Data Analysis: Models or Techniques?
- Paul Humphreys
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In this commentary to Napoletani et al. (Found Sci 16:1–20, 2011), we argue that the approach the authors adopt suggests that neural nets are mathematical techniques rather than models of cognitive processing, that the general approach dates as far back as Ptolemy, and that applied mathematics is more than simply applying results from pure mathematics.
- Baik J.-J., Paek J.-S. (2000) A neural network model for predicting typhoon intensity. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 78: 857–869
- Humphreys P. (2004) Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. Oxford University Press, New York CrossRef
- Napoletani D., Panza M., Struppa D. C. (2011) Agnostic science: Towards a philosophy of data analysis. Foundations of Science 16: 1–20 CrossRef
- Data Analysis: Models or Techniques?
Foundations of Science
Volume 18, Issue 3 , pp 579-581
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Data analysis
- Mathematical models
- Neural nets
- Applied mathematics
- Paul Humphreys (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Corcoran Department of Philosophy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA