Familial Cancer

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 459–468

Assessment of clinical practices among cancer genetic counselors

  • Deborah Wham
  • Thuy Vu
  • Gayun Chan-Smutko
  • Christine Kobelka
  • Diana Urbauer
  • Brandie Heald
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10689-010-9326-9

Cite this article as:
Wham, D., Vu, T., Chan-Smutko, G. et al. Familial Cancer (2010) 9: 459. doi:10.1007/s10689-010-9326-9

Abstract

Various models of cancer genetics service delivery have been published, and practice guidelines were set forth by the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) in 2004. While the demand for services has increased, there has not been a comprehensive study of current practice models. An online survey of the NSGC Familial Cancer Risk Counseling Special Interest Group was conducted to study current methods of providing clinical cancer genetics services. Respondents were asked to quantify patient volume, support staff availability, and physician involvement in cases. Two case examples were used to further describe current practices including the number of genetic counseling tasks performed, time spent in these tasks, and number of in-person visits versus phone encounters. Although published cancer genetic counseling guidelines advise a 3-visit model (initial consult, sample draw