The Ethics of Biobanking: Key Issues and Controversies
The ethics of biobanking is one of the most controversial issues in current bioethics and public health debates. For some, biobanks offer the possibility of unprecedented advances which will revolutionise research and improve the health of future generations. For others they are worrying repositories of personal information and tissue which will be used without sufficient respect for those from whom they came. Wherever one stands on this spectrum, from an ethics perspective biobanks are revolutionary. Traditional ethical safeguards of informed consent and confidentiality, for example, simply don’t work for the governance of biobanks and as a result new ethical structures are required. Thus it is not too great a claim to say that biobanks require a rethinking of our ethical assumptions and frameworks which we have applied generally to other issues in ethics. This special issue is dedicated to addressing these issues from the different perspectives of law, philosophy, medical ...
- Allen, J, McNamara, B (2011) Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research. Bioethics 25: pp. 155-166 CrossRef
- Austin, L. M., Lemmens, T. (2009). Privacy, consent, and governance. In K. Dierickx & P. Pascal Borry (Eds.). New challenges for biobanks: Ethics, law and governance, 2009. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1538512.
- Brock, DW (2001) Genetics and confidentiality. American Journal of Bioethics 1: pp. 34-35 CrossRef
- Casado Da Rocha, A, Seoane, JA (2008) Alternative consent models for Biobanks: The new Spanish law on biomedical research. Bioethics 22: pp. 440-447 CrossRef
- Cordell, S., Bellivier, F., Widdows, H., Noivelle, C. (2011). Lost property? Legal compensation for destroyed sperm: A reflection and comparison drawing on UK and French perspectives. Forthcoming in Journal of Medical Ethics. (Published Online June 13 2011. 10.1136/jme.2010.042036).
- Declaration of Helsinki (2008). Section 24. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.
- Fortin, S, Pathmasiri, S, Grintuch, R, Deschenes, M (2011) Access arrangements’ for Biobanks: A fine line between facilitating and hindering collaboration. Public Health Genomics 14: pp. 104-114 CrossRef
- Harmon, SHE, Laurie, GT (2010) Yearworth Vs North Bristol NHS Trust: Property, Principles, Precedents and Paradigms. Cambridge Law Journal 69: pp. 476-493 CrossRef
- Illes, J, Kirschen, MP, Edwards, E, Stanford, LR, Bandettini, P, Cho, MK, Ford, PJ, Glover, GH, Kulynych, J, Macklin, R, Michael, DB, Wolf, SM (2006) Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research. Science 311: pp. 783-784 CrossRef
- Johnston, C, Kaye, J (2004) Does the UK Biobank have a legal obligation to feedback individual findings to participants?. Medical Law Review 12: pp. 239-267 CrossRef
- Manson, NC, O’Neill, O (2007) Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- Maschke, KJ (2006) Alternative consent approaches for biobank research. Lancet Oncology 7: pp. 193-194 CrossRef
- McHale, J (2006) ‘Appropriate Consent’ and the use of human material for research purposes: The competent adult. Clinical Ethics 1: pp. 195-199 CrossRef
- Miller, FG, Mello, MM, Joffe, S (2008) Incidental findings in human subjects research: what do investigators owe research participants?. Journal of Law and Medical.Ethics 36: pp. 271-279 CrossRef
- Mitchell, GR, Happe, K (2001) Informed consent after the human genome project. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 4: pp. 375-406 CrossRef
- Nuremberg Code. (1949). Directives for human experimentation. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html. 2008.
- O’Neill, O (2002) Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge Univerity Press, Cambridge CrossRef
- Rothstein, MA (2005) Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33: pp. 89-101 CrossRef
- UK Biobank Ethics and Governance Framework. (2007). http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/docs/20071011_EGF_Version_3_1_0October_2007withTOR.pdf.
- Widdows, H (2007) Conceptualising the self in the genetic Era. Health Care Analysis 15: pp. 5-12 CrossRef
- Widdows, H Reconceptualising genetics: Challenges to traditional medical ethics. In: Lenk, C, Hoppe, N, Andorno, R eds. (2007) Ethics and law of intellectual property: Current problems in politics, science and technology. Ashgate, Aldershot
- Widdows, H Constructing communal models of governance. In: Widdows, H, Mullen, C eds. (2009) The governance of genetic information: Who decides?. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRef
- Widdows, H (2009) Between the individual and the community: The impact of genetics on ethical models. New Genetics and Society 28: pp. 173-188 CrossRef
- Winickoff, DE (2003) Governing population genomics. Jurimetrics 43: pp. 187-228
- Winickoff, DE, Winickoff, RN (2003) The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. New England Journal of Medicine 349: pp. 1180-1184 CrossRef
- Yearworth & ors v Bristol NHS Trust (2009). EWCA Civ 37 (04 February 2009).
- The Ethics of Biobanking: Key Issues and Controversies
Health Care Analysis
Volume 19, Issue 3 , pp 207-219
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links