate over the race-to-the-bottom in state environmental standard-setting. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 8
, 55–88.Google Scholar
San Luis Potosí. (1997). Sumario del periódico official del gobierno del estado libre y soberano de San Luis Potosí (Summary of the official register of San Luis Potosí), State Executive Order: General coordination of ecology and environmental management, 27 September 1997.
San Luis Potosí. (2003). Ley de Transparencia Administratíva y Acceso a la Información Publica del Estado de San Luis Potosí, Law on administrative transparency and access to public information of the State of San Luis Potosí. Retrieved from http://www.slp.gob.mx/transparencia/Ley.pdf .
San Luis Potosí. (2004). Government of the State of San Luis Potosí, Press Release, 12 May 2004. Retrieved from http://www.slp.gob.mx/ver_noticia.cfm?id = 260.
Sandrino, G. (1994). The NAFTA investment chapter and foreign direct investment in Mexico: a third world perspective, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,
, 259–327.Google Scholar
Semarnat. (2005). Report on state protected area in Guadalcazár, at http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/slp/anps/estatales/estatales_03.shtml#guadalcazar. Website of San Luis Potosí office of Secretaría del medio ambiente y recursos naturals, Mexican department of environment and natural resources, Last updated 21 Dec. 2005.
Semarnat. (2006). Newsletter, Vol. 1, No. 5, May 2006, of San Luis Potosí office of Secretaría del medio ambiente y recursos naturals. Mexican department of environment and natural resources. Retrieved 22 Nov. 2006 from http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/slp/boletin/numero5/boletin.shtml.
Senate of Mexico. (2002). Gaceta Parlamentaria del Senado de la Republica (Parliamentary gazette of the Senate of the Republic. Retrieved from http://www.senado.gob.mx/gaceta.php?&lk = 124/dictamen_apri_rep_checa_2002_5.html.
Senate of Mexico. (2003). Senado de la Republica, Presentación: Transparencia y Acceso a la Información (Senate of the Republic, Presentation: Transparency and access to information), Retrieved from http://www.senado.gob.mx/transparencia/transparencia.htm.
Sierra Club. (2004). Sierra Club of Canada news release: MMT on its way out in Canada, 16 December 2004. Ottawa.
Soloway, J. A. (1999). Environmental trade barriers under NAFTA: the MMT fuel additives controversy. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 8
, 55–93.Google Scholar
Starr, R. (2003). The ugly duckling. Canadian Business, 14 April.
United Nations. (2003). Commission on Human Rights, Report of special rapporteur, Adverse effects of the illicit movement and dumping of toxic and dangerous products and wastes on the enjoyment of human rights, addendum: Mission to Canada 17–30 October 2002, Doc. No. E/CN.4/2003/56/Add.2, 14 January 2003.
United States (2000). United States, Statement of Defense of Respondent United States, August 10. Retrieved from http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/7379.doc .
Von Moltke, K., & Mann, H. 2001. Misappropriation of institutions: some lessons from the environmental dimension of the NAFTA investor-state dispute settlement process. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1
, 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J. Martin. (1999). International investment, expropriation and environmental protection. Golden Gate University Law Review, 29
, 465–538.Google Scholar