Martha Albertson Fineman, Jack E. Jackson and Adam P. Romero (eds): Feminist and Queer Legal Theory: Intimate Encounters, Uncomfortable Conversations
- Rosie Harding
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
- Carbado, Devon. 2000. Black rights, gay rights, civil rights. UCLA Law Review 47: 1467–1519.
- Case, Mary.Ann. 2001. How high the apple pie? A few troubling questions about where, why, and how the burden of care for children should be shifted. Chicago-Kent Law Review 76: 1753–1788.
- Currah, Paisley. 2003. The transgender rights imaginary. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law 4: 705–720.
- Emens, Elizabeth. 2004. Monogamy’s law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence. NYU Review of Law and Social Change 29: 277–376.
- Fineman, Martha. 1995. The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge.
- Halley, Janet. 2006. Split decisions: How and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Kennedy, Duncan. 1993. Sexy dressing etc.: Essays on the power and politics of culture identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Rich, Adrienne. 1980. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs 5: 631–660. CrossRef
- West, Robin. 1986. Deconstructing the CLS-Fem split. Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 2: 85–94.
- Yoshino, Kenji. 2000. The epistemic contract of bisexual erasure. Stanford Law Review 52: 353–463. CrossRef
- Martha Albertson Fineman, Jack E. Jackson and Adam P. Romero (eds): Feminist and Queer Legal Theory: Intimate Encounters, Uncomfortable Conversations
Feminist Legal Studies
Volume 21, Issue 3 , pp 311-314
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Rosie Harding (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Law, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK