International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 598–610

Measuring the Toughness of Primate Foods and its Ecological Value

  • Peter W. Lucas
  • Lynn Copes
  • Paul J. Constantino
  • Erin R. Vogel
  • Janine Chalk
  • Mauricio Talebi
  • Mariana Landis
  • Mark Wagner
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10764-011-9540-9

Cite this article as:
Lucas, P.W., Copes, L., Constantino, P.J. et al. Int J Primatol (2012) 33: 598. doi:10.1007/s10764-011-9540-9

Abstract

The mechanical properties of plant foods play an important role in the feeding process, being one of many criteria for food acceptance or rejection by primates. One of the simplest justifications for this statement is the general finding that primates tend to avoid foods with high fiber. Although fiber is largely tasteless, odorless, and colorless, it imparts texture, a sensation in the mouth related to the physical properties of foods. All primates encounter such mechanical resistance when they bite into plant food, and studies on humans show that an incisal bite facilitates quick oral assessment of a property called toughness. Thus, it is feasible that primates make similar assessments of quality in this manner. Here, we review methods of measuring the toughness of primate foods, which can be used either for making general surveys of the properties of foods available to primates or for establishing the mechanisms that protect these foods from the evolved form of the dentition.

Keywords

Fiber contentMethodsPlant cell wallsPrimate feeding toughness

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter W. Lucas
    • 1
  • Lynn Copes
    • 2
  • Paul J. Constantino
    • 3
  • Erin R. Vogel
    • 4
  • Janine Chalk
    • 5
  • Mauricio Talebi
    • 6
  • Mariana Landis
    • 7
  • Mark Wagner
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Bioclinical Sciences, Faculty of DentistryKuwait UniversitySafatKuwait
  2. 2.School of Human Evolution and Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesCollege of ScienceHuntingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyRutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  5. 5.Center for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, Department of AnthropologyThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  6. 6.Departamento de Ciencias BiologicasUniversidade Federal de São PauloDiademaBrazil
  7. 7.Pró-Muriqui Association, Parque Estadual Carlos BotelhoSão Miguel ArcanjoBrazil
  8. 8.School of Engineering and Applied ScienceThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA