The Effectiveness of Non-State Governance Schemes: A Comparative Study of Forest Certification in Norway and Sweden Article Accepted: 07 September 2004 DOI:
Cite this article as: Gulbrandsen, L.H. Int Environ Agreements (2005) 5: 125. doi:10.1007/s10784-004-1010-9 Abstract
During the last decade, we have seen the emergence, under the auspices of non-state authorities, of market-driven governance schemes for certification of forest holdings and eco-labelling of wood products. Do these schemes affect actual management practices and environmental protection in forestry? This article examines the effectiveness of forest certification in Norway and Sweden – two ecologically and politically similar countries, but with different certification schemes. It is found that certification processes in both countries have resulted in high participation in certification schemes, high market penetration by certified forest organisations, and reduced conflict prevalence over forestry practices. Although forest certification seems to have modified on-the-ground practices in ways that lead to less environmental deterioration of forests, we still know too little about forest certification’s environmental impact and efficacy as a problem-solving instrument. More research is therefore urged in these areas.
Keywords eco-labelling effectiveness environmental governance forest certification forestry Norway private authority Sweden voluntary standards References Andersson, M. 2002Naturhänsyn på Certifierade Private Skogsfastigheter – en Jämförelse i Praktiken Mellan FSC och PEFC i Sydsverige (Nature Conservation on Certified Private forestland – a Comparison Between the Two Certification Systems FSC and PEFC in Southern Sweden) Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet Alnarp Google Scholar Bernstein, S., Cashore, B. 2004 ‘Non-State Global Governance: Is Forest Certification a Legitimate Alternative to a Global Forest Convention?’ Kirton, J. Trebilcock, M. eds. Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance Ashgate Aldershot Google Scholar Boström, M. 2002Skogen Märks – Hur Svensk Skogcertifiering Kom Till och Dess Konsekvenser (Labelling the Forests – the Emergence and Impact of Forest Certification in Sweden), Score Rapportserie 2002, 3 Score Stockholm Google Scholar Bostro¨m, M. 2003a ‘Environmental Organisations in New Forms of Political Participation: Ecological Modernisation and the Making of Voluntary Rules’ Environmental Values 12 175 193 Google Scholar Bostro¨m, M. 2003b ‘How State-Dependent is a Non-State-Driven Rule-Making Project? The Case of Forest Certification in Sweden’ Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 5 165 180 CrossRef Google Scholar Cashore, B. 2002 ‘Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 15 503 529 Google Scholar Cashore, B., Auld, G., Newsom, D. 2004Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority Yale University Press New Haven, CT Google Scholar Clapp, J. 1998 ‘The Privatisation of Global Environmental Governance: ISO 14000 and the Developing World’ Global Governance 4 295 316 Google Scholar Cutler, A. Claire Virginia, Haufler Tony, Porter eds. 1999Private Authority and International Affairs SUNY Press Albany Google Scholar Dahl, L. 2001FSC i Praktiken (FSC in Practice) Swedish Society for Nature Conservation and WWF Stockholm Google Scholar Elliott, C. 1999Forest Certification: Analysis from a Policy Network Perspective Ecole Polytechnique de Lausanne Lausanne Google Scholar Elliott, C., Schlaepfer, R. 2001 ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Application to the Policy Process for the Development of Forest Certification in Sweden’ Journal of European Public Policy 8 642 661 CrossRef Google Scholar Framstad, K.F. 1996 ‘Environmental Effects of Public Forestry Incentives in Finland, Norway and Sweden’ Journal of Forest Economics 2 289 313 Google Scholar Gulbrandsen, L. H. 2003 ‘The Evolving Forest Regime and Domestic Actors: Strategic or Normative Adaptation?’ Environmental Politics 12 95 114 CrossRef Google Scholar Gulbrandsen, L. H. 2004 ‘Overlapping Public and Private Governance: Can Forest Certification Fill the Gaps in the Global Forest Regime?’ Global Environmental Politics 4 75 99 CrossRef Google Scholar Hall, R.B. Biersteker, T.J. eds. 2002The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance Cambridge University Press Cambridge Google Scholar
Hellstro¨m, E. (2001) ‘Conflict Cultures – Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Environmental Conflicts in Forestry’, in
Silva Fennica Monographs 2. Helsinki: Finnish Society of Forest Science. Humphreys, D. 1996Forest Politics. The Evolution of International Cooperation Earthscan London Google Scholar
Jensen, S. W. (2000), ‘Skogbrukets Miljøkomplott’ (Forestry’s environmental conspiracy), Aftenposten, 5 February 2000.
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., Zito, A. R. 2003a “New” Instruments of Environmental Governance: Patterns and Pathways of Change’ Environmental Politics 12 3 24 CrossRef Google Scholar Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., Zito, A. R. 2003b “New” Environmental Policy Instruments: An Evolution or a Revolution in Environmental Policy?’ Environmental Politics 12 201 224 Google Scholar Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., Zito, A. R., Bru¨ckner, L., et al. 2004 ‘Consumer Responsibility-Taking and Eco-label Schemes in Europe’ Micheletti, M. eds. Politics, Products and Markets Transaction Press New Brunswick, NJ Google Scholar
Living Forests (1998a).
Final Report from the Living Forests’ Working Group 2. Oslo: Living Forests Report 11.
Living Forests (1998b),
The Final Standard Documents from Living Forests. Oslo: Living Forests Report 9a–d. Mäntyranta, H. 2002Forest Certification – An Ideal That Became an Absolute Metsälehti Kustannus Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy Google Scholar Meidinger, E., Elliott, C., Oesten, G. 2003Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification Forstbuch Remagen-Oberwinter Google Scholar National Board of Forestry/Statistics Sweden 2003Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2003 National Board of Forestry Jo¨nko¨ping Google Scholar NSCBI (National Standing Committee on Business and Industry) 1999Recommendation S 208, 1998–99, Instilling fra Næringskomiteen om Verdiskapning og Miljømuligheter i Skogsektoren (Recommendation from the National Standing Committee on Business and Industry on economic growth and the environment in the forestry sector) Stortinget Oslo Google Scholar Raines, Susan Summers 2003 ‘Perceptions of Legitimacy and Efficacy in International Environmental Management Standards: The Impact of the Participation Gap’ Global Environmental Politics 3 47 73 CrossRef Google Scholar Rametsteiner, E. 1999Sustainable Forest Management Certification – Framework Conditions, Systems Designs and Impact Assessment MCPFE Liasion unit Vienna Google Scholar
Rametsteiner, E. (2002) ‘The Role of Governments in Forest Certification – a Normative Analysis Based on New Instititutional Economic Theories’,
Forest Policy and Economics, (4), 163–173. Rametsteiner, E., Simula, M. 2003 ‘Forest Certification – An Instrument to Promote Sustainable Forest Management?’ Journal of Environmental Management 67 87 98 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Swedish FSC-Council 1998Swedish FSC Standard for Forest Certification Swedish FSC-Council Uppsala Google Scholar Sæther, B. 1998 ‘Environmental Improvements in the Norwegian Pulp and Paper Industry – from Place and Government to Space and Market’ Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 52 181 194 Google Scholar Underdal, A., et al. 2002 ‘One Question, Two Answers’ Miles, E. L. eds. Environmental Regime Effectiveness. Confronting Theory with Evidence MIT Press Cambridge, MA Google Scholar Young, O. R, Levy, M. A. 1999 ‘The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regiems’ Young, O. R. eds. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms MIT Press Cambridge, MA Google Scholar Young, O. R. 2002The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit Interplay and Scale MIT Press Cambridge, MA Google Scholar