CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT: CONSTRUCTIVIST PRIMARY MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM IN TURKEY
 İsmet Şahin
 … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Abstract
Many national and international studies put forward the idea that primary education in Turkey is questionable in many aspects. As a result, the Ministry of National Education changed primary curriculums in 2004 in Turkey. The curriculum for primary mathematics was redeveloped taking into consideration constructivist theory of education. The purpose of this study is to assess the qualities of the 2004 mathematics curriculum using a goaloriented curriculum evaluation model in which the intrinsic value of the curriculum is examined in terms of its qualities and success depending on teachers’ perspectives, as they are one of the most important elements of the teaching–learning situation. The results show that the qualities of the 2004 mathematics curriculum match the criteria of a constructivist curriculum as set out in the literature. Also, the level of performance expected from the teachers’ perspective as those who instruct in the curriculum is very high. The results point to the fact that the 2004 mathematics curriculum may be considered as a positive change even if there is room for improvement in all aspects.
 Albayrak, M., & Aydın, Y. (2002). 1983’ten 2002’ye İlköğretim Matematik Dersi programı. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi. Ankara: ODTÜ.
 Alkan, C., Deryakulu, D., & Şimşek, N. (1995). Eğitim Teknolojisine Giriş. Ankara: ıÜüÖnder Matbaacılık.
 Brousseau, G. (1987). Les differents roles du maitre. Colloque des P.E.N. Angers. In S. A. Martin (Ed.), Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective (1993). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
 Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).
 Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (1997).The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).
 CDE California Department of Education (1992). Mathematics Framework for California public schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
 Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers [Monograph]. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).
 Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching [Monograph]. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).
 Cunningham, D. J. (1991). Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue. Educational Technology, 31, 13–17. Retrieved from: www.proguest.com in 05.11.2004.
 Ding, Z. & Guo, R. (2005). Comments on the development of curriculum evaluation theories in 20th century. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method. no. 4, pages 11–17. China. Retrieved 15th Jan 2009 from http://www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/en/ctmm/200500000004/0011.htm.
 Draper, R. J. (2002). School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reformoriented math classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 520–529.
 EARGED (2002) ÖBBS 2002 Durum Belirleme Raporu, MEB, 2003.
 Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. Basingstoke: Falmer.
 Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society—teaching, schooling, and literate discourses. In Draper, R. J. (Eds.), School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reformoriented math classroom (2002). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 520–529.
 Gürol, M., Demirli C. (2003). Uzaktan Eğitimde Oluşturmacı Tasarım ve Uygulanması. Retrieved at 17.11.2004 from http://www.fenokulu.net/bilcal44.htm.
 IEA (2003). PRILLS 2001, International report: Study of reading literacy achievement, primary school in 35 countries. The Hague: IEA.
 Kamii, C. (1985). Can there be excellence in education without knowledge of child development?. Chicago, IL: Chicago Association for the Education of Young Children (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 254 333).
 Kamii. C. & Lewis. B. A. (1990). What is constructivism? In Brewer, J., & Daane, C. J. (Eds.), Translating constructivist theory into practice in primary grade mathematics. Education. Vol 123, No 2. (pp. 416–421).
 Martin, S. A. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics Pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Washington, D.C: National Science Foundation.
 MEB (2004). Yeni Matematik Dersi Programı ve Kılavuzu. Ankara: MEB Yayınevi.
 Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional Design and Learning Theory. Ret. From: www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/mergel/brenda.html
 NCES (2001). TIMMSR—highlights from the third international mathematics and science studyrepeat in 1999. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.
 NCTMNational Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation Standards: The school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 NCTM—National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results of PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
 Olkun, S., & Toluk, Z. (2003). İlköğretimde Etkinlik Temelli Matematik Öğretimi. Ankara: ANI Yayıncılık.
 Özden, Y. (2003). Öğrenmeye Farklı Bir Bakış: Yapılandırmacılık, Öğrenme and Öğretme. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
 Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1992). Creating constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).
 Schifter, D. (1996). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning mathematics. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 492–499.
 Semerci, Ç. (2001). Oluşturmacılık Kuramına Göre Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 429–440. Pegem Yay. Ankara.
 Spinner, H., & Fraser, B., J, (2002). Evaluation of an innovative mathematics program in terms of classroom environment, student attitudes, and conceptual development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 1–5, 2002).
 Taylor, P., &. Fraser, B. (1991). CLES. An instrument for assessing constructivist learning environments. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).
 Tezci, E., & Gürol, A. (2003). Oluşturmacı Öğretim Tasarımı ve Yaratıcılık. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology—TOJET, 2(1), 8.
 von Glaserfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19–30). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).
 Vural, M. (2003). İlköğretim Programları. Erzurum: Yakutiye Yayıncılık.
 Wilson, B. G. (Ed.) (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
 Wolf, P., Hill, A., & Evers, F. (2006). Handbook for curriculum assessment. Ontario: University of Guelph. Ret. 15th Jan 2009 from: http://www.tss.uoguelph.ca/resources/pdfs/HbonCurriculumAssmt.pdf.
 World Bank (2005). Turkey education sector study. Report Number 32450TU. Washington, DC: World Bank.
 Worthen and Sanders (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. London: Longman.
 Title
 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT: CONSTRUCTIVIST PRIMARY MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM IN TURKEY
 Journal

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Volume 8, Issue 1 , pp 5172
 Cover Date
 20100201
 DOI
 10.1007/s1076300991622
 Print ISSN
 15710068
 Online ISSN
 15731774
 Publisher
 Springer Netherlands
 Additional Links
 Topics
 Keywords

 constructivism
 curriculum reform in Turkey
 elementary mathematics
 mathematics curriculum
 Authors

 İsmet Şahin ^{(1)}
 Author Affiliations

 1. Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education, University of Kocaeli, Umuttepe Kampusu, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey