Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of topography and land management on soil nutrients variability in Northeast China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well recognized that soil nutrient content varies across the landscape, but the nature and degree of that variability with respect to landscape position is still poorly understood and documented. Slope steepness and aspect, climate and land management are known to affect soil nutrient distribution in a field, but the relative and cumulative strengths of these effects are less well investigated. Four hundred and thirty-five topsoil samples collected from a typical Mollisol under intensive crop management in Northeast China were used to analyze the influence of landscape position, climate and land management on the spatial variability of soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP). Both geo-statistics and traditional statistics were used to analyze the data, and significant spatial variability was found for SOM (22.5–86.6 g kg−1), TN (0.98–4.26 g kg−1) and TP (0.26–1.80 g kg−1). The distribution of all 3 nutrients was found to be influenced by human activity and by landscape. When both slope degree and slope aspect were considered, the results differed from when only aspect or steepness was considered independently. In a northern aspect, SOM and TN were significantly higher on slopes of 0–2% than on steeper slopes, in a south-eastern aspect they were significantly higher on slopes of 0–2, 2–3 and 3–4% than on slopes >4% and in a south-western aspect those nutrients on slopes of 2–4% were significantly higher than on slopes of >5%. Cross-slope tillage effectively increased SOM, TN and TP by 33.8, 23.3 and 22.4%, respectively compared to down-slope tillage, indicating the potential for adoption of a nutrient-retaining management practice in the Mollisol region of northeast China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agassi M, Morin J, Shainberg I (1990) Slope, aspect, and phosphogypsum effects on runoff and erosion. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1102–1106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DW (1987) Pedogenesis in the grasslands and adjacent forests of the Great Plains. Adv Soil Sci 7:53–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Atreya KS, Sharma RM, Bajracharya NP (2008) Developing a sustainable agro-system for central Nepal using reduced tillage and straw mulching. J Environ Manage 88:547–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balasundram SK, Robert PC, Mulla DJ, Allan DL (2006) Relationship between oil palm yield and soil fertility as affected by topography in an Indonesian plantation. Soil Plant Anal 37:1321–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barton AP, Fullen MA, Mitchell DJ (2004) Effects of soil conservation measures on erosion rates and crop productivity on subtropical Ultisols in Yunnan province, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:343–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottcher AB, Monke EJ, Huggins LF (1981) Nutrient and sediment loadings from a subsurface drainage system. Trans ASAE 24(5):1221–1226

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (2000) Nature and properties of soils. Macmillan publishing company, New York, pp 392–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler DD, Randall GW, Koskinen WC, Wyse DL (1993) Atrazine and alachlor losses from subsurface tile drainage of a clay loam soil. J Environ Qual 22:583–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1993) Soil variability: a late 20th century view. Soils Fertilizers 56:529–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBusk WF, Reddy KR, Koch MS, Wang Y (1994) Spatial distribution of soil nutrients in a Northern Everglades Marsh: water conservation area 2A. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo A (2003) Spatial variability of soil properties in a floodplain in Northwest Spain. Ecosystems 6:564–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RAM, Gerrard AJ (2003) Runoff and soil erosion on cultivated rainfed terraces in the middle hills of Nepal. Appl Geogr 22:23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry LE, David MB, Smith KM, Kovacic DA (1998) Nitrogen cycling and tile drainage nitrate loss in a corn/soybean watershed. Agric Ecosyst Environ 68:85–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gessler PE, Moore ID, McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1995) Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong X, Brueck H, Giese KM, Zhang L, Sattelmacher B, Lin S (2008) Slope aspect has effects on productivity and species composition of hilly grassland in the Xilin River basin, Inner Mongolia, China. J Arid Environ 72:483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald S (ed) (2006) Environmental soil-landscape modeling—geographic information technologies and pedometrics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn R, Dom H, Sowi ska-Jurkiewicz A, Van Ouwerkerk C (1995) Soil compaction processes and their effects on the structure of arable soils and the environment. Soil Tillage Res 35(1–2):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CY (2000) Soil science. China Agriculture Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowkin V, Schoenau JJ (1998) Impact of tillage and landscape position on nitrogen availability and yield of spring wheat in brown soil zone in south-western Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 78:563–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1998) Soil erosion impact on agronomic productivity and environmental quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 17:319–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Wang Z, Zhang B, Song K, Li X, Li J, Li F, Duan H (2006) Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of related factors in croplands of the black soil region, northeast China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu RK (1999) Method for agrochemical analysis of soil. China Agriculture, Science and Technology press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Malo DD, Worcester BK (1975) Soil fertility and crop responses at selected landscape positions. Agron J 67:397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Mendonca Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (2005) Soil erosion and conservation, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin AP, Anderson DW, Mellinger M (1994) Spatial variability of wheat yield, soil properties and erosion in hummocky terrain. Can J Soil Sci 74:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh S, Schoenau J, Si B, Zeleke T, Qian P (2008) Soil properties, yield, and landscape relationships in south-central Saskatchewan Canada. J Plant Nutr 31:539–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver MA (1987) Geostatistics and its application to soil science. Soil Use Manag 3(1):8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver MA, Webster R, Slocum K (2000) Filtering SPOT imagery by kriging analysis. J Remote Sens 21(4):735–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SJ, Vlek PLG (2002) Environmental correlation of three-dimensional spatial soil variability: a comparison of three adaptive techniques. Geoderma 109:117–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RI ES (2008) ArcMap user’s guide, release 9.3. ESRI, Redlands California

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP (2000) GeoStatistics for the environmental sciences, Gamma design software

  • Rundel PW (1981) The matorral zone of central Chile. In: di Castri F, Goodall DW, Spetch RL (eds) Mediterranean type shublands. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 175–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen S (1998) Soil fertility in China. Chinese Agriculture Press, Beijing, p 484 in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Silveira ML, Comerford NB, Reddy KR, Prenger J, Debusk WF (2009) Soil properties as indicators of disturbance in forest ecosystems of Georgia, USA. Ecol Indic 9(4):740–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil survey service of Hailun (1985) Soil science of Hailun journal. Heilongjiang Press, Harbin

    Google Scholar 

  • Soon YK, Malhi SS (2005) Soil nitrogen dynamics as affected by landscape position and nitrogen fertilizer. Can J Soil Sci 85:579–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Srividya A, Michael E, Palaniyandi M, Pani SP, Das PK (2002) A geostatical analysis of the geographic distribution of lymphatic filariasis prevalence in southern India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67(5):480–489

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang GA, Yang X (2006) Experimental course of ArcGIS for spatial analysis of geography information system. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang CS, Drury CF, Soultani M, van Wesenbeeck IJ, Ng HYF, Gaynor JD, Welacky WT (1998) Effect of controlled drainage and tillage on soil structure and tile drainage nitrate loss at the field scale. Water Sci Technol 38(4–5):103–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Doren CA, Stauffer RS, Kidder EH (1950) Effect of contour farming on soil loss and runoff. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 15:413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verity GE, Anderson DW (1990) Soil erosion effects on soil quality and yield. Can J Soil Sci 70:471–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voroney RP, van Veen JA, Paul EA (1981) Organic C dynamics in grassland soils. 2. Model validation and simulation of the long-term effects of cultivation and rainfall erosion. Can J Soil Sci 61:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walson DA, Laflen JM (1986) Soil strength, slope, and rainfall intensity effect on interrill erosion. Trans ASAE 29:98–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YF, Cai YC (1988) Studies on genesis, types and characteristics of the soils of the Xilin River Basin. Research on grassland ecosystem (No. 3). Science Press, Beijing, pp 23–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Xiao D, Zhang X, Li X, Li X (2006) Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in relation to environmental factors of a typical small watershed in the black soil region, northeast China. Environ Monit Assess 121:597–613

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West TO, Post WM (2002) Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1930–1946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan BX, Yang YH, Liu XT (2008) Character and trend of soil erosion in black soil north-eastern China. Soil Water Conserv China 12:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost RS, Uehara G, Fox RL (1982) Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas II. Kriging. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:1033–1037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XY, Sui YY, Zhang XD, Meng K, Herbert SJ (2007) Spatial variability of nutrient properties in black soil of Northeast China. Pedosphere 17(1):19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the Project of Heilongjiang Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars and National High-tech R&D National Natural Science Foundation Program of China for partial support of this research, under grant numbers Jc200718 and 2008AA10z212.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingyi Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Huffman, T. et al. Influence of topography and land management on soil nutrients variability in Northeast China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 89, 427–438 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9406-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9406-0

Keywords

Navigation