The propagation and dispersal of misinformation in ecology: Is there a relationship between citation accuracy and journal impact factor?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Research almost always builds upon existing, peer-reviewed literature. This is how we understand the development of ideas in our disciplines, formulate meaningful new questions, and advance our knowledge. But several of the authors of this article have noted disturbingly inaccurate reporting of our study findings when cited by others. We have also noted copying and pasting of phrases and citations from published articles in a way that distorts or even completely changes the meaning of the source. For us, this calls into question the quality and meaning of scientific advancement. It is tempting to believe that citation practices are worse in lower-impact journals, and that we can more easily rely on the quality of the logic and ideas presented in more prestigious journals. But we have noticed inaccurate citations in some high-impact journals as well. These observations led us to attempt to quantify the extent of inaccurate citation in the recently published ecological literature, to com
- Anderson, M. S., E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries & B. C. Martinson, 2007. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics 13: 437–461. CrossRef
- Bergstrom, C. T., & T. C. Bergstrom, 2006. The economics of ecology journals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 488–495. CrossRef
- Fanelli, D., 2009. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE 4: e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738. CrossRef
- Fang, F. C., R. G. Steen & A. Casadevall, 2012. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
- Harper, J. A., 2001. Citation inaccuracy in a scientific journal. A continuing issue. Science and Technology Libraries 20: 39–44. CrossRef
- Hirsch, J. E., 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 16569–16572. CrossRef
- Lawrence, P. A., 2003. The politics of publication. Nature 422: 259–261. CrossRef
- Lawrence, P. A., 2007. The mismeasurement of science. Current Biology 17: 583–585. CrossRef
- Ramos, M. A., J. G. Melo & U. P. Albuquerque. 2012. Citation behaviour in popular scientific papers: what is behind obscure citations? The case of ethnobotany. Scientometrics. pp. 1–9, doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0662-4.
- Simkin, M. V., & V. P. Roychowdhury, 2003. Read before you cite! Complex Systems 14: 269–274.
- Todd, P. A., & R. J. Ladle, 2008. Hidden dangers of a ‘citation culture’. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8: 13–16. CrossRef
- Todd, P. A., D. C. J. Yeo, D. Li & R. J. Ladle, 2007. Citing practices in ecology: can we believe our own words? Oikos 116: 1599–1601. CrossRef
- The propagation and dispersal of misinformation in ecology: Is there a relationship between citation accuracy and journal impact factor?
Volume 702, Issue 1 , pp 1-4
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa
- 2. Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa