Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Whose Authority? Temminck’s Debates on Zoological Classification and Nomenclature: 1820–1850

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By following the arguments between Coenraad J. Temminck and fellow ornithologists Louis J.-P. Vieillot and Nicholas Vigors, this paper sketches, to a degree, the state of zoological classification and nomenclature between 1825 and 1840 in Europe. The discussions revolved around the problems caused by an unstable nomenclature, the different definitions of genera and species and the best method to achieve a natural system of classification. As more and more naturalists concerned with classifying and arranging the groups of birds joined these discussions, a broad platform for debate emerged around the 1840s that gave a major impulse to the disciplines of taxonomy and systematics. Natural history ceased to be dominated by a few influential scientific authorities and became the scientific field where debate preceded agreement and, with it, progress. With this ‘democratization’ of natural history, Temminck’s status significantly changed between 1815 and 1840. After that year, his own views on classification along with certain economical and political developments in The Netherlands led Temminck to abandon the arena of ornithology and therefore, to lose his scientific authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. 1820. “Nouveau Recueil de Planches Coloriéés d’Oiseaux pour servir de complement aux Planches Enluminés de Buffon. Par MM. C.J. Temminck, d’Amsterdam, et Meiffren Laugier, baron de Chartrouse, de Paris.” Annales Générales des Sciences Physiques 7: 361–371.

  • Anonymous. 1821. “Nouveau Recueil de Planches Coloriéés d’Oiseaux. Par MM. Temminck et Meiffren Laugier.” Annales Générales des Sciences Physiques 8: 395–396.

  • Anonymous, 1826. “Analytical Notices of Books. Monographies de Mammalogie, ou descriptions de quelques genres de Mammifères dont les Espèces ont été observées dans les différens Musées de l’Europe. Par C.J. Temminck, livraison, 4eme.” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2: 526–534.

  • Anonymous 1840. “Bibliographical Notices. Nouveau Recueil de Planches Coloriées d’Oiseaux… par M. Temminck et Meiffren Laugier Baron de Chartrouse, Livr. 98–102, 1839.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4: 266–268

  • Appel, T.A. 1987. The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate. French Biology in the Decades Before Darwin. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicheno, J.E. 1826. “On Systems and Methods in Natural History.” Transactions of the Linnean Society 15: 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. 1964. Georges Cuvier: Zoologist. A Study in the History of Evolution Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuvier, F. 1832. “Nouveau Recueil de planches coloriées d’oiseaux… par M. Temminck, conservateur du cabinet d’histoire naturelle de Leyde, er M. Meiffren Laugier, baron de Chartrouse.” Journal des Savants, 2 Sér, n. 17: 642–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Fontaine, J. 1668. Fables. Book IV. Paris: Barbin.

  • Drapiez, P.A.J. 1820. “Manuel d’ornithologie, ou tableau systématique des oiseaux qui se trouvent en Europe, par C.J. Temminck, 2me édition (1).” Annales Générales des Sciences Physiques 6: 276–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, P.L. 1976. “The Type-Concept in Zoology During the First Half of the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 9(1): 93–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, P.L. 1982. The Emergency of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760–1850. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farbicius, J.C. 1778. Philosophia entomologica sistens scientiae fundamenta adiectis definitionibus exemplis, observationibus, adumbrationibus. Bohnii, Hamburgi et Kilonii: E. Carol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassó Miracle, M.E. 2008. “The Significance of Temminck’s Work on Biogeography: Early Nineteenth Century Natural History in Leiden, The Netherlands.” Journal of the History of Biology 41: 677–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gijzen, A. 1938. ‘s Rijks Museum van Natuurlijke Historie, 1820–1915. Amsterdam: W.L. en J. Brussen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, G.R. 1840. A List of the Genera of Birds with an Indication of the Typical Species of Each Genus. London: Richard and John E. Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, G.R. 1842. Appendix to a List of the Genera of Birds. London: Richard and John E. Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, G.R. 1844–1849. The Genera of Birds Comprising Their Generic Characters, A Notice of the Habits of Each Genus, and an Extensive List of Species Referred to Their Several Genera. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.

  • Holthuis, L.B. 1993. The Three Dutch Authors of Von Siebold’s Fauna Japonica. In Von Siebold and Natural History of Japan, Crustacea. Tokyo: The Carcinological Society of Japan, pp. 689–708.

  • Holthuis, L.B. 1995. 1820–1958: Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie. Leiden: Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsfield, T. 1826. “Description on the Helarctos euryspilus; Exhibiting in the Bear from the Island of Borneo, by the Type of a Subgenus of Ursus.” Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society 2: 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illiger, J.K.W. 1811. Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium additis terminis zoographicis triusque classis, eorumque versione germanica. Berlin: C. Salfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, S., Lamas, G., Lughadha, N.E., and Novarino, G. 2004. “Stability or Stasis in the Names of Organisms: The Evolving Codes of Nomenclature.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2004 359: 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Vergata, A. 1987. Au nom de l’espèce. Classification et nomenclature au XIXe siègle. Scott Atran et al. (eds.), Histoire du concept d’espèce dans les sciences de la vie. Paris: Fondation Singer-Polignac.

  • Limoges, C. 1980. “The Development of the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle of Paris 1800–1914.” R. Fox and G. Weisz (eds.), The Origin of Science and Technology in France, 1808–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. 1735. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Lugdunum Batavorum: Theodorum Haak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. 1751. Philosophia Botanica in qua explicantur fundamenta botanica cum definitionibus partium, exemplis terminorum, observationibus rariorum, adjectis figuris æneis. Stockolmiæ: G. Kiesewetter, Amsterlodami: Z. Chatelain.

  • Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum, exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas. Stockholm: Holmiae.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeay, W.S. 1819. Horae Entomologica, or Essays on the Annulose Animals. London: Bagster.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeay, W.S. 1829. “A Letter to J.E. Bicheno, Esq., F.R.S., in Examination of His Paper on Systems and Methods.” Linnean Transactions in Philosophical Magazine Series, 2 6(33): 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • McOuat, G. 1996. “Species, Rules and Meaning: The Politics of Language and the Ends of Definitions in 19th Century Natural History.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 27(4): 473–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McOuat, G. 2001. “Cataloguing Power: Delineating ‘Competent Naturalists’ and the meaning of Species in the British Museum.” British Journal for the History of Science 34: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, R.V. 1995. Towards Stability in the Names of Animals. A History of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1895–1995. London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesher, P.H. 1948. “Louis Jean Pierre Vieillot (1748–1831).” The Auk 65: 568–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, H. (ed.). 1883. Vieillot’s Analyse d’une Nouvelle Ornithologie Elementaire. London: The Willughby Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamos, D.N. 2005. “Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy and Essentialism – A Reply to Mary Winsor.” Biology and Philosophy 20: 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann, E. 1975. Ornithology from Aristotle to the present. Ed. G.W. Cottrell. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. English translation by Epstein of Stresseman’s Die Entwicklung der Ornithologie von Aristoteles bis zur Gegenwart (1951).

  • Strickland, H.E. 1837. “Rules for Zoological Nomenclature.” The Magazine of Natural History 1: 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, H.E. 1840. “Observations Upon the Affinities and Analogies of Organized Beings.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4: 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, H.E. 1841. “On the True Method of Discovering the Natural System in Zoology and Botany.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6: 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, H.E., et al. 1842. Report of a Committee Appointed “To Consider the Rules by Which the Nomenclature of Zoology may be Established on a Uniform and Permanent Basis”. London: John Murray for the British Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swainson, W. 1834. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural History. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swainson, W. 1835. A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman, and John Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swainson, W. 1836. On the Natural History and Classification of Birds. Lardner’s Cabinet Cyclopedia. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swainson, W. 1841. “On the True Method of Discovering the Natural System in Zoology and Botany.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6: 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temminck, C.J. 1813–1815. Histoire Naturelle générale des pigeons et des gallinacés. Amsterdam: J.C. Sepp et fils.

  • Temminck, C.J. 1815. Manuel d’ornithologie, ou tableau systématique des oiseaux qui se trouvent en Europe. Amsterdam: J.C. Sepp et fils.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temminck, C.J. 1817. Observations sur la classification méthodique des oiseaux et remarques sur l’analyse d’une nouvelle ornithologie elémentaire par L.P. Vieillot. Amsterdam: Gabriel Doufour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temminck, C.J. 1820–1840. Manuel d’ornithologie, ou tableau systématique des oiseaux qui se trouvent en Europe: précédé d’une analyse du système général d’ornithologie, et suivi d’une table alphabétique des espèces. 2e éd., considérablement augmentée et mise au niveau des décourvertes nouvelles. Paris: Gabriel Dufour.

  • Temminck, C.J. 1832. “Monographie over een nieuw geslacht van Knaagdier, onder den naam van Nyctocleptes.” Hall, Bijdragen 7: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temminck, C.J. 1827–1842. Monographies de mammalogie, ou Description de quelques genres de mammifères, dont les espèces ont été observée dans les differens muséés de l’Europa. Paris: Dufour & d’Ocagne.

  • Temminck, C.J. 1846–1849. Coup-d’oeil général sur les possessions néerlandaises dans l’Inde Archipélagique. 3 Vols. Leiden: Arnz.

  • Theunissen, B. 2000. ‘Nut en nog eens nut’: wetenschapsbeelden van Nederlandse natuuronderzoekers, 1800–1900. Hilversum: Verloren.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel, K., van Helden, A. and Palm, L. (eds.). 1999. A History of Science in the Netherlands. Survey, Themes and Reference. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veth, H.J. 1879. Overzicht van hetgeen, in het bijzonder door Nederland, gedaan is voor de kennis der fauna van Nederlandsch Indië. Leiden: Van Doesburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieillot, L.P. 1816. Analyse d’une nouvelle ornithologie élémentaire. Paris: Deterville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieillot, L.P. 1818. “Ornithologie.” In: Nouveau dictionnaire d’histoire naturelle, appliquée aux arts, à l’agriculture, à l’économie rurale et domestique, à la médecine, etc. Par une société de naturalistes et d’agriculteurs (1816–1819). Vol. 24. Paris: Deterville, pp. 68–144.

  • Vigors, N.A. 1824. “Some Observations on the Nomenclature of Ornithology; Particularly with Reference to the Admission of New Genera.” The Zoological Journal 1(2): 180–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigors, N.A. 1825. “Observations on the Natural Affinities that Connect the Orders and Families of Birds.” Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 14: 395–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A.R. 1856. “Attempts at a Natural Classification of Birds.” The Annals and Magazine of Natural History 18: 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildenow, C.L. 1792. Grundriss der Kräuterkunde zu Vorlesungen. zu Vorlesungen entworfen. Berlin: Haude und Spener.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands

    M. Eulàlia Gassó Miracle

Authors
  1. M. Eulàlia Gassó Miracle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Eulàlia Gassó Miracle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eulàlia Gassó Miracle, M. On Whose Authority? Temminck’s Debates on Zoological Classification and Nomenclature: 1820–1850. J Hist Biol 44, 445–481 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9265-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9265-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation