Improving Academic Program Assessment: A Mixed Methods Study
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Starting with the premise that better assessment leads to more informed decisions about student learning, we investigated the factors that lead to assessment improvement. We used “meta-assessment” (i.e., evaluating the assessment process) to identify academic programs in which the assessment process had improved over a two-year period. The use of both quantitative and qualitative methods allowed us to understand the factors leading to assessment improvement better. Through these efforts, we discovered that a program’s assessment environment and use of resources were the predominant factors leading to improvement. One resource in particular, assessment consultation, was the most cited reason for improved assessment.
- Astin, A., Banta, T., Cross, K., El-Khawas, E., Ewell, P., Hutchings, P., Marchese, T.J., McClenney, K.M., Mentkowski, M., Miller, M.A., Moran, E.T., & Wright, B. D. (n. d.). American Association of Higher Education (AAHE) Principles of good practice for assessing student learning. Retrieved from: http://assessment.uconn.edu/docs/resources/AAHE_Principles_of_Good_Practice.pdf
- Banta, T. W. (1997). Moving assessment forward: Enabling conditions and stumbling blocks. New Directions for Higher Education, 100, 79–91. doi:10.1002/he.10007 CrossRef
- Banta, T. W., Lund, J. P., Black, K. E., & Oblander, F. W. (1996). Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing student learning and development: A guide to the principles, goals, and methods of determining college outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Fulcher, K. H., & Orem, C. D. (2010). Evolving from quantity to quality: A new yardstick for assessment. Journal of Research and Practice in Assessment, 5, 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.virginiaassessment.org/rpa/5/FulcherandOrem.pdf
- Fulcher, K.H., Swain, M., & Orem, C.D., (2012). Expectations for assessment reports: A descriptive analysis. Assessment Update, 24(1), 1–2, 14–16. doi:10.1002/au.241
- Goodrich, H. (1997). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 14–17.
- Linkon, S. (2005). How can assessment work for us? Academe Online, Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2005/JA/Feat/link.htm
- Ndoye, A., & Parker, M. A. (2010). Creating and sustaining a culture of assessment. Planning for Higher Education, 38(2), 28–39.
- Orem, C. (2012). Demonstrating validity evidence of meta-assessment scores using generalizability theory. Harrisonburg, VA: James Madison University (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
- Ory, J. C. (1992). Meta-assessment: Evaluating assessment activities. Research in Higher Education, 33, 467–481. CrossRef
- Pringle, C., & Michel, M. (2007). Assessment practices in AACSB-accredited business schools. The Journal of Education for Business, 82, 202–211. CrossRef
- Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Measuring college learning responsibly: Accountability in a new era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Improving Academic Program Assessment: A Mixed Methods Study
Innovative Higher Education
Volume 38, Issue 5 , pp 383-395
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Student learning outcomes