Philosophy and Complexity
- Gil C. Santos
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The development of contemporary science has focused the attention of both scientists and philosophers on the problem of complexity. If science ultimately aims to propose explanations, predictions, types of analysis and modeling, and even to indicate ways to solve some problems of our world, complexity cannot be neglected and underestimated (cf. Heylighen et al. 1999 and Gershenson et al. 2007).
It is true that there is no consensual and univocal definition of the notion of complexity, and that we find it very often used in vague and loose ways, but it is possible to try to understand better its meaning if we consider the historical–theoretical context where that notion first emerged in the contemporary philosophy of science.
We usually consider something complex when we feel that it is not easily analyzable, understandable, explainable and/or predictable in the way that we were used to do it—that is, using the procedures, models or methodologies that we have at our disposal. Now, if we l ...
- Atlan, H. (2011). Noise as a principle of self-organization. In S. Geroulanos & T. Meyers (Eds.), Selected writings: On self-organization, philosophy, bioethics, and judaism, chapter 3 (pp. 95–113). New York: Fordham University Press.
- Auyang, S. (1997). Foundations of complex-systems theories: In economics, evolutionary biology, and statistical physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bachelard, G. (1984). The new scientific spirit. Boston, MA: Beacon Press [translation by A. Goldhammer of the original. (1934). Le nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris: PUF].
- Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (1993). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (new edition: 2010, Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books).
- Cambel, A. B. (1993). Applied chaos theory. A paradigm for complexity. San Diego: Academic Press.
- Gershenson, C., Aerts, D., & Edmonds, B. (Eds.). (2007). Worldviews, science and Us. Philosophy and complexity. Singapore: World Scientific.
- Heylighen, F., Bollen, J., & Riegler, A. (Eds.). (1999). The evolution of complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Mitchell, S. (2009). Unsimple truths: Science, complexity, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
- Oyama, S. (2000). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution (2th ed., revised and expanded). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity. American Scientist, 36, 536–544.
- Wimsatt, W. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Philosophy and Complexity
Foundations of Science
Volume 18, Issue 4 , pp 681-686
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Gil C. Santos (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Philosophy of Science, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, C4, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal