Oral Communication Skills in Higher Education: Using a Performance-Based Evaluation Rubric to Assess Communication Skills
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study used The Competent Speaker, a rubric developed by the National Communication Association (S. P. Morreale, M. R. Moore, K. P. Taylor, D. Surges-Tatum, & R. Hulbert-Johnson, 1993), to evaluate student performance in general education public speaking courses as a case study of student skills and programmatic assessment. Results indicate that students taking the general education public speaking course are below satisfactory standards on five of the eight competencies defined by the National Communication Association and are above satisfactory standards on two of the eight competencies. Implications for this particular program, other communication departments, and communication across the curriculum in general education are discussed. We also offer suggestions for those in other disciplines or educational settings in the use of performance evaluation rubrics for assessing other student skills/knowledge and for training new teachers.
- Allen, T. H. (2002). Charting a communication pathway: Using assessment to guide curriculum development in a re-vitalized general education plan. Communication Education, 51, 26–39. CrossRef
- Borko, H. (1997). New forms of classroom assessment: Implications for staff development. Theory Into Practice, 36, 231–238. CrossRef
- Dannels, D. P. (2001). Time to speak up: A theoretical framework of situated pedagogy and practice for communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 50, 144–158.
- Dannels, D. P. (2002). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: Speaking in engineering. Communication Education, 51, 254–268. CrossRef
- Dougan, A. M. (1996). Student assessment by portfolio: One institution's journey. The History Teacher, 29, 171–178. CrossRef
- Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing student learning and development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Erwin, T. D., & Sebrell, K. W. (2003). Assessment of critical thinking: ETS's tasks in critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 52, 50–70. CrossRef
- Goldberg, G. L., Roswell, B. S., & Michaels, H. (1996). Can assessment mirror instruction? A look at peer response and revision in a large-scale writing test. Educational Assessment, 3, 287–314. CrossRef
- Hambleton, R. K., & Plake, B. S. (1995). Using an extended Angoff procedure to set standards on complex performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 41–55. CrossRef
- Jones, E. A. (1994). Essential skills in writing, speech and listening, and critical thinking for college graduates: Perspectives of faculty, employers, and policymakers. University Park, PA: National Center for post secondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
- Kubicka, T. (2003). Private self-consciousness as a moderator variable. Unpublished Master's Thesis, California State University Long Beach.
- Mager, R. F. (1997). Measuring instructional results or got a match? (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: The Center for Effective Performance, Inc.
- McCroskey, J. C. (1982). Communication competence and performance: A research and pedagogical perspective. Communication Education, 31, 1–7.
- Morreale, S. P., Moore, M. R., Taylor, K. P., Surges-Tatum, D., & Hulbert-Johnson, R. (1993). The competent speaker speech evaluation form. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Morreale, S. P., Rubin, R. B., & Jones, E. A. (1998). Competencies for college students: Basic skills for persuading, informing, and relating. Retrieved August 18, 2003, from http://www.natcom.org/instruction.
- Newburger, C. (1996). SCANS and the “Goals 2000-Educate America Act:” External validation for expanding communication instruction requirements across the undergraduate core curriculum. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 1, 70–74.
- Office of Institutional Research at California State University, Long Beach. (2005). Institutional research: Students: Demographics. Retrieved August 6, 2005, from http://sas-web.ir.csulb.edu/IRpdfreports/genderw.pdf.
- Pomplun, M., Capps, L., & Sundbye, N. (1998). Criteria teachers use to score performance items. Educational Assessment, 5, 95–110. CrossRef
- Rockman, I. F. (2002). Strengthening connections between information literacy, general education, and assessment efforts. Library Trends, 51, 185–198.
- Rosenbaum, J. (1994). Assessment: An overview. In W. G. Christ (Ed.), Assessing communication education: A handbook for media, speech, and theater educators (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Rubin, R. B., & Graham, E. E. (1988). Communication correlates of college success: An exploratory investigation. Communication Education, 37, 14–27.
- Rubin, R. B., Graham, E. E., & Mignerey, J. T. (1990). A longitudinal study of college students’ communication competence. Communication Education, 39, 1–14.
- Rubin, R. B., & Morreale, S. P. (1996). Setting expectations for speech communication and listening. In E. A. Jones (Ed.), Preparing competent college graduates: Setting new and higher expectations for student learning (pp. 19–29). New directions for higher education, Vol. 96. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Rubin, R. B., Welch, S. A., & Buerkel, R. (1995). Performance-based assessment of high school speech instruction. Communication Education, 44, 30–39.
- Speech Communication Association. (1993). Criteria for the assessment of oral communication. Annandale, VA: SCA.
- Spitzberg, B. H. (1983). Communication competence as knowledge, skill, and impression. Communication Education, 32, 323–329. CrossRef
- Walvoord, B. E., Bardes, B., & Denton, J. (1998). Closing the feedback loop in classroom-based assessment. Assessment Update, 10(5), [Electronic Version] Retrieved January 30, 2004, from http://www.rwc.uc.edu/phillips/Assessment/AsUpdateSep98.html.
- Weimann, J. M., & Backlund, P. (1980). Current theory and research in communicative competence. Review of Educational Research, 50, 185–199.
- Oral Communication Skills in Higher Education: Using a Performance-Based Evaluation Rubric to Assess Communication Skills
Innovative Higher Education
Volume 31, Issue 2 , pp 115-128
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- general education
- evaluation rubrics
- faculty development