Arzi, H. & White, R.T. (1986). Questions on students’ questions. Research in Science Education
Barak, M. & Dori, Y.J. (2005). Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment. Science Education
Barnea, N. (2004). Towards the new chemistry curriculum in high-schools. Alchemy- Bulletin For Chemistry Teachers, 5, 3–4. (in Hebrew).
Barnea, N. (2002). Updating high school chemistry syllabus: the process of change. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Chemical Education (17th ICCE), Beijing, China.
Barnea, N. & Dori, Y.J. (2000). Computerized molecular modeling–The new technology for enhancing model perception among chemistry educators and learners. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 109–120.
Becker, R. (2000). The critical role of students’ questions in literacy development. The Educational Forum
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1 the Cognitive Domain. New York: Mckay.
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Research council, National Academy press.
Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F. & Mocerino, M. (2007). An evaluation of a teaching intervention to promote students’ ability to use multilple levels of representation when describing and explaining chemical reactions. Research in Science Education, On line first.
Coll, R.K. & Treagust, D.F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Dillon, J.T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies
Dori, Y.J. (2003). From nationwide standardized testing to school-based alternative embedded assessment in Israel: Students’ performance in the “Matriculation 2000” project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Dori, Y.J. & Barak, M. (2001). Virtual and physical molecular modeling: Fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology & Society, 4, 61–74.
Dori, Y.J., Barak, M. & Adir, N. (2003). A web-based chemistry course as a means to foster freshmen learning. Journal of Chemical Education
Dori, Y.J., Barak, M., Herscovitz, O. & Carmi, M. (2006). Preparing pre- and in-service teachers to teach high school science with technology. In C. Vrasidas & G.V. Glass (Eds.), Preparing teachers to teach with technology, 2nd Volume of the book series: Current perspectives on applied information technologies. Greenwich, CT, USA: Information Age Publishing.
Dori, Y.J. & Hameiri, M. (1998). The “Mole environment” studyware: Applying multidimensional analysis to quantitative chemistry problems. International Journal of Science Education, 20
Dori, Y.J. & Hameiri, M. (2003). Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems –symbol, macro, micro and process aspects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 278–302.
Dori, Y.J. & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environment case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Dori, Y.J. & Herscovitz, O. (2005). Case-based long-term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education
Dori, Y.J. & Sasson, I. (2008). Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: The value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Dori, Y.J., Sasson, I., Kaberman, Z. & Herscovitz, O. (2004). Integrating case-based computerized laboratories into high school chemistry. The Chemical Educator, 9, 1–5.
Dori, Y.J. & Tal, R.T. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education
Dori, Y.J., Tal, R.T. & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies Can we improve higher order thinking skills of non–science majors? Science Education
Furio, C., Calatayud, M.L., Barcenas, S.L. & Padilla, O.M. (2000). Functional fixedness and functional reductions as common sense reasonings in chemical equilibrium and in geometry and polarity of molecules. Science Education
Gabel, D.L. (1998). The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching. In B.J. Fraser & K.J. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 233–248). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
German, P.J., Aram, R. & Burke, J. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh–grade students to the science process skill of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Gilbert, J.K., De Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D.F. & Van Driel, J.H. (2002). Research and development for the future of chemical education.. In J.K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justy, D.F. Treagust & J.H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (391–408). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education
Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (1998). Modelling in science lessons: Are there better ways to learn with models? School Science and Mathematics
Hofstein, A., Levy Nahum, T. & Shore, R. (2001). Assessment of the learning environment of inquiry-type laboratories in high-school chemistry. Learning Environments Research
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V.N. (1982). The role of laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 201–217.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education
Hofstein, A., Shore, R. & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory–A case study. International Journal of Science Education
Johnstone, A.H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Kaberman, Z. & Dori, Y.J. (2008). Metacognition in chemical education: Question posing in the case-based computerized learning environment. Instructional Science. In press.
Keig, P.F. & Rubba, P.A. (1993). Translation of representations of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Kozma, R. & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence.. In J.K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education
(pp. 121–145). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef
Kozma, R.B. & Russel, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Marbach–Ad, G. & Claassen, L. (2001). Improving students’ questions in inquiry labs. American Biology Teacher
Marbach–Ad, G. & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (1996). National education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Pintrich, P.R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory into Practice
Sasson, I. & Dori, Y.J. (2006). Fostering near and far transfer in the chemistry case-based laboratory environment.. In G. Clarebout & J. Elen (Eds.), Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity: Advance in studying and designing powerful (computer-based) learning environments (pp. 275–286). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Singer, H. (1978). Active comprehension: From answering to asking questions. Reading Teacher, 31, 901–908.
Small, M.Y. & Morton, M.E. (1983). Research in college science teaching: Spatial visualization training improves performances in organic chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 13, 41–43.
Tamir, P., Nussinovitz, R. & Friedler, Y. (1982). The design and use of a practical tests assessment inventory. Journal of Biological Education, 16, 42–50.
Tobin, K. (1990). Teacher mind frames and science learning.. In K. Tobin, J.B. Kahle & B.J. Fraser (Eds.), Windows into science classrooms (pp. 33–91). New York, Philadelphia: The Falmer Press, London.
White, R.T. & Arzi, H.J. (2005). Longitudinal studies: Designs, validity, practicality, and value. Research in Science Education
Woodward, C. (1992). Raising and answering questions in primary science: Some considerations. Evaluation and Research in Education
Wu, H.K., Krajcik, J.S. & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Wu, H.K. & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuo-spatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education
Zohar, A. & Dori, Y.J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences
Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Zoller, U. (1993). Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: Unlikely for HOCS. Journal of Chemical Education
Zoller, U. (2002). Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: performance and attitudes of college students. International Journal of Science Education, 24