Opinion paper


, Volume 654, Issue 1, pp 1-5

First online:

The requirement for accurate diet-tissue discrimination factors for interpreting stable isotopes in sharks

Comment on: stable isotope dynamics in elasmobranch fishes
  • Nigel E. HusseyAffiliated withSchool of Ocean Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor UniversityGreat Lakes Institute of Environmental Research, University of Windsor Email author 
  • , M. Aaron MacNeilAffiliated withAustralian Institute of Marine Science
  • , Aaron T. FiskAffiliated withGreat Lakes Institute of Environmental Research, University of Windsor

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


Stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon (δ15N and δ13C) provide an important tool to examine diet, trophic position and movement/migration of both aquatic and terrestrial animals. Over the past 10 years, there have been repeated calls to tighten up basic assumptions when applying stable isotopes, one of the most important being the application of accurate, species-specific diet-tissue discrimination factors (DTDFs). Taxa- or species-specific DTDFs are required for (i) predicting dietary sources to a consumer using stable isotope mixing models and (ii) for estimating trophic position relative to primary consumers or known base species. Logan & Lutcavage (2010) recently presented data on stable isotope dynamics in elasmobranch fishes and concluded that DTDFs for teleost fish were suitable for elasmobranch fish, endorsing the generally applied value of 3.4‰. When considering (i) a recent study which found that DTDFs were lower for large sharks than teleost fish (Hussey et al., 2010) and (ii) that the Logan and Lutcavage study did not experimentally address the issue of DTDFs, we would argue that this conclusion is misleading. We demonstrate this point by estimating the proportion of prey items of a captive shark with a known diet history by modelling the δ15N values of the shark and its prey. The often repeated implication of inaccurate DTDFs is clear, with model results highly variable depending on the selected DTDF. In addition, model results for the standard teleost DTDF of 3.4‰ provided erroneous estimates of prey consumption. The suggestion that DTDFs for teleost fish are suitable for elasmobranchs may mislead investigators to choose DTDFs which are likely not applicable to their study species. Caution is therefore warranted in advocating this approach. Continued experimental work to examine stable isotopes in sharks is required and recommendations are made.


Stable isotopes Elasmobranch Shark Diet-tissue discrimination factor Fractionation Mixing model Trophic position