Being Post-Positivist . . . or Just Talking About it?
- Robert C. Scharff
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Hans Ruin and Patrick Heelan join me in celebrating the rise of post-positivist and phenomenological approaches to scientific and technological practice. Yet as they both know, I am also concerned that the very presence of all the new accounts which give voice to this trend may tempt us into concluding prematurely that the traditional understanding of science and technology has already been displaced. With especially Ruin’s encouragement, I expand my original discussion of this concern by explaining why I agree with him about the ontologically mistaken suppositions that one might become post-positivistic by doing philosophy “meta-philosophically,” or become phenomenological by making “life” more basic that “nature.”
- Goeminne G. (2011) Postphenomenology and the politics of sustainable technology. Foundations of Science 16(2–3): 173–194 CrossRef
- Heelan, P. (2011). Phenomenology, Ontology, and Quantum Physics. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9247-6.
- Ruin, H. (2011). Thinking through the prism of life. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9248-5.
- Scharff, R. (2011). “Who” is a “topical measuring” postphenomenologist and how does one get that way? Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9251-x.
- Being Post-Positivist . . . or Just Talking About it?
Foundations of Science
Volume 18, Issue 2 , pp 393-397
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Philosophy of technology
- Philosophy of science
- Philosophy of life
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA