Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Political Forgiveness’ Transformative Potentials

  • Published:
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to the theoretical and empirical understandings of the role that political forgiveness plays in the post-conflict and post-authoritarian societies. The paper provides a discussion of the complexities of the concept of political forgiveness, and offers empirical examples that demonstrate the different capacities and potentials that political forgiveness has as a mode of social reconciliation and repair the past injustice. It argues that today, with the accumulation of experience in the practice of transitional justice, and the growing importance of human rights regime, considering of forgiveness through the accountability’s lens is very timely and important. After the discussion of the contribution of forgiveness to societal reconstruction in the post-conflict and post-authoritarian societies, the paper focuses on the role of forgiveness as an essential part of justice and solidarity. By scrutinising forgiveness’ links with reconciliation and justice, the paper offers a comprehensive way to assess the nature of preconditions and the role of forgiveness in addressing the past injustice and overcoming divisions in post-conflict societies. Its discussion of empirical findings on the role that forgiveness opens up a debate about risks and costs involved in a policy of forgiveness in newly democratised countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, J. (2006). The civil sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. (2003). Grand narratives and the project of truth commissions: a comparative analysis. Media, Culture and Society, 25(1), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1971). Man in dark times. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, P. (2002). Conflict, memory and reconciliation. In M. Elliott (Ed.), The long road to peace in Northern Ireland (pp. 143–153). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, P. (2004). Memory, forgiveness and conflict: trust-building. In E. Bort (Ed.), Commemorating Ireland (pp. 68–78). Dublin: Irish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babic, J. (2000). Justifying forgiveness. Peace Review, 12(1), 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D., & Hayes, B. C. (2011). Victims as moral beacons: victims and perpetrators in Northern Ireland. Contemporary Social Science, 6(1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, K. (2000). The South African truth commission. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. (2010). The Gacaca courts, post-genocide justice and reconciliation in Rwanda. Cambridge: Cambridge Studies in Law and Societies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • David, R., & Choi, S. Y. P. (2006). Forgiveness and transitional justice in Czech Republic. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(3), 339–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, R., & Choi, S. Y. P. (2012). Lustration systems and trust. American Journal of Sociology,117(4):117–1201.

  • Derrida, J. (2001). On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. Trans. M. Dooley and M. Hughes. London: Routledge.

  • Digeser, P. E. (2001). Political forgiveness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1989). The cement of society: a study of social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Noble, M. (2013). The peculiar convergence of Jeffrey Alexander and Eric Olin Wright. Theory and Society, 42, 617–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1959). Studies in a dying colonialism. trans. Haakon Chevalier. New York: Monthly Review Press.

  • Fanon, F. (1961). The wretched of the earth. Preface by Jean-Paul Sartre, tans. Constance Farrington. New York: Grove Press.

  • Fanon, F. (1986). Black skin, white masks. trans. Charles Lam Markmann. London: Pluto Press.

  • Fletcher, L. E., & Weinstein, H. M. (2002). Violence and social repair: rethinking the contribution of justice to reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly, 24, 73–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (2012). Introduction. In B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, & S. Schram (Eds.), Real social science. Applied phronesis (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (2001). After violence: reconciliation, reconstruction and resolution. In M. Abu-Nimer (Ed.), Recompilation, justice, and co-existence. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, N. C. (2003). Fanon. The postcolonial imagination. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girswold, C. L. (2007). Forgiveness. A philosophical exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Go, J. (2013). Fanon’s post colonial cosmopolitanism. European Journal of Social Theory, 16(2), 208–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graybill, L. S. (2002). Truth and reconciliation in South Africa. Miracle or model? Boulder: Lynne Runnier Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamber, B. (2009). Transforming societies after political violence. Truth reconciliation and mental health. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2011) at http://www.hrw.org/reports/2011/05/31/justice-compromised-0. Accessed 06 24 2014.

  • Ignatieff, M. (1998). The warrior’s honor. London: Chatto&Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. W. (2009). South Africa’s brave new world. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (2013). Fanon’s travels in postcolonial theory and post-apartheid politics. College Literature, 40(2), 52–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocek, J (2008). A politics of forgiveness for intractable conflicts: the role of middle-range, religious peacemakers in the Northern Ireland conflict. Quest Issue, 7 Autumn http://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/QUEST/FileStore/Issue7Mitchell/Filetoupload,146263,en.pdf Accessed 12 Jun 2014.

  • Kristeva, J. (2001). Hannah arendt. trans by R. Guberman. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Landman, T. (2012). Phronesis and narrative analysis. In B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, & S. Schram (Eds.), Real social science. Applied phronesis (pp. 27–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, P. (1986). The drowned and the saved. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, W. J., & Brecke, P. (2003). War and reconciliation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, P. (2011). Paradoxes and challenges of transitional justice at the ‘local’ level. Contemporary Social Science, 6(1), 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, R. (2000). Amnesty: the burden of victims. In C. Villa-Vicencio & W. Verwoerd (Eds.), Looking back, reaching forward (pp. 184–192). Cape Town: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinder, L., & McEvoy, K. (2011). Rethinking amnesties atrocity, accountability and impunity in post-conflict societies. Contemporary Social Science, 6(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (1996). Reconciliation without justice. Southern African Review of Books, 16, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2013). The logic of Nuremberg. London Review of Books, 7, 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2014). Beyond Nuremberg: the historical significance of the post-apartheid transition in South Africa. Politics and Society, 1, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, J. (2011). Managing culture in post-conflict societies. Contemporary Social Science, 6(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGonegal, J. (2009). Imagining justice. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness. Facing history after genocide and mass violence. New York: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. A. (2003). Theories of social remembering. Maidenhead: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, C. J. (2000). Constructive and destructive post-conflict forgiveness. Peace Review, 12(1), 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa, F., Straker, G., & Eagle, G. (2004). In the aftermath of political trauma: what price forgiveness? In C. Ransley & T. Spy (Eds.), Forgiveness and the healing process (pp. 128–150). Hove: Brunner –Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, J. (1987). Wrongdoing and forgiveness philosophy, 62(242), 499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2013: 3) Political emotions. Why love matters for justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.

  • Olick, J. K. (2007). The politics of regret. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A., & Reiter, A. G. (2012). Amnesty in the age of accountability: Brazil in comparative context. In B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, & S. Schram (Eds.), Real social science. Applied phronesis (pp. 204–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history and forgetting. Trans Kathleen Blamey and David Pelleauer Chicago; Chicago UP

  • Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, A. (2005). Political reconciliation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekyi-Out, A. (2003). Fanon and the possibility of postcolonial imagination. http://abahlali.org/files/Sekyi_Otu.pdf. Accessed 03 5 2015

  • Shriver, D. (1995). An ethic for enemies. Forgiveness in politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1950) The sociology of Georg Simmel. trans. and ed. by K. H. Wolff. New York: Free Press.

  • Todorov, T. (2009). Memory as remedy for evil. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7, 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2003). Who’s sorry now? Time Literary Supplement, 1, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. A. (2001). The politics of truth and reconciliation in South, Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara A. Misztal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Misztal, B.A. Political Forgiveness’ Transformative Potentials. Int J Polit Cult Soc 29, 1–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-015-9200-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-015-9200-8

Keywords

Navigation