Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Students’ choice of sub-degree programmes in self-financing higher education institutions in Hong Kong

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The higher education sector in Hong Kong has restructured substantially from elite to mass higher education since the introduction of education reform by the Hong Kong government in 2000. To stay ahead in this competitive environment in the education sector, management teams of self-financing institutions have to compete for students and identify key factors influencing students’ choice of post-secondary programmes. This paper investigates factors affecting students’ choice of sub-degree programmes in self-financing higher education institutions in Hong Kong. Importance–performance analysis was employed as an analytical tool to help institutions identify areas for improvement and utilize their resources more effectively. The findings show that institutions should find ways to improve areas of “articulation”, “career services”, “financial aid” and “programme design” in order to increase their competitiveness. The outcomes of this research will help management teams of self-financing higher education institutions enhance their overall strategic plan and enrolment processes in order to attract students in a context of increasing competition for students in the Hong Kong higher education system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1 = Not important at all; 2 = Not very important; 3 = Somewhat unimportant; 4 = Neutral; 5 = Somewhat important; 6 = Important; 7 = Very important.

  2. 1 = Not satisfied at all; 2 = Not very satisfied; 3 = Somewhat dissatisfied; 4 = Neutral; 5 = Somewhat satisfied; 6 = Satisfied; 7 = Very satisfied.

References

  • Ancheh, K. S. B. (2006). Institutional factors attracting students to Malaysian institution of higher education. International Review of Business Research papers, 2(1), 46–64.

  • Bejou, D. (2005). Treating students like customers. BizEd, pp. 44–47. http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/archives/MarApr05/p44-47.pdf. Accessed 2 Sep 2005.

  • Bontrager, B. (2004). Strategic enrollment management: Core strategies and best practices. College and University Journal, 79(4), 9–15.

  • Brigham, D. E. (2001). Regents college: Converting student support services to online delivery. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, Education. (2008). Education statistics. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., & Yeo, C. M. A. (2009). My place or yours? Perceptions of, and selection choice criteria for, higher education institutions: The case of UK and Malaysian students. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 1(2), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, R. K. S., & Choi, T. (2000). An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: A comparison of business and leisure travellers. Tourism Management, 21, 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox III, E. P. (1980). The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 407–422.

  • Curs, B. R. (2008). The effects of institutional merit-based aid on the enrollment decisions of needy students. Enrollment Management Journal (Summer) 10–31.

  • Dennis, M. J. (1998). A practical guide to enrollment and retention management in higher education. Westport CT: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49, 495–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolence, M. G. (1997). Strategic enrollment management: A primer for campus administrators. Washington DC: American Association of Collegiate Registrar’s and Admission Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J., Douglas, A., & Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(3), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelland, B. T., Workman, L., & Sigh, M. (2000). Ensuring service quality for campus career services centers: A modified SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(3), 236–245.

  • Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision and dissonance. Standford: Standford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foddy, W. (1994). Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge: Camgridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, M. A., Garvey, D. E., & Sugerman, D. A. (2003). The long-term effects of a first-year student wilderness orientation program. The Journal of Experimental Education, 26(1), 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. S., Mazwell, W., Rodriguez, P., Hocevar, D., & Fillpot, J. (2000). Peer and student-faculty relations in community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24(7), 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinzen, C., & Rakes, T. D. (1995). Enrollment management and career services: Translating concepts into practice. Journal of Career Development, 22(2), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, L. (2006). More degree places to be available in shake-up. South China Morning Post, p. C2.

  • Hooley, G. J., & Lynch, J. E. (1981). Modelling the student university choice process through the use of conjoint measurement techniques. European Research, 9(4), 158–170.

