Date: 08 Jun 2012
Characterization of hydraulic habitat and retention across different channel types; introducing a new field-based technique
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Understanding the interactions between physical habitat and aquatic biodiversity has become a key research objective in river management. River research and management practitioners are increasingly seeking new methodologies and techniques for characterizing physical habitat heterogeneity. The physical biotope has been widely employed as the standard mesoscale unit in river surveys. However, few surveys have quantified the combined physical heterogeneity at the meso- and microscale scale via a single technique. This paper describes a new field methodology for assessing variations in hydraulic habitat and retention across different channel types (e.g. step-pool, bedrock, plane-bed and pool-riffle). Hydraulic habitat and retention was measured by timing 100 flow tracers across a 100-m stream length, and recording the types of trapping structures. The pattern of flow tracers and retention varied significantly between channel types and structures. Rocks (boulders and cobbles) were more important retentive structures than eddies and snags (woody material and vegetation). The results indicate the importance of a diverse hydraulic environment, woody material and channel substrate character in increasing physical heterogeneity within a stream reach. The findings suggest that the field methodology may be an effective tool to assess differences in physical heterogeneity pre and post river restoration activities.
Handling editor: P. Nõges
Armstrong, J. D., P. S. Kemp, G. J. A. Kennedy, M. Ladle & N. J. Milner, 2003. Habitat requirement of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in rivers and streams. Fisheries Research 62: 143–170.CrossRef
Best, J. L., 1996. The fluid dynamics of small-scale alluvial bedforms. In Carling, P. A. & M. Dawson (eds), Advances in Fluvial Dynamics and Stratigraphy. Wiley, Chichester: 67–125.
Biggin, M. E. & M. J. Stewardson, 2004. Quantifying hydraulic habitat heterogeneity: the development of a flow type heterogeneity index. In Rutherford, I., I. Wiszniewski, M. Asky-Doran & R. Glazik (eds), Proceedings of the 4th Australian Stream Management Conference. Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, 19–22 October 2004, Launceston, Tasmania: 78–83.
Billi, P., 1988. A note on cluster bedform behaviour in a gravel-bed river. Catena 15: 473–481.CrossRef
Boon, P. J., 1998. River restoration in five dimensions. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 257–264.CrossRef
Boon, P. J., 2004. The development of integrated methods for assessing river conservation value. Hydrobiologia 422(423): 413–428.
Braaten, P. J. & C. R. Berry, 1997. Fish associations with four habitat types in a South Dakota prairie stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 12: 1522–1529.
Brayshaw, A. C., 1984. The characteristics and origin of cluster bedforms in coarse-grained alluvial channels. In Koster, C. H. & R. H. Stell (eds), Sedimentology of Gravels and Conglomerates. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 10: 77–85.
Brayshaw, A. C., 1985. Bed microtopography and entrainment thresholds in gravel-bed rivers. Geological Society of America Bulletin 96: 218–223.CrossRef
Brayshaw, A. C., L. E. Frostick & I. Reid, 1983. The hydrodynamics of particle clusters and sediment entrainment in coarse alluvial channels. Sedimentology 30: 137–143.CrossRef
Brierley, G. J. & K. A. Fryirs, 2005. Geomorphology and River Management. Applications of the River Styles Framework. Blackwell Publications, Oxford: 398 pp.
Brown, A. G., 1997. Biogeography and diversity in multiple-channel river systems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 6: 179–185.CrossRef
Brown, A. V. & P. P. Brussock, 1991. Comparisons of benthic invertebrates between riffles and pool. Hydrobiologia 220: 99–108.CrossRef
Clarke, K. R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143.CrossRef
Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 1994. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. UK NERC and Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.
Council Directive 2000/60/EC, 2000. Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327/1: 1–72.
Crowder, D. W. & P. Diplas, 2000. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance. Journal of Hydrology 230: 171–191.CrossRef
Enders, E. C., D. Boisclair & A. G. Roy, 2003. The effect of turbulence on the cost of swimming for juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 1149–1160.CrossRef
Enders, E. C., D. Boisclair & A. G. Roy, 2005. A model of total swimming costs in turbulent flow for juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 1079–1089.CrossRef
Environment Agency, 1997. River Habitat Survey, 1997 Fieldsurvey Guidance Manual. Environment Agency, England and Wales, UK.
Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214.CrossRef
Garcia, X. F., I. Schnauder & M. T. Pusch, 2012. Complex hydromorphology of meanders can support benthic invertebrate diversity in rivers. Hydrobiologia 685: 49–68.CrossRef
Gordon, N. D., T. A. McMahon, B. L. Finlayson, C. J. Gippel & R. J. Nathan, 2008. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.
