Abstract
Power, dominance, and hierarchy are prevalent analytical terms in social studies of health care. Power is often seen as residing in medical structures, institutions, discourses, or ideologies. While studies of medical power often draw on Michel Foucault, this understanding is quite different from his proposal to study in detail the “strategies, the networks, the mechanisms, all those techniques by which a decision is accepted” [Foucault, M. (1988). In Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–84 (pp. 96–109). New York: Routledge]. This suggestion turns power into a topic worth investigating in its own right rather than a basic analytical resource. It also suggests that technologies form an integral part of the networks and mechanisms, which produce and redistribute power in medical practice. The paper first engages critically with a number of recent discussions of technology and power in health care analysis. It then formulates an alternative conception of this relationship by drawing on Foucault and historian of science and technology Geoffrey C. Bowker’s notions of infrastructural inversion and information mythology. Illustration is provided through a case study of a wireless nursing call system in a Canadian hospital.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
I am grateful to Servane Mason who provided the following example.
Just as interestingly, this literal disconnection did not appear to have significantly impeded work-flow on the ward.
References
Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brown, W. (2001). Politics out of history. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Bowker, G. (1995). Information Mythology—the world of/as information. In L. Bud-Frierman (Ed.), Information Acumen: The understanding and use of knowledge in modern business (pp. 231–47). London: International Thomson Publishing.
Charles-Jones, H., Latimer, J., & May, C. (2003). Transforming general practice: The redistribution of medical work in primary care. Sociology of health and illness, 25(1), 71–92.
Cowley, S., Mitcheson, J., & Houston, A. M. (2004). Structuring health needs assessments: The medicalisation of health visiting. Sociology of health and illness, 26(5), 503–526.
Dent, M. (1999). Professional judgement and the role of clinical guidelines and evidence-based medicine (EBM): Netherlands, Britain and Sweden. Journal of interprofessional care, 13(2), 151–64.
Foucault, M. (1988). On power. In L. D. Kritzman (Ed.), Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–84 (pp. 96–109). New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: Birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
Frankford, D. (1994). Scientism and economics in the regulation of health care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 19(4), 773–799.
Gomart, E. (2004). Surprised by methadone: In praise of drug substitution treatment in a French clinic. Body & Society, 10, 85–110.
Latour, B. (1987). The enlightenment without the critique: A word on Michel Serres’ philosophy. In A. P. Griffiths (Ed.), Contemporary french philosophy (pp. 83–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Griffiths, L. (2001). Categorising to exclude: The discursive construction of cases in community mental health teams. Sociology of Health and Illness, 23(5), 678–700.
Heath, C., Luff, P., & Svensson, M. S. (2003). Technology and medical practice. Sociology of health and illness, 25, 75–96.
Hogle, L. (2002). Claims and disclaimers: Whose expertise counts? Medical Anthropology, 21, 275–306.
Jensen, C. B. (2006). The wireless nursing call system: Politics of discourse, technology and dependability in a pilot project. CSCW, 15(5–6), 419–441.
Jensen, C. B. (2007). Sorting attachments: Usefulness of STS in healthcare practice and policy. Science as Culture, 16(3), 237–251 (Special issue ‘Unpacking Intervention in Science and Technology Studies).
Latour, B. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together—the sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35(3), 298–310.
May, C., & Ellis, N. T. (2001). When protocols fail: Technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of ‘facts’ about a telemedicine clinic. Sociology of Health and Illness, 53, 989–1002.
Mykhalovskiy, E., & Weir, L. (2004). The problem of evidence-based medicine: Directions for social science. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1059–1069.
Norwood, F. (2006). The ambivalent chaplain: Negotiating structural and ideological difference on the margins of modern-day hospital medicine. Medical Anthropology, 25(1), 1–29.
Olesen, F., & Markussen, R. (2003). Reconfigured medication: Writing medicine in a sociotechnical practice. Configurations, 11(3), 351–381.
Prout, A. (1996). Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociology of health and illness, 18(2), 198–219.
Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.
Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003) The practice of medical technology. Sociology of health and illness, 25, 97–114.
Tjora, A. H. (2000). The technological mediation of the nursing-medical boundary. Sociology of health and illness, 22(6), 721–741.
Vikkelsø, S. (2005). Subtle redistribution of work, attention and risks: Electronic patient records and organizational consequences. Scandinavian Journal of Informatics, 17(1), 3–30.
Zuboff, S. (1989). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jensen, C.B. Power, Technology and Social Studies of Health Care: An Infrastructural Inversion. Health Care Anal 16, 355–374 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0076-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0076-2