Technology and the Myth of ‘Natural Man’ Authors
First Online: 05 October 2011 DOI:
Cite this article as: De Preester, H. Found Sci (2012) 17: 385. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9246-7 Abstract
The main suggestions and objections raised by Don Ihde and Charles Lenay to my ‘Technology and the body: the (im)possibilities of re-embodiment’ are summarized and discussed. On the one hand, I agree that we should pay more attention to whole body experience and to further resisting Cartesian assumptions in the field of cognitive neuroscience and philosophy of cognition. On the other hand, I explain that my account in no way presupposes the myth of ‘natural man’ or of a natural, delineated body from before the fall into technology.
Keywords Embodiment Technology Incorporation Extension References
Armel K. C., Ramachandran V. S. (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological 270: 1499–1506
De Preester H. (2007) The deep bodily origins of the subjective perspective: Models and their problems. Consciousness and Cognition 16(3): 604–618
De Preester H. (2011) Technology and the body: The (im)possibilities of reembodiment. Foundations of Science 16(2–3): 119–137
De Preester H., Tsakiris M. (2009) Body extension versus body-incorporation: Is there a need for a body-model?. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(3): 307–319
De Preester, H. (Forthcoming). The bodily origins of technics: Heidegger, cognitive science and the prosthetic subject. In: J. Kiverstein, M. Wheeler (Ed.),
Heidegger and cognitive science. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ihde, D. (2011). Postphenomenological re-embodiment.
Foundations of Science
Lenay, C. (2011). Separability and technical constitution.
Foundations of Science
Rochat P., Morgan R. (1995) Spatial determinants in the perception of self-produced movements by 3- to 5-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology 31: 626–636
Stieger B. (1998) Technics and time 1—the fault of epimetheus. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Tsakiris M., Prabhu G., Haggard P. (2006) Having a body
moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 15: 423–432
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011