Gregory, K. J., R. J. Davis & P. W. Downs, 1992. Identification of river channel change due to urbanization. Applied Geography 12: 299–318.CrossRef
Growns, I. O. & J. Davis, 1994. Longitudinal processes in near-bed flows and macroinvertebrate communities in a western Australian stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 417–438.CrossRef
Harper, D. J., S. Mekotova, J. Hume, J. White & J. Hall, 1997. Habitat heterogeneity and aquatic invertebrate diversity in floodplain forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 6: 275–285.CrossRef
Harper, D. M., C. D. Smith, J. L. Kemp & G. A. Crosa, 1998. The use of “functional habitat” in the conservation, management and rehabilitation of rivers. In Bretschko, G. & J. Helesic (eds), Advances in River Bottom Ecology. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 315–326.
Harrison, L. R., C. J. Legleiter, M. A. Wydzga & T. Dunne, 2011. Channel dynamics and habitat development in a meandering gravel bed river. Water Resources Research 47(1): 21.
Harvey, G. L. & N. J. Clifford, 2009. Microscale hydrodynamics and coherent flow structures in rivers: implications for the characterization of physical habitat. River Research and Applications 25: 160–180.CrossRef
Harvey, G. L. & N. J. Clifford, 2010. Experimental field assessment of suspended sediment parthways for characterizing hydraulic habitat. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 35: 600–610.
James, A. B. & I. M. Henderson, 2005. Comparison of coarse particulate organic matter retention in meandering and straightened sections of a third-order New Zealand stream. River Research and Applications 21: 641–650.CrossRef
Jowett, I. G., 1993. A method for identifying pool, run, and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Resources 27: 241–248.CrossRef
Kaiser, M. J., S. I. Rogers & J. R. Ellis, 1999. Importance of benthic habitat complexity for demersal fish assemblages in fish habitat: essential fish habitat and rehabilitation. In Benaka, L. R. (ed.), American Fisheries Society, Symposium 22. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, USA: 212–223.
Keller, E. A. & W. M. Melhorn, 1978. Rhythmic spacing and origin of pools and riffles. Geological Society of America Bulletin 85: 723–730.CrossRef
Kemp, J. L., D. M. Harper & G. A. Crosa, 1999. Use of ‘functional habitats’ to link ecology with morphology and hydrology in river rehabilitation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 9: 159–178.CrossRef
Lancaster, J. & A. G. Hildrew, 1993. Flow refugia and the microdistribution of lotic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 173–184.CrossRef
Lamouroux, N., S. Doledec & S. Gayraud, 2004. Biological traits of stream macroinvertebrate communities: effects of microhabitat, reach, and basin filters. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 449–466.CrossRef
Linklater, W., 1995. Breakdown and detritivore colonisation of leaves in three New Zealand streams. Hydrobiologia 306: 241–250.CrossRef
Maddock, I., 1999. The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwater Biology 41: 373–391.CrossRef
McCabe, D. C. & N. J. Gotelli, 2000. Effects of disturbance frequency, intensity, and area on stream macroinvertebrate communities. Oecologia 124: 270–279.CrossRef
McNair, J. N., J. D. Newbold & D. D. Hart, 1997. Turbulent transport of suspended particles and dispersing benthic organisms: How long to hit bottom? Journal of Theoretical Biology 188: 29–52.CrossRef
Merigoux, S. & S. Doledec, 2004. Hydraulic requirements of stream communities: a case study on invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 49: 600–613.CrossRef
Minshall, G. W., R. C. Petersen, K. W. Cummins, T. L. Bott, J. R. Sedell, C. E. Cushing & R. L. Vannote, 1983. Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem dynamics. Ecological Monographs 53: 1–25.CrossRef
Montgomery, D. R. & J. M. Buffington, 1997. Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin 109: 596–611.CrossRef
Montgomery, D. R. & J. M. Buffington, 1998. Channel processes, classification and response. In Naiman, R. & R. Bilby (eds), River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. Springer-Verlag, New York: 13–42.
Newson, M. D., D. M. Harper, C. L. Padmore, J. L. Kemp & B. Vogel, 1998. A cost-effective approach for linking habitats, flow types and species requirements. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 431–466.CrossRef
Padmore, C. L., 1997. Biotopes and their hydraulics: a method for defining the physical component of freshwater quality. In Boon, P. J. & D. L. Howell (eds), Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable?. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh: 251–257.
