Are Causality Violations Undesirable? Authors Hunter Monroe International Monetary Fund Article

First Online: 29 October 2008 Received: 11 January 2008 Accepted: 21 October 2008 DOI :
10.1007/s10701-008-9254-9

Cite this article as: Monroe, H. Found Phys (2008) 38: 1065. doi:10.1007/s10701-008-9254-9
Abstract Causality violations are typically seen as unrealistic and undesirable features of a physical model. The following points out three reasons why causality violations, which Bonnor and Steadman identified even in solutions to the Einstein equation referring to ordinary laboratory situations, are not necessarily undesirable. First, a space-time in which every causal curve can be extended into a closed causal curve is singularity free—a necessary property of a globally applicable physical theory. Second, a causality-violating space-time exhibits a nontrivial topology—no closed timelike curve (CTC) can be homotopic among CTCs to a point, or that point would not be causally well behaved—and nontrivial topology has been explored as a model of particles. Finally, if every causal curve in a given space-time passes through an event horizon, a property which can be called “causal censorship”, then that space-time with event horizons excised would still be causally well behaved.

Keywords General relativity Differential geometry Spacetime topology In honor of the retirement from Davidson College of Dr. L. Richardson King, an extraordinary teacher and mathematician. An earlier version (gr-qc/0609054v2 ) was selected as co-winner of the CTC Essay Prize set by Queen Mary College, University of London. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and should not be attributed to the International Monetary Fund, its Executive Board, or its management. This paper was not prepared using official resources. Comments are appreciated from anonymous referees and from participants in seminars at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Davidson College.

References 1.

Bonnor, W.B.: Closed timelike curves in classical relativity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D

12 , 1705–1708 (2003)

CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 2.

Bonnor, W.B., Steadman, B.R.: The double-Kerr solution. Class. Quantum Gravity

21 , 2723–2732 (2004)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 3.

Bonnor, W.B., Steadman, B.R.: Exact solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations with closed timelike curves. Gen. Relativ. Gravit.

37 , 1833 (2005)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 4.

Hawking, S.W., Ellis, G.F.R.: The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973)

MATH 5.

Senovilla, J.M.M.: Singularity theorems and their consequences. Gen. Relativ. Gravit.

30 , 701–848 (1998)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 6.

Tipler, F.J.: Singularities and causality violation. Ann. Phys.

108 , 1–36 (1977)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 7.

Krasnikov, S.: The end of the time machine. Class. Quantum Gravity

19 , 4109 (2002)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 8.

Geroch, R.: Topology in general relativity. J. Math. Phys.

8 , 782–786 (1967)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 9.

Bernal, A.N., Sanchez, M.: Globally hyperbolic spacetimes can be defined as causal instead of strongly causal. Class. Quantum Gravity

24 , 745 (2007)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 10.

Friedman, J.L., Schleich, K., Witt, D.M.: Topological censorship. Phys. Rev. Lett.

71 , 1486–1489 (1993)

CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 11.

Misner, C.W., Wheeler, J.A.: Classical physics as geometry: gravitation, electromagnetism, unquantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space. Ann. Phys.

2 , 525–603 (1957)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 12.

Lickorish, W.: Homeomorphisms of non-orientable two-manifolds. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.

59 , 307 (1963)

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet 13.

Gibbons, G.W., Hawking, S.W.: Selection rules for topology change. Commun. Math. Phys.

148 , 345–352 (1992)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 14.

Gibbons, G.W., Hawking, S.W.: Kinks and topology change. Phys. Rev. Lett.

69 , 1719–1721 (1992)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 15.

Borde, A.: Topology change in classical general relativity.

gr-qc/9406053 (1994)

16.

Avez, A.: Essais de géométrie riemannienne hyperbolique globale. Applications a la relativité générale. Ann. Inst. Fourier

13 , 105–190 (1963)

MATH MathSciNet 17.

Galloway, G.J.: Closed timelike geodesics. Trans. Am. Math. Soc.

285 , 379–388 (1984)

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet 18.

Garcia-Parrado, A., Senovilla, J.M.M.: Causal structures and causal boundaries. Class. Quantum Gravity

22 , R1–R84 (2005)

MATH CrossRef ADS MathSciNet 19.

Flaherty, F.J.: Proc. Am. Math. Soc.

48 , 199–202 (1975)

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet 20.

Smith, J.W.: Fundamental groups on a Lorentz manifold. Am. J. Math.

82 , 873–890 (1967)

CrossRef 21.

Hawking, S., Penrose, R.: The Nature of Space and Time. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)

MATH © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008