A Review of Methods for Measuring the Surface Area of Stream Substrates Article Received: 01 November 2004 Revised: 06 July 2005 Accepted: 26 July 2005 DOI:
Cite this article as: Bergey, E.A. & Getty, G.M. Hydrobiologia (2006) 556: 7. doi:10.1007/s10750-005-1042-3 Abstract
Surface area measurement is a common component of benthic research, especially in the quantification of chlorophyll. Multiple techniques are available and 10 are described: artificial substrates, area-specific sampling, geometric approximation, stone shape equations, foil wrapping, grids, stamps, wetted layer, particle layer, and planar area measurement. A literature search of 130 papers indicated the most common methods: using artificial substrates of known area, subsampling a specific area using a template or sampler, measuring stone dimensions and using an equation to derive area, and using the weight of foil wrapped on stones. Methods were compared using spheres of known area, smooth and rough granite stones, and plastic macrophytes. Most methods produced highly correlated measurements and accurately estimated surface area. The wetted layer method was sensitive to stone roughness and plant complexity, but may overestimate the area of complex surfaces. Replication of one method by 10 biologists indicated that individual differences in technique can affect surface area values. Factors to consider in choosing an appropriate method include ease of use, characteristics of the substrates (e.g., porosity and flexibility), fineness of scale in measuring area, and whether methods must be field-based or can include laboratory techniques.
Keywords artificial substrates planar area stone area algal sampling periphyton macrophytes substrata References Aloi, J. E. 1990 A critical review of recent freshwater periphyton field methods Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47 656 670 CrossRef Google Scholar Behmer, D. J., Hawkins, C. P. 1986 Effects of overhead canopy on macroinvertebrate production in a Utah stream Freshwater Biology 16 287 300 Google Scholar Bergey, E. A. 2005 How protective are refuges? Quantifying algal protection in rock crevices Freshwater Biology 50 1163 1177 CrossRef Google Scholar Biggs, B. J. F., Close, M. E. 1989 Periphyton biomass dynamics in gravel bed rivers: the relative effects of flows and nutrients Freshwater Biology 22 209 231 Google Scholar Calow, P. 1972 A method for determining the surface areas of stones to enable quantitative density estimates of littoral stonedwelling organisms to be made Hydrobiologia 40 37 50 CrossRef Google Scholar Carlsson, M., Nilsson, L. M., Svensson, B., Ulfstrand, S., Wotton, R. S. 1977 Lacustrine seston and other factors influencing the blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) inhabiting lake outlets in Swedish Lapland Oikos 29 229 238 Google Scholar Cattaneo, A., Carignan, R. 1983 A colorimetric method for measuring the surface area of aquatic plants Aquatic Botany 17 291 294 CrossRef Google Scholar Coler, M., Chang, Y. Y., Coler, R. A. 1989 The determination of limestone area by linear regression Hydrobiologia 184 165 168 CrossRef Google Scholar Dall, P. C. 1979 A sampling technique for littoral stone dwelling organisms Oikos 33 106 112 Google Scholar Doeg, T., Lake, P. S. 1981 A technique for assessing the composition and density of the macroinvertebrate fauna of large stones in streams Hydrobiologia 80 3 6 CrossRef Google Scholar Gíslason, G. M. 1985 The life cycle and production of Simulium vittatum Zett. In the River Laxá, North-East Iceland Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 22 3281 3287 Google Scholar Graham, A. A., McCaughan, D. J., McKee, F. S. 1988 Measurement of surface area of stones Hydrobiologia 157 85 87 CrossRef Google Scholar Gregg, W. W., Rose, F. L. 1982 The effects of aquatic macrophytes on the steam microenvironment Aquatic Botany 14 309 324 CrossRef Google Scholar Harrod, J. J., Hall, R. E. 1962 A method for determining the surface areas of various aquatic plants Hydrobiologia 20 173 178 CrossRef Google Scholar Kovalak, W. P. 1978 Diel changes in stream benthos density on stones and artificial substrates Hydrobiologia 58 7 16 CrossRef Google Scholar Ledger, M. E., Hildrew, A. G. 1998 Temporal and spatial variation in the epilithic biofilm of an acid stream Freshwater Biology 40 655 670 CrossRef Google Scholar McCreadie, J. W., Colbo, M. H. 1991 A critical examination of four methods of estimating the surface area of stone substrate from streams in relation to sampling Simuliidae (Diptera) Hydrobiologia 220 205 210 Google Scholar Minshall, G. W., Minshall, J. N. 1977 Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a Rocky Mountain (U.S.A.) stream Hydrobiologia 55 231 249 CrossRef Google Scholar Morales-Alamo, R. 1993 Estimation of oyster shell surface area using regression equations derived from aluminum foil molds Journal of Shellfish Research 12 15 19 Google Scholar Morin, A. 1987 Unsuitability of introduced tiles for sampling blackfly larvae (Diptera: Simuliidae) Freshwater Biology 17 143 150 Google Scholar Rosine, W. N. 1955 The distribution of invertebrates on submerged aquatic plant surfaces in Muskee Lake, Colorado Ecology 36 308 314 Google Scholar Shelly, T. E. 1979 The effect of rock size upon the distribution of species of Orthocladiinae (Chironomidae: Diptera) and Baetis intercalaris McDunnough (Baetidae: Ephemeroptera) Ecological Entomology 4 95 100 CrossRef Google Scholar Steinman, A. D., Lamberti, G. A. 1996 Biomass and pigments of benthic algae Hauer, F. R. Lamberti, G. A. eds. Methods in Stream Ecology Academic Press San Diego 295 313 Google Scholar Thompson, F. B., Leyton, L. 1971 Method for measuring the leaf surface area of complex shoots Nature 229 572 PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Uehlinger, U. 1991 Spatial and temporal variability of the periphyton biomass in a prealpine river (Necker, Switzerland) Archiv für Hydrobiologie 123 219 237 Google Scholar