Skip to main content
Log in

Power, Technology and Social Studies of Health Care: An Infrastructural Inversion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Power, dominance, and hierarchy are prevalent analytical terms in social studies of health care. Power is often seen as residing in medical structures, institutions, discourses, or ideologies. While studies of medical power often draw on Michel Foucault, this understanding is quite different from his proposal to study in detail the “strategies, the networks, the mechanisms, all those techniques by which a decision is accepted” [Foucault, M. (1988). In Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–84 (pp. 96–109). New York: Routledge]. This suggestion turns power into a topic worth investigating in its own right rather than a basic analytical resource. It also suggests that technologies form an integral part of the networks and mechanisms, which produce and redistribute power in medical practice. The paper first engages critically with a number of recent discussions of technology and power in health care analysis. It then formulates an alternative conception of this relationship by drawing on Foucault and historian of science and technology Geoffrey C. Bowker’s notions of infrastructural inversion and information mythology. Illustration is provided through a case study of a wireless nursing call system in a Canadian hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A detailed case-study is presented in Jensen [15]. Analysis of the normative implications of the study are outlined in Jensen [16].

  2. I am grateful to Servane Mason who provided the following example.

  3. Just as interestingly, this literal disconnection did not appear to have significantly impeded work-flow on the ward.

References

  1. Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, W. (2001). Politics out of history. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowker, G. (1995). Information Mythology—the world of/as information. In L. Bud-Frierman (Ed.), Information Acumen: The understanding and use of knowledge in modern business (pp. 231–47). London: International Thomson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charles-Jones, H., Latimer, J., & May, C. (2003). Transforming general practice: The redistribution of medical work in primary care. Sociology of health and illness, 25(1), 71–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cowley, S., Mitcheson, J., & Houston, A. M. (2004). Structuring health needs assessments: The medicalisation of health visiting. Sociology of health and illness, 26(5), 503–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dent, M. (1999). Professional judgement and the role of clinical guidelines and evidence-based medicine (EBM): Netherlands, Britain and Sweden. Journal of interprofessional care, 13(2), 151–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Foucault, M. (1988). On power. In L. D. Kritzman (Ed.), Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–84 (pp. 96–109). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: Birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frankford, D. (1994). Scientism and economics in the regulation of health care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 19(4), 773–799.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gomart, E. (2004). Surprised by methadone: In praise of drug substitution treatment in a French clinic. Body & Society, 10, 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Latour, B. (1987). The enlightenment without the critique: A word on Michel Serres’ philosophy. In A. P. Griffiths (Ed.), Contemporary french philosophy (pp. 83–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Griffiths, L. (2001). Categorising to exclude: The discursive construction of cases in community mental health teams. Sociology of Health and Illness, 23(5), 678–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heath, C., Luff, P., & Svensson, M. S. (2003). Technology and medical practice. Sociology of health and illness, 25, 75–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogle, L. (2002). Claims and disclaimers: Whose expertise counts? Medical Anthropology, 21, 275–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jensen, C. B. (2006). The wireless nursing call system: Politics of discourse, technology and dependability in a pilot project. CSCW, 15(5–6), 419–441.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen, C. B. (2007). Sorting attachments: Usefulness of STS in healthcare practice and policy. Science as Culture, 16(3), 237–251 (Special issue ‘Unpacking Intervention in Science and Technology Studies).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Latour, B. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together—the sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35(3), 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. May, C., & Ellis, N. T. (2001). When protocols fail: Technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of ‘facts’ about a telemedicine clinic. Sociology of Health and Illness, 53, 989–1002.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mykhalovskiy, E., & Weir, L. (2004). The problem of evidence-based medicine: Directions for social science. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1059–1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Norwood, F. (2006). The ambivalent chaplain: Negotiating structural and ideological difference on the margins of modern-day hospital medicine. Medical Anthropology, 25(1), 1–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olesen, F., & Markussen, R. (2003). Reconfigured medication: Writing medicine in a sociotechnical practice. Configurations, 11(3), 351–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prout, A. (1996). Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociology of health and illness, 18(2), 198–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003) The practice of medical technology. Sociology of health and illness, 25, 97–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tjora, A. H. (2000). The technological mediation of the nursing-medical boundary. Sociology of health and illness, 22(6), 721–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vikkelsø, S. (2005). Subtle redistribution of work, attention and risks: Electronic patient records and organizational consequences. Scandinavian Journal of Informatics, 17(1), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zuboff, S. (1989). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casper Bruun Jensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, C.B. Power, Technology and Social Studies of Health Care: An Infrastructural Inversion. Health Care Anal 16, 355–374 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0076-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0076-2

Keywords

Navigation