Padmore, C. L., 1998. The role of physical biotopes in determining the conservation status and flow requirements of British rivers. Aquatic Ecosystem in Health Management 1: 25–35.
Palmer, M. A., H. L. Menninger & E. Bernhardt, 2010. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55: 205–222.CrossRef
Puckeridge, T. J., F. Sheldon, K. F. Walker & A. J. Boulton, 1998. Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers. Marine and Freshwater Research 49: 55–72.CrossRef
Raven, P. J., P. Fox, M. Everard, N. T. H. Holmes & F. H. Dawson, 1997. River Habitat Survey: a new system for classifying rivers according to their habitat quality. In Boon, P. J. & D. L. Howell (eds), Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable?. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh: 215–234.
Rempel, L. L., J. S. Richardson & M. C. Healy, 1999. Flow refugia for benthic macroinvertebrates during flooding of a large river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 34–38.CrossRef
Richards, K. S., 1976. The morphology of riffle-pool sequences. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 1: 71–88.
Robert, A., 2003. River Processes: An Introduction to Fluvial Dynamics. Arnold, London, UK.
Snaddon, C. D., B. A. Stewart & B. R. Davies, 1992. The effect of discharge on leaf retention in two headwater streams. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 125: 109–120.
Speaker, R., K. Moor & S. Gregory, 1984. Analysis of the process of retention of organic matter in stream ecosystems. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie 22: 1835–1841.
Stazner, B. & B. Higler, 1986. Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns. Freshwater Biology 16: 127–139.CrossRef
Sylvestre, S. & R. C. Bailey, 1998. Riffle and leaf pack communities from the Fraser River basin: are they redundant? Abstract of presentation at the North American Benthological Society Annual meeting, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, 1998. Available online: http://www.benthos.org/database/allnabstracts.cfm/db/Pei1998asbtracts/id/55 [Accessed 24/11/2011].
Thomson, J. R., M. P. Taylor & G. J. Brierley, 2004. Are River Styles ecologically meaningful? A test of the ecological significance of a geomorphic river characterization scheme. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 25–48.CrossRef
Thorp, J. H., 2009. Models of Ecological Processes in Riverine Ecosystems. Encyclopaedia of Inland Waters 1: 448–455.CrossRef
Townsend, C. R., M. R. Scarsbrook & S. Doledec, 1997. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis, refugia and biodiversity in streams. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 938–949.CrossRef
Vaughan, I. P., M. Diamond, A. M. Gurnell, K. A. Hall, A. Jenkins, N. J. Milner, L. A. Naylor, D. A. Sear, G. Woodward & S. J. Ormerod, 2009. Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19: 113–125.CrossRef
Wallace, J. B., T. F. Cuffney, J. R. Webster, G. J. Lugthart, K. Chung & B. S. Goldowitz, 1982. Five-year study of export fine organic particles from headwater stream: effects of season, extreme discharges, and invertebrate manipulation. Limnology and Oceanography 36: 670–682.CrossRef
Ward, J. V., 1989. The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8: 2–8.CrossRef
Ward, J. V. & K. Tockner, 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Ecology 46: 807–819.CrossRef
Ward, J. V., K. Tockner & F. Schiemer, 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 15: 125–139.CrossRef
Webster, J. R., A. P. Covich, J. L. Tank & T. V. Crockett, 1994. Retention of coarse organic particles in streams in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 140–150.CrossRef
Williams, A. E., K. Hendry, D. C. Bradley, R. Waterfall & D. Cragg-Hine, 2005. The importance of habitat heterogeneity to fish diversity and biomass. Journal of Fish Biology 67: 261–278.CrossRef
Winterbottom, J., S. Orton, A. Hildrew & J. Lancaster, 1997. Field experiments on flow refugia in streams. Freshwater Biology 37: 569–580.CrossRef
Witzigs Ltd, 2012. Witzigs Games. Available online: http://www.witzigs.co.uk/ [Accessed on 27/04/2012].
Wyrick, J. R. & P. C. Klingeman, 2011. Proposed fluvial island classification scheme and its use for river restoration. River Research and Applications 27: 814–825.
Zavadil, E. A., M. J. Stewardson, M. E. Turner & A. R. Ladson, 2012. An evaluation of surface flow types as a rapid measure of channel morphology for the geomorphic component of river condition assessments. Geomorphology 139(140): 303–312.CrossRef
- Characterization of hydraulic habitat and retention across different channel types; introducing a new field-based technique
Volume 694, Issue 1 , pp 219-233
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Hydraulic habitat
- Channel type
- Physical heterogeneity
- Industry Sectors