Bauman, Z. (1976). Towards a critical sociology: An essay on commonsense and emancipation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bernstein, R. (1985). Introduction. In R. Bernstein (Ed.), Habermas and modernity (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). London: RKP.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum,
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Science of science and reflexivity. London: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Participant objectivation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute,
Collins, H. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
de Grazia, A. (1963). The scientific reception system and Dr. Velikovsky. American Behavioral Scientist,
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Habermas, J. (1983). Interpretive social science vs. hermeneuticism. In N. Haan (Ed.), Social science as moral inquiry (pp. 251–270). New York: Columbia University Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. I). Boston, MA: Beacon.
Habermas, J. (1985). Questions and counterquestions. In R. Berstein (Ed.), Habermas and modernity (pp. 192–216). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Habermas, J. (1990). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Coping with contingencies. In J. Niznik & J. T. Sanders (Eds.), Debating the state of philosophy: Habermas, Rorty, Kolakowski (pp. 1–30). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2000). Richard Rorty’s pragmatic turn. In R. Brandom (Ed.), Rorty and his critics (pp. 31–55). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hammersely, M. (1992). What’s wrong with ethnography? London: RKP.
Hollis, M. (1982). The social destruction of reality. In M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism (pp. 67–86). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hoy, D. C. (1994). Critical theory and critical history. In D. C. Hoy & T. McCarthy (Eds.), Critical theory (pp. 101–214). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Kim, K.-M. (2005). Discourses on liberation : An anatomy of critical theory. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Kim, K.-M. (2009). What would a Bourdieuan sociology of scientific truth look like? Social Science Information,
Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, T. (1985). Reflections on rationalization in the theory of communicative action. In R. Bernstein (Ed.), Habermas and modernity (176–191). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
McCarthy, T. (1988). Scientific rationality and the ‘strong programme in the sociology of knowledge. In E. McMullin (Ed.), Construction and constraint: The shaping of scientific rationality (pp. 75–96). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
McCarthy, T. (1994). Philosophy and critical theory: A reprise. In D. C. Hoy & T. McCarthy (Eds.), Critical theory (pp. 1–100). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mulkay, M. (1976). Norms and ideology in science. Social Science Information,
Mulkay, M. (1980). Sociology of science in the west. Current Sociology,
Newton-Smith, W. (1981). The rationality of science
. London: Routledge and Keagn Paul.CrossRef
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company Inc.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The growth of science in society. Minerva,
Rorty, R. (2000). Universality and truth. In R. Brandom (Ed.), Rorty and his critics (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Blackwell.
Winch, P. (1958). The idea of social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.