Arcavi, A., & Hadas, N. (2000). Computer mediated learning: An example of an approach.

*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,*
*5*, 25–45.

CrossRefArtigue, M. (2007). Digital technologies: A window on theoretical issues in mathematics education. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), *Proceedings of the fifth conference of the European society for research in mathematics education* (pp. 68–82). Larnaca, Cyprus: University of Cyprus.

Berry, J. S., Graham, T., Honey, S., & Headlam, C. (2007). A case study of the issues arising when teachers adopt the use of a new form of technology in their teaching for the first time. *The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education,*
*14*, 150–160.

Bjuland, R., & Jaworski, B. (2009). Teachers’ perspectives on collaboration with didacticians to create an inquiry community.

*Research in Mathematics Education,*
*11*, 21–38.

CrossRefBretscher, N. (2010). Dynamic geometry software: The teacher’s role in facilitating instrumental genesis. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), *Proceedings of the sixth conference of the European society for research in mathematics education* (pp. 1340–1348). Lyon: INRP.

Chevallard, Y. (2007). Readjusting didactics to a changing epistemology.

*European Educational Research Journal,*
*6*, 131–134.

CrossRefCrisan, C., Lerman, S., & Winbourne, P. (2007). Mathematics and ICT: A framework for conceptualising secondary school mathematics teachers’ classroom practices.

*Technology, Pedagogy and Education,*
*16*, 21–39.

CrossRefDörfler, W. (1993). Computer use and views of the mind. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), *Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology* (pp. 159–186). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics,*
*75*, 213–234.

CrossRefErfjord, I. (2008). *Teachers’ implementation and orchestration of Cabri*-*use in mathematics teaching.* Doctoral thesis in mathematics didactics, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

Freudenthal, H. (1991). *Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures*. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms.

*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,*
*22*, 73–89.

CrossRefGoos, M., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (2009). Teachers and teaching: theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.),

*Mathematics education and technology—rethinking the Terrain. The 17th ICMI study* (pp. 311–328). New York: Springer.

CrossRefHagness, R., & Veiteberg, J. (1999). *The Curriculum for the 10-year compulsory school in Norway*. Oslo, Norway: National Centre for Educational Resources.

Hals, S. (2010). *IKT i matematikkopplæringen*–*tidstjuv eller tryllemiddel? En studie av faktorer som kan påvirke bruken av IKT generelt og GeoGebra spesielt, hos lærere og elever på 10. og 11. årstrinn.* Master thesis in mathematics didactics, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

Haspekian, M. (2005). An instrumental approach to study the integration of a computer tool into mathematics teaching: The case of spreadsheets.

*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,*
*10*, 109–141.

CrossRefHennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change.

*Journal of Curriculum Studies,*
*37*, 155–192.

CrossRefKasten, S. E., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Using dynamic geometry software in the mathematics classroom: A study of teachers’ choices and rationales. *The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education,*
*16*, 133–143.

KD. (2006).

*Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet* (English version available and retrieved August 20, 2010 from

http://www.udir.no/Tema/In-English/Curriculum-in-English/
*)*. Oslo, Norway: Utdanningsdirektoratet.

Kieran, C., & Drijvers, P. (2006). The co-emergence of machine techniques, paper-and-pencil techniques, and theoretical reflection: A study of CAS use in secondary school algebra.

*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,*
*11*, 205–226.

CrossRefLaborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-Geometry.

*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,*
*6*, 283–318.

CrossRefLaborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Strässer, R. (2006). Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), *Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future* (pp. 275–304). Rotterdam: Sense.

Lagrange, J.-B. (2005). Curriculum, classroom practices, and tool design in the learning of functions through technology-aided experimental approaches.

*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,*
*10*, 143–189.

CrossRefLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). *Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Long, J. B. (1987). Cognitive ergonomics and human-computer interaction. In P. Warr (Ed.), *Psychology at work* (Third ed. ed., pp. 73–95). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Monaghan, J. (2001). Teachers’ classroom interaction in ICT-based mathematics lessons. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), *Proceedings of the 25th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 3-383–3-390)*. Utrecht: Freudenthal institute.

Monaghan, J. (2004). Teachers’ activities in technology-based mathematics lessons.

*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,*
*9*, 327–357.

CrossRefMonaghan, J. (2007). Computer algebra, instrumentation and the anthropological approach. *The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education,*
*14*, 63–71.

Rabardel, P. (2002).

*People and technology, a cognitive approach to contemporary instruments*. Retrieved August 20, 2010 from

http://ergoserv.psy.univ-paris8.fr/Site/default.asp?Act_group=1.

Trouche, L. (2003). From artifact to instrument: Mathematics teaching mediated by symbolic calculators. *Interacting with Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,*
*15*, 783–800.

Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations.

*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,*
*9*, 281–307.

CrossRefTrouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Handheld technology for mathematics education: Flashback into the future.

*ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education,*
*42*, 667–681.

CrossRefVérillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artefact: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity.

*European Journal of Psychology of Education,*
*10*, 77–101.

CrossRefVillarreal, M. E., Esteley, C. B., & Mina, M. V. (2010). Modeling empowered by information and communication technologies.

*ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education,*
*42*, 405–419.

CrossRefWagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner cooperation. *Educational Researcher,*
*26*, 13–22.

Wells, G. (1999).

*Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education*. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

CrossRef