  • Hossler, D. (2000). The role of financial aid in enrollment management. New Directions for Student Services, 89, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., & Bean, J. P. (1990). The strategic management of college enrollments. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, T. (2000). Enrollment management. New Directions for Higher Education, 111, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, T. J., & Rumbough, L. P. (1997). Evaluating the enrollment management organization. College and University Journal, 72(4), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (2010). Opening up the road to nowhere: Problems with the path to mass higher education in Hong Kong. Higher Education, 59(2), 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Rhoades, G., & Woodard, J. D. B. (2003). Sponsored research versus graduating students? Intervening variables and unanticipated findings in public research universities. Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 51–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (1993). Academic advising, retention and transfer. New Directions for Community Colleges, 82, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Fox, K. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampf, R. F., & Heinlein, A. C. (1981). Developing marketing strategies and tactics in higher education through target market research. Decision Sciences, 12(2), 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremerer, F. R., Baldrige, J. V., & Green, K. C. (1982). Strategies for effective enrollment management. Washington, DC: American Association of Registrars and Admissions Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusumawati, A. (2013). A qualitative study of the factors influencing student choice: The case of public university in Indonesia. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(1), 314–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L. K. (2003). Institutional factors affecting student retention. Journal of Education, 124(1), 126–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. (1997). What are student education and educational related needs? Marketing and Research Today, 25(3), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobasso, T. (2005). An evaluation of enrollment management models of the 28 Florida community colleges. Orlando: University of Central Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S. E. (2014). Active learning: An advantageous yet challenging approach to accounting ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1–10.

  • Maringe, F. (2006). University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 466–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T., Kemp, S., & Savery, L. (1997). International students who choose not to study in Australia: An examination of Taiwan and Indonesia. Canberra: Australian International Education Foundation.

  • McIntyre, C. (2011). Blending quantitative and qualitative research for college planning. Research in Higher Education Journal, 14, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburger, J. (1999). Executive board position paper research and recommendations for developmental education and/or learning assistance programs in the state of New York. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 16(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. A., & Palmer, A. (2004). Importance-performance analysis: A useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacio, A. B., Meneses, G. D., & Pérez, P. J. (2002). The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 486–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirius, L. K. (2014). A data-drive approach to SEM development at a two-year college. Strategic Enrollment Management Quarterly, 1(4), 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, J. H. (2003). Interrelationship of student academic services. In K. G. L. (Ed.), Student academic services: An integrated approach (pp. 53–69). New York: Jossey-Bass.

  • Singell, L. D. (2004). Come and stay a while: Does financial aid effect retention conditioned on enrollment at a large public university? Economics of Education Review, 23(5), 459–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soutar, G., & Turner, J. (2002). “Students’ preferences for university: A conjoint analysis. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(1), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (1998). Report for july 1995 to june 1998. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, C. (2011). Reforming higher education in Hong Kong towards post-massification: The first decade and challenges ahead. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(2), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavas, U., & Shemwell, D. J. (2001). Modified importance-performance analysis: An application to hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 14(3), 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young-Jones, A. D., Burt, T. D., Dixon, S., & Hawthorne, M. J. (2013). Academic advising: Does it really impact student success? Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung, M. S. (2002). Community college: A new born baby of the Hong Kong education system for the New Millennium. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 1, 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. Q., & Chow, I. (2004). Application of importance-performance model in tour guides’ performance: Evidence from mainland Chinese outbound visitors in Hong Kong. Tourism Management, 25(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr. Ken Leung for his statistical assistance. This work was supported by the Federation for Self-financing Tertiary Education (FSTE), Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Professional Education and Executive Development, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, PolyU West Kowloon Campus, 12/F, South Tower, 9 Hoi Ting Road, Yau Ma Tei, Hong Kong

    Phoebe Wong, Peggy M. L. Ng, Connie K. Y. Mak & Jason K. Y. Chan

Authors
  1. Phoebe Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peggy M. L. Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Connie K. Y. Mak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jason K. Y. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phoebe Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, P., Ng, P.M.L., Mak, C.K.Y. et al. Students’ choice of sub-degree programmes in self-financing higher education institutions in Hong Kong. High Educ 71, 455–472 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9915-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9915-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation