Abstract
The purpose of this article is to study how students allocate time to different university and extra-university activities and to identify factors that might explain variability both between and within fields of study. At the heart of this exercise is the question of the time students dedicate to academic activities in competition with a whole range of other activities. In the literature, multiple candidate explanations are available that arise from models from essentially different conceptual origin. In particular, economic, sociological, and phenomenologically inspired models could provide valuable insight into the question. After a critical examination of these models on their potential for explaining time allocation, a study is reported involving a survey in higher education institutions in France. Data were analyzed using a hierarchical linear modeling approach. Results show that time allocation seems to be rooted in students’ past and current experience more than in their anticipations of the future. Implications for the value of the models in relation to the study of time allocation are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J. (1973). Higher education as a filter. Journal of Public Economics, 2, 193–216.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research/Columbia University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.
Bergson, H. (2007, [1888]). Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. Paris: PUF.
Boudon, R. (1973). L’inégalité des chances, la mobilité sociale dans les sociétés industrielles. Paris: Armand Colin.
Boudon, R. (1989). Effets pervers et ordre social. Paris: PUF.
Boudon, R. (1999a). Le sens des valeurs. Paris: PUF.
Boudon, R. (1999b). Les causes de l’inégalité des chances scolaires. In R. Boudon, N. Bulle, & M. Cherkaoui (Eds.), Ecole et société. Les paradoxes de la démocratie (pp. 151–170). Paris: PUF.
Boudon, R. (2002). Utilité ou rationalité? Rationalité restreinte ou générale? Revue d’Economie Politique, 112, 754–772.
Boudon, R. (2008). Essais sur la théorie générale de la rationalité. Paris: PUF.
Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique. Genève: Droz.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). Les trois états du capital culturel. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 30, 3–6.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). La noblesse d’Etat. Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 75–85.
Bulle, N. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu. L’Année sociologique, 52, 231–237.
Bulle, N. (2005). L’explication de l’action sociale. L’Année sociologique, 55, 9–18.
DesJardins, S., & Toutkoushian, R. (2005). Are students really rational? The development of rational thought and its application to student choice. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XX, pp. 191–240). Great Britain: Springer.
Dolton, P., Marcenaro, O. D., & Navarro, L. (2003). The effective use of Student time: A stochastic frontier production function case study. Economics of Education Review, 22, 547–560.
Faugère, J. P. (1980). L’allocation du temps entre travail domestique et travail marchand : discussion autour d’un modèle. Revue économique, 31, 313–346.
Fernex, A., & Compeyron, A. (2007). De la conversion des capitaux dans la théorie de Bourdieu. In J. Baillé (Ed.), Du mot au concept: Conversion. Grenoble: PUG.
Gamel, C. (2000). Et si l’université n’était qu’un « filtre » ? Actualité du modèle de Arrow. Economie publique, 6(2), 41–69.
Hadji, C., Bargel, T., & Masjuan, J. (Eds.). (2005). Etudier dans une université qui change. Grenoble: PUG.
Héran, F. (1987). La seconde nature de l’habitus. Revue française de sociologie, XXVIII, 385–416.
Husserl, E. (2007, [1938]). Leçons pour une phénoménologie de la conscience intime du temps. Paris: PUF.
INSEE. (2003). Nomenclature des professions et catégories socioprofessionnelles. http://www.insee.fr/fr/methodes/nomenclatures/pcsese/pcsese2003/doc/Guide_PCS-2003.pdf.
Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (1991). The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 471–522.
Lahire, B. (1999, Dir.) Le travail sociologique de P. Bourdieu. Paris: La Découverte.
Le Chapelain, C. (2008). Pour un accès équitable à l’enseignement supérieur: Analyse d’une politique éducative d’incitation ciblée. Politiques et gestion de l’enseignement supérieur, 1(20), 9–24.
Levin, H. M. (1984). About time for educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6, 151–163.
Levin, H. M., & Tsang, M. C. (1987). The economics of student time. Economics of Education Review, 6, 357–364.
Lévy-Garboua, L. (1976). Les demandes de l’étudiant ou les contradictions de l’université de masse. Revue française de sociologie, 17, 53–80.
Murat, F. (2009). Le retard scolaire en fonction du milieu parental: l’influence des compétences des parents. Economie et statistique, 424–425, 103–124.
Nash, R. (1999). Bourdieu, “Habitus”, and Educational Research: Is it all worth the candle? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 175–187.
Pishghadam, R., & Zabihi, R. (2011). Parental education and social and cultural capital in academic achievement. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 50–57.
Schmidt, R. M. (1983). Who maximizes what? A study in student time allocation. American Economic Review, 73(2), 23–28.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 1, 1–17.
Schütz, A. (1951). Choosing among projects of action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 12, 161–184.
Schütz, A. (1959). Tiresias or our knowledge of future events. Social Research, 26, 71–89.
Schütz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations: Selected writings. Edited by Helmut R. Wagner. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Schütz, A. (1998). Eléments de sociologie phénoménologique. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Schütz, A. (2008 [1971]). Le chercheur et le quotidien. Paris: Klincksieck.
Schütz, A. (2009 [1962]). Contribution à la sociologie de l’action. Paris: Hermann Editeurs.
Stevens, P., & Weale, M. (2004). Lazy students? A study of students time use. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 28 pages.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.
Tinto, V., & Cullen, J. (1973). Dropout in higher education: A review and theoretical synthesis of recent research. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Budgeting and Evaluation Report, U.S. Office of Education.
Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Sullivan, A., & Cheung, S. Y. (2003). Social class, ability and choice of subject in secondary and tertiary education in Britain. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 41–62.
Wingfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernex, A., Lima, L. & de Vries, E. Exploring time allocation for academic activities by university students in France. High Educ 69, 399–420 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9782-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9782-5