Aldy, J. E., Barrett S., & Stavins, R. (2003). Thirteen plus one: A comparison of global limate policy alternatives. Climate Policy, 3
Bang, G., Tjernshaugen, A., & Andresen, S. (2005). Future U.S. climate policy: International re-engagement? International Studies Perspectives, 6
Baumert, K. A., & Kete, N. (2002). Introduction: An architecture for climate protection. In K. A. Baumert (Ed.), Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for protecting the climate (pp. 1–30). Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.
Bodansky, D. (2002). U.S. climate policy after Kyoto: Elements for success. Policy Brief. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Bodansky, D. (2003). Climate commitments: Assessing the options. In Pew Center on Global Climate Change (Ed.), Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the international effort against climate change (pp. 37–59). Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
Bodansky, D., Chou, S., & Jorge-Tresolini, C. (Eds.) (2004). International climate efforts beyond 2012: A survey of approaches. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
Brewer, T. L. & Egenhofer, C. (2005). The political economy of US responses to climate change issues. Final Report, Prepared for Environmental Studies Group, Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan.
Busby, J. W., & Ochs, A. (2005). From Mars, Venus down to Earth: Understanding the transatlantic climate divide. In D. Michel (Eds.), Climate policy for the 21stcentury (pp. 35–76). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Christensen, A. C. (2003). Convergence or divergence?: Status and prospects for US climate strategy. Climate Policy, 3
EIA (2004). Annual energy outlook 2004 with projections to 2025. Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration.
Fisher, D. R. (2004). Bringing the Material Back In: Understanding the United States Position on Climate Change. Department of Sociology, Columbia University.
Grubb, M., & Yamin, F. (2001). Climate collapse at The Hague: What happened, why, and where do we go from here? International Affairs, 77,
Harrison, N. E. (2000). From the inside out: Domestic influences on global environmental policy. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), Climate change and American foreign policy (pp. 89–109). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lisowski, M. (2002). Playing the two-level game: US president Busch’s decision to repudiate the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Politics, 11,
Martin, L. L. (2000). Democratic commitments: Legislatures and international cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Millett, S. M. (1990). The constitutionality of executive agreements: An analysis of United States v. Belmont. New York: Grand Publishing.
Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
National Commission on Energy Policy (NCEP). (2004). Ending the energy stalemate: A bipartisan strategy to meet America’s energy challenges. Washington, DC.: NECP.
Odell, J. S. (2000). Negotiating the world economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Pizer, W. A. & Tamura, K. (2004). Climate policy in the United States and Japan: A workshop summary. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, 04–22.
Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42
Schelling, T. C. (2002). What makes greenhouse sense?: Time to rethink the Kyoto Protocol. Foreign Affairs, 81,2–9.
Tjernshaugen, A. (2005). United States participation in future climate agreements: An assessment. CICERO Policy Note, 01.
Underdal, A. (1998). Explaining compliance and defection: Three models. European Journal of International Relations, 4, 5–30.
Victor, D. G. (2004). Climate change: Debating America’s policy options. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.