Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Including young people with disabilities: Assessment challenges in higher education

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within a European context, facilitating the increased participation of marginalized groups within society has become a cornerstone of social policy. In higher education in Ireland this has generally involved the targeting for support of individuals representing groups traditionally excluded on the grounds of socio-economic status. More recently, people with disability have been included in this consideration. This approach has tended to focus on physical access issues and some technical supports. However, access is multi-faceted and must include a review of pedagogic practices, assistive provision (technological and personal), student’s engagement with their workload (e.g. recording) and evaluation procedures: achieving accreditation levels commensurate with ability.

This small-scale Irish study examined the experiences of two groups of young people with physical disabilities and with dyslexia in two higher education institutions. It was apparent that for students with physical disabilities and with dyslexia, assessment practices were fraught with additional limitations. Assessment practices were mediated for these students through the physical environment, the backwash effect of assessment on curriculum, the availability and use of assistive technology, and through the attitudes of staff and students. It can be concluded that access issues within higher education have been inadequately conceptualized and as a result failed to address fundamental issues around assessment for students with physical disabilities and with dyslexia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AHEAD (1994). Students with disabilities in higher education: Survey on provision for students with disabilities in higher education for the academic year 1993/4. Dublin: Ahead

    Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Reform Group (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: Assessment Reform Group, University of Cambridge School of Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., & Lee, J. J. (2003). How risky are one-shot cross-sectional assessments of undergraduate students? Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 657–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaman, R. (1998). The unquiet ... even loud, andragogy! Alternative assessments for adult learners. Innovative Higher Education, 23(1), 47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, H. B. (2001). Establishing an early warning system: predicting low grades in college students from survey of academic orientations scores. Research in Higher Education, 42(6), 709–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birenbaum, M. (1997). Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. Higher Education, 33(1), 71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Williams, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment, Phi Delta Kappan online. http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kbla9810.htm.

  • Borland, J., & James, S. (1999). The learning experience of students with disabilities in higher education. A case study of a UK university. Disability and Society, 14(10), 85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education. (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H. (1995). Fractured identities. Cambridge: Polity

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H. (1997). Social divisions. In C. Ballard, et al. (Eds.), The student’s companion to sociology (pp. 142–151). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Bridgeman, B. (1998). Potential impact of the addition of a writing assessment on admissions decisions. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 663–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. F. (2001). Developing performance indicators for assessing classroom teaching practices and student learning. Research in Higher Education, 42(3), 327–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chard, G., & Couch, R. (1998). Access to higher education for the disabled student: A building survey at the University of Liverpool. Disability and Society, 13(4), 603–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins B. (2000). Perceiving success? An investigation into disabled students’ and academic staffs’ perceptions of the factors that inhibit disabled student’s occupational performance in Trinity College Dublin. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Dublin.

  • Cottrel, S. A., & Jones, E. A. (2003). Researching the scholarship of teaching and learning: an analysis of current curriculum practices. Innovative Higher Education, 27(3), 169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education & Science (2001). Report of the action group on access to higher education. Dublin: Stationery Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. (1992). Objectivity in educational research. Curriculm Inquiry, 22(1), 9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of minds: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row; (1993) London: Fontana Press.

  • Gardner, H. (1991). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In Gifford B. R., & O’Connor M. C. (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. (pp. 77–120). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, H., & Peterson, M. W. (2003). Factors that promote faculty involvement in and satisfaction with institutional and classroom student assessment. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 173–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ireland (1998). Education Act Dublin: Stationery Office.

  • Hanafin, J., Shevlin, M., & Flynn, M. (2002). Responding to student diversity: Lessons from the margin. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 10(3), 411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Ryan, J. (1996). Schooling for change: reinventing education for early adolescents. London: The Falmer Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H. (2000). Administrative effectiveness in higher education: improving assessment procedures. Research in Higher Education, 41(6), 663–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, P. (2000). Students with disabilities in higher education: Initial findings of the survey on provision for students with disabilities in higher education for the academic year 1998/9. Dublin: Ahead

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. (2001). The experience of higher education from the perspective of disabled students. Disability and Society, 16(4), 597–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, A. (1996). Reflecting on researching disability and higher education, In Barton L. (Eds), Disabilities and society: Emerging issues and insights London: Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. H. (2001). Social-cognitive predictors of first-year college persistence: The importance of proximal assessment. Research in Higher Education, 42(6), 633–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M., Mc Neela, E., Shevlin, M., & Daly, T. (2000). Hidden voices: Young people with disabilities speak about their second level schooling. Cork: South West Regional Authority

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J., & Steinberg, S. (1993). A tentative description of postformal thinking: The critical confrontation with cognitive theory. Harvard Educational Review, 63(3), 296–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T. (2002). Learning from schools. Higher Education, 44(2),283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konur, O. (2002). Assessment of disabled students in higher education: current public policy issues. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Donnell, P. (2003). Developments in special education in Ireland: Deep structures and policy making. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(3), 259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbashian, A., Huon, G. F., & Bird, K. D. (2004). Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education, 47(2), 161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, R. (2002). Entrance examinations and remedial education in Japanese higher education. Higher Education, 43(1), 27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitko, A. (1996). Educational assessment of students. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, T., Rigmor, G., & McCausland, H. (2000). Inclusive education in universities: Why it is important and how it might be achieved. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(1), 63–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., & Blythe, T. (1994). Putting understanding up front. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. W. (2000). Organizational practices enhancing the influence of student assessment information in academic decisions. Research in Higher Education, 41(1), 21–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (2000). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. (2001). Introduction: the global context of disability, In M. Priestley (Eds), Disability and the life course: Global perspectives Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarstein, V. A., & Peterson, P. A. (2001). Assessment of cooperative learning: A goal-criterion approach. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. P., Scott, K., & Verre, J. (1994). Symposium: Equity in educational assessment. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Reindal, S. M. (1995). Some problems encountered by disabled students at the University of Oslo—whose responsibility? The European Journal of Special Needs, 10(3), 227–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J., & Struhs, J. (2004). University education for all? Barriers to full inclusion of students with disabilities in Australian universities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(1), 73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3), 299–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2002). Identifying academics’ orientations to assessment practice. Higher Education, 43(2), 173–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skilbeck, M., & Connell, H. (2000). Access and equity in higher education: An international perspective on issues and strategies Dublin: Higher Education Authority

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinklin, T., & Hall, J. (1999). Getting round obstacles: Students with disabilities’ experiences in higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher education, 24(2), 183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä P. (1998). Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students’ learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education, 36(2), 209–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. (1998). Assessment and the challenge of skepticism, In Carr D. (Eds), Education, knowledge and truth. Beyond the postmodern impasse. (pp. 221–236). London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Willie, C. V. (1987). On excellence and equity in higher education. Journal of Negro Education, 56(4), 485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. W. (2000). Sex differences on the SAT: An analysis of demographic and educational variables. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 401–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Education Department, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland

    Joan Hanafin, Michael Shevlin, Mairin Kenny & Eileen Mc Neela

Authors
  1. Joan Hanafin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Shevlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mairin Kenny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eileen Mc Neela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Shevlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanafin, J., Shevlin, M., Kenny, M. et al. Including young people with disabilities: Assessment challenges in higher education. High Educ 54, 435–448 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9005-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation