Formative Assessment Pre-Test to Identify College Students’ Prior Knowledge, Misconceptions and Learning Difficulties in Biology
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
A formative assessment pretest was administered to undergraduate students at the beginning of a science course in order to find out their prior knowledge, misconceptions and learning difficulties on the topic of the human respiratory system and energy issues. Those findings could provide their instructors with the valuable information required in order to adapt their teaching methods to the students’ needs. The test included open-ended questions and was administered on the first day of the course. The data obtained were analysed in relation to the students’ gender, age and having attended or not attended advanced courses in biology at the high-school level. Students could have prior knowledge on a topic to be learned, which, if identified and accounted for in the teaching, could serve as a receptor for a constructivist mode of study. The results indicated that undergraduate students hold misconceptions which could obstruct the acquisition of new knowledge. They encounter learning difficulties, which, if are known to the instructors and addressed in their teaching, could facilitate students’ learning. The possible use of a formative pre-assessment procedure, which could guide the instruction and learning process from the beginning of a course, is discussed.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Anderson, D.L., Fisher, K.M. & Norman, G.J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952–978. CrossRef
- Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Biggs, J.B. (1980). Developmental processes and learning outcomes. In J.R. Kirby & J.B. Biggs (Eds.), Cognition development and instruction. London: Academic Press.
- Bishop, A.B. & Anderson, C.W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 415–428. CrossRef
- Black, P.J. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21, 49–97.
- Black, P.J. (1995). Can teachers use assessment to improve learning? British Journal of Curriculum & Assessment, 5(2), 7–11.
- Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–75. CrossRef
- Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1. Cognitive domain. London: Longman.
- Brattstorm, B.H. (1999). Are students learning from their teachers or the media? The American Biology Teacher, 61(6), 420–422.
- BSCS Yellow Version, Israeli adaptation (1975). The Israeli Center for Science Teaching, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- Cowie, B. & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 101–116.
- Crooks, T.J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481. CrossRef
- Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.
- Duit, R. & Treagust, D.F. (1998). Learning in science–from behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B.J. Fraser & K.J. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–25). Great Britain: Kluwer.
- Farmer, W.A. & Farreil, M.A. (1980). Systematic instruction in science for the middle and high school years. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Finley, F., Stewart, J. & Yarroch, L. (1982). Teachers’ perceptions of important and difficult science content. Science Education, 66(4), 531–538. CrossRef
- Hegarty-Hazel, E. & Prosser, M. (1991a). Relationship between students’ conceptual knowledge and study strategies–part 1: Student learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 303–312.
- Hegarty-Hazel, E. & Prosser, M. (1991b). Relationship between students’ conceptual knowledge and study strategies–part 2: Student learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 421–430.
- Johnson, A.M. & Lawson, E.A. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 89–103. CrossRef
- Johnstone, A.H. & Mahmoud, N.A. (1980). Isolating topics of high perceived difficulty in school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 163–166.
- Karplus, R., Dawson. A., Wollman, W., Howe, A., Bernhoff, R. & Sullivan, B. (1977). Workshop on science teaching and the development of reasoning. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
- Lawson, A.E. (1988). A better way to teach biology. The American Biology Teacher, 50(5), 266–278.
- Lawson, A.E. & Renner, J.W. (1975). Relationships of science subject matter and developmental levels of learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, 347–358. CrossRef
- Lawson, A.E. & Thompson, L.D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 733–746. CrossRef
- Lawson, A.E. & Worsnop, W.A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 143–166. CrossRef
- Lazarowitz, R. (2000). Research in science, content knowledge structure, and secondary school curricula. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 48, 229–238. CrossRef
- Lazarowitz, R. & Penso, S. (1992). High school students’ difficulties in learning biology concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 215–223.
- Miller, J.C. (2002). College students’ beliefs, alternate conceptions and understanding of the theory of common descent. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). New Orleans, Louisiana, April 2002.
- Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.
- Shayer, M. (1978). The analysis of science curricula for Piagetian level of demands. Studies in Science Education, 5, 115–130.
- Shemesh, M. & Lazarowitz, R. (1989). Pupils’ reasoning skills and their mastery of biological concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 23(1), 59–63.
- Staver, J. (1986). The effects of problem format, number of independent variables, and their interaction on student performance on a control of variables, reasoning problem. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(6), 533–542. CrossRef
- Stern, L. & Mokady, O. (2004). Will dinosaurs ever appear again? University biology students’ conceptions of determinism in nature. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, (NARST). Vancouver, Canada, April 2004.
- Stern, L. & Roseman, A. (2004). Can Middle school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568. CrossRef
- Stewart, J.H. (1982). Difficulties experienced by high school students when learning basic Mendelian genetics. The American Biology Teacher, 44(2), 80–84.
- Strike, K.A., & Posner, G.J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L.H.T. West & A.L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure andconceptual change (pp. 211–231). New York: Academic Press.
- Treagust, D.F. (1988), Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169.
- Walker, R.A., Hendrix, J.R. & Mertens, R.T. (1980). Sequenced instruction in genetics and Piagetian cognitive development. The American Biology Teacher, 42(2), 104–109.
- Wright, L.E. (2004). Reform in undergraduate science teaching: university and federal perspective, pp. 12–17. International Conference on Learning and Assessment in Science, Engineering & Management in Higher Education. In O. Herscovitz (Ed.) Conference proceedings, Technion City, Haifa, Israel, December 2004.
- Zohar, A. & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education–heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679–697. CrossRef
- Formative Assessment Pre-Test to Identify College Students’ Prior Knowledge, Misconceptions and Learning Difficulties in Biology
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Volume 4, Issue 4 , pp 741-762
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- formative assessment
- naïve knowledge
- non-major college students in biology
- preconceptions and misconceptions in biology
- prior knowledge