DEVELOPING A TEST FOR ASSESSING ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION OF SCIENCE TEXTS
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study reports on the process of developing a test to assess students’ reading comprehension of scientific materials and on the statistical results of the verification study. A combination of classic test theory and item response theory approaches was used to analyze the assessment data from a verification study. Data analysis indicates the test has satisfactory validity and reliability. The Reading Comprehension of Science Test (RCST) components have a wide range of difficulty, which suggests that the RCST is appropriate for a relatively large percentage of students. Based on the accepted relationships among science, language, and literacy, integrated literacy–science instructions are highly recommended.
- Bond, L. A. (1996). Norm- and criteria-referenced testing. ERIC®/AE Digest Series EDO-TM-96-09. Available from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=2
- DeAyala, R. J. (2008). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford.
- Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. CrossRef
- Glynn, S. M. & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1057–1073. CrossRef
- Goldman, S. R. & Bisanz, G. L. (2002). Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. In J. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Guthrie, J. T. & Taboada, A. (2004). Fostering the cognitive strategies of reading comprehension. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension (pp. 87–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
- Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage.
- Lien, A. J. (1971). Measurement and evaluation of learning (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
- Liu, C.-Y., Hung, Y.-T., Chuang, Y.-L., Chen, Y.-J., Weng, W.-S., Liu, J.-S. & Liang, K.-Y. (2006). Incorporating development stratification of Taiwan townships into sampling design of large scale health interview survey. Journal of Health Management, 4(1), 1–22.
- Lumsden, J. (1961). The construction of unidimensional tests. Psychological Bulletin, 58(2), 122–131. CrossRef
- Mayer, R. E. (1992). Guiding students’ cognitive processing of scientific information in text. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 242–258). New York: Academic Press.
- Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107. CrossRef
- Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Norris, S. P. & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. CrossRef
- Norris, S. P. & Phillips, L. M. (2005, February). Reading as inquiry. Paper presented at the Inquiry Conference on Developing a Consensus Research Agenda, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
- Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Osterlind, S. J. (2006). Modern measurement: Theory, principles, and applications of mental appraisal. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Pearson, P. D., Moje, E. B. & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. CrossRef
- Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N. & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 228–247). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Quellmalz, E. & Hoskyn, J. (1997). Classroom assessment of reasoning strategies. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, adjustment, and achievement (pp. 103–130). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Rouet, J.-F. & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2002). Mining for meaning: Cognitive effects of inserted questions in learning from scientific text. In J. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 417–436). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Shepardson, D. P. & Gummer, E. S. (2001). A framework for thinking about and planning classroom assessments in science. In D. P. Shepardson (Ed.), Assessment in science: A guide to professional development and classroom practice (pp. 83–98). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
- Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452. CrossRef
- Sutton, C. (1992). Words, science and learning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
- Vitale, M. R. & Romance, N. R. (2009). A research-based model for integrating elementary science and reading comprehension: Implications for research and practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. New York: Wiley. CrossRef
- Wang, J.-R. & Lin, S.-W. (2009). Evaluating elementary and secondary school science learning environments in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 853–872. CrossRef
- Wellington, J. & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
- Yore, L. D. (2009, November). Science literacy for all: More than a logo or rally flag! [Keynote address]. Proceedings of the International Science Education Conference 2009. Singapore (pp. 2393–2427).
- Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L. & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725. CrossRef
- Yore, L. D., Craig, M. T. & Maguire, T. O. (1998). Index of science reading awareness: An interactive-constructive model, test verification, and grades 4–8 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 27–51. CrossRef
- DEVELOPING A TEST FOR ASSESSING ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION OF SCIENCE TEXTS
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Volume 10, Issue 4 , pp 955-973
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- reading comprehension
- science texts