Albayrak, M., & Aydın, Y. (2002).

*1983’ten 2002’ye İlköğretim Matematik Dersi programı. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi*. Ankara: ODTÜ.

Google ScholarAlkan, C., Deryakulu, D., & Şimşek, N. (1995).

*Eğitim Teknolojisine Giriş*. Ankara: ıÜüÖnder Matbaacılık.

Google ScholarBrousseau, G. (1987). Les differents roles du maitre. Colloque des P.E.N. Angers. In S. A. Martin (Ed.),

*Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective (1993)*. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Google ScholarBrooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).

Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (1997).The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).

CDE- California Department of Education (1992).

*Mathematics Framework for California public schools*. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.

Google ScholarCobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers [Monograph]. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).

Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching [Monograph]. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).

Cunningham, D. J. (1991). Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue.

*Educational Technology*,

*31*, 13–17. Retrieved from:

www.proguest.com in 05.11.2004.

Google ScholarDing, Z. & Guo, R. (2005). Comments on the development of curriculum evaluation theories in 20th century.

*Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method*. no. 4, pages 11–17. China. Retrieved 15th Jan 2009 from

http://www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/en/ctmm/200500000004/0011.htm.

Draper, R. J. (2002). School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reform-oriented math classroom.

*Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy*,

*45*, 520–529.

Google ScholarEARGED (2002) ÖBBS 2002 Durum Belirleme Raporu, MEB, 2003.

Ernest, P. (1991).

*The philosophy of mathematics education*. Basingstoke: Falmer.

Google ScholarGallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society—teaching, schooling, and literate discourses. In Draper, R. J. (Eds.), School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reform-oriented math classroom (2002). *Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy*, *45*, 520–529.

Gürol, M., Demirli C. (2003). Uzaktan Eğitimde Oluşturmacı Tasarım ve Uygulanması. Retrieved at 17.11.2004 from

http://www.fenokulu.net/bilcal44.htm.

IEA (2003).

*PRILLS 2001, International report: Study of reading literacy achievement, primary school in 35 countries*. The Hague: IEA.

Google ScholarKamii, C. (1985).

*Can there be excellence in education without knowledge of child development?*. Chicago, IL: Chicago Association for the Education of Young Children (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 254 333).

Google ScholarKamii. C. & Lewis. B. A. (1990). What is constructivism? In Brewer, J., & Daane, C. J. (Eds.), Translating constructivist theory into practice in primary grade mathematics. Education. Vol 123, No 2. (pp. 416–421).

Martin, S. A. (1993).

*Reconstructing mathematics Pedagogy from a constructivist perspective*. Washington, D.C: National Science Foundation.

Google ScholarMEB (2004).

*Yeni Matematik Dersi Programı ve Kılavuzu*. Ankara: MEB Yayınevi.

Google ScholarMergel, B. (1998). Instructional Design and Learning Theory. Ret. From:

www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/mergel/brenda.html
NCES (2001).

*TIMMS-R—highlights from the third international mathematics and science study-repeat in 1999*. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.

Google ScholarNCTM-National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989).

*Curriculum and evaluation Standards: The school mathematics*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Google ScholarNCTM—National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991).

*Professional standards for teaching mathematics*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Google ScholarOECD (2004).

*Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results of PISA 2003*. Paris: OECD.

Google ScholarOlkun, S., & Toluk, Z. (2003).

*İlköğretimde Etkinlik Temelli Matematik Öğretimi*. Ankara: ANI Yayıncılık.

Google ScholarÖzden, Y. (2003).

*Öğrenmeye Farklı Bir Bakış: Yapılandırmacılık, Öğrenme and Öğretme*. Ankara: Pegem-A Yayıncılık.

Google ScholarPirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1992). Creating constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).

Schifter, D. (1996). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning mathematics.

*Phi Delta Kappan*,

*77*, 492–499.

Google ScholarSemerci, Ç. (2001). Oluşturmacılık Kuramına Göre Ölçme ve Değerlendirme.

*Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi*,

*1*(2), 429–440. Pegem Yay. Ankara.

Google ScholarSpinner, H., & Fraser, B., J, (2002). Evaluation of an innovative mathematics program in terms of classroom environment, student attitudes, and conceptual development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 1–5, 2002).

Taylor, P., &. Fraser, B. (1991). CLES. An instrument for assessing constructivist learning environments. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).

Tezci, E., & Gürol, A. (2003). Oluşturmacı Öğretim Tasarımı ve Yaratıcılık.

*The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology—TOJET*,

*2*(1), 8.

Google Scholarvon Glaserfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.),

*Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics* (pp. 19–30). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Google Scholarvon Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In Calhoun, D. O., Bohlin, C., Rohlin, R. &; Tracz, S. (Eds.), The mathematics reform movement: Assessing the degree of reform in secondary mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24–28, 1997).

Vural, M. (2003).

*İlköğretim Programları*. Erzurum: Yakutiye Yayıncılık.

Google ScholarWilson, B. G. (Ed.) (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Wolf, P., Hill, A., & Evers, F. (2006).

*Handbook for curriculum assessment*. Ontario: University of Guelph. Ret. 15th Jan 2009 from:

http://www.tss.uoguelph.ca/resources/pdfs/HbonCurriculumAssmt.pdf.

Google ScholarWorld Bank (2005).

*Turkey education sector study. Report Number 32450-TU*. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Google ScholarWorthen and Sanders (1987).

*Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines*. London: Longman.

Google Scholar