Human Studies

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 95–113

Dreyfus and Haugeland on Heidegger and Authenticity

Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10746-012-9212-6

Cite this article as:
Henschen, T. Hum Stud (2012) 35: 95. doi:10.1007/s10746-012-9212-6


This paper tries to read some structure into the perplexing diversity of the literature on Heidegger’s concept of authenticity. It argues that many of the interpretations available rely on views that are false and cannot be Heidegger’s. It also shows that the only correct interpretation of Heidegger’s concept of authenticity emerges from a synthesis of Dreyfus’ later interpretation and Haugeland’s interpretation of this concept. A synthesis of these interpretations yields an interpretation, according to which Dasein’s being is authentic only if it is capable of using tools or language in radically new ways.


HeideggerAuthenticityDreyfusHaugelandWorld transformationOntological heritage

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität Heidelberg, Philosophisches SeminarHeidelbergGermany