Abstract
Much effort has been made to search for signatures of past natural selection in DNA sequences. However, currently acting selection is rarely detected in natural populations because of its rarity, low detection power of available methods, or both. Here, we develop a new test to detect viability selection over a single generation. In this test, one specific type of chromosomes is chosen as a reference, while all other chromosomes are designated as “focal”. The test compares measures of variation between two groups of “focal” chromosomes: those found in reference/focal heterozygous individuals and those found in focal/focal homozygous individuals. In the absence of selection, we do not expect differences between these two groups as long as mating is random. On the other hand, currently acting selection can cause differences in some measures of variation. We applied this test to typing data for In(2L)t inversion polymorphism in a Drosophila melanogaster population, using “standard” (non-inverted) chromosomes as the focal class. Although the frequencies of In(2L)t and standard chromosomes did not deviate from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, we found differences in allele frequency and the number of haplotypes between the two groups of standard chromosomes. This new test, in conjunction with the Hardy–Weinberg test, may shed light on how often strong selection is operating in extant populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguadé M (1988) Restriction map variation at the Adh locus of Drosophila melanogaster in inverted and noninverted chromosomes. Genetics 119:135–140
Allison AC (1956) The sickle-cell and haemoglobin C genes in some African populations. Ann Hum Genet 21:67–89
Andolfatto P, Kreitman M (2000) Molecular variation at the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint site in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 154:1681–1691
Andolfatto P, Wall JD, Kreitman M (1999) Unusual haplotype structure at the proximal breakpoint of In(2L)t in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 153:1297–1311
Bénassi V, Depaulis F, Meghlaoui GK, Veuille M (1999) Partial sweeping of variation at the Fbp2 locus in a West African population of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol 16:347–353
Black FL, Hedrick PW (1997) Strong balancing selection at HLA loci: evidence from segregation in South Amerindian families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12452–12456
Depaulis F, Veuille M (1998). Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model. Mol Biol Evol 15:1788–1790
Depaulis F, Brazier L, Veuille M (1999) Selective sweep at the Drosophila melanogaster Suppressor of Hairless locus and its association with the In(2L)t inversion polymorphism. Genetics 152:1017–1024
Depaulis F, Brazier L, Mousset S, Turbe A, Veuille M (2000) Selective sweep near In(2L)t inversion breakpoint in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res 76:149–158
Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York
Fay JC, Wu C-I (2000) Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155:1405–1413
Fu Y-X (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147:915–925
Fu Y-X, Li W-H (1993) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133:693–709
Hudson RR, Bailey K, Skarecky D, Kwiatowski J, Ayala FJ (1994) Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase Sod region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 136:1329–1340
Inoue Y (1979) The fate of polymorphic inversions of Drosophila melanogaster transferred to laboratory conditions. Jpn J Genet 54:83–96
Inoue Y, Watada M, Itoh M (2002) Inversion polymorphisms in populations of Drosophila melanogaster in the South-West Islands of Japan: comparisons with the mainland populations. Genetica 114:25–33
Knibb WR, Oakeshott JG, Gibson JB (1981) Chromosome inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Latitudinal clines and associations between inversions in Australasian populations. Genetics 98:833–847
Lewontin RC, Cockerham CC (1959) The goodness-of-fit test for detecting natural selection in random mating populations. Evolution 13:561–564
Lewontin RC, Kojima K (1960) The evolutionary dynamics of complex polymorphisms. Evolution 14:458–472
Mettler LE, Voelker RA, Mukai T (1977) Inversion clines in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 87:169–176
Mukai T, Tachida H, Ichinose M (1980) Selection for viability at loci controlling protein polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster is very weak at most. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:4857–4860
Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM, Levine HZP, Richter DJ, Schaffner SF et al (2002) Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419:832–837
Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595
Takano-Shimizu T, Kawabe A, Inomata N, Nanba N, Kondo R, Inoue Y, Itoh M (2004) Interlocus nonrandom association of polymorphisms in Drosophila chemoreceptor genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14156–14161
Umina PA, Weeks AR, Kearney MR, McKechnie SW, Hoffmann AA (2005) A rapid shift in a classic clinal pattern in Drosophila reflecting climate change. Science 308:691–693
Acknowledgments
We thank Y. Ishii, Y. Sado, K. Suzuki, K. Mitsugi-Takeshita for technical assistance; S. Hayashi, Y. Hiromi, and A.E. Szmidt for valuable help; T. Ohta for useful suggestions, and Tropical Biosphere Research Center (the Iriomote Experimental Station) of Ryukyu University for experimental facilities for fly collection. This work was supported in part by grants from the Yamada Science Foundation (TT-S, NI), the Mitsubishi Foundation (TT-S), and National Institute of Genetics Cooperative Research Program (NI, MI, RK, TT-S).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inomata, N., Itoh, M., Kondo, R. et al. A new test for detecting ongoing selection. Genetica 133, 321–334 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-007-9216-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-007-9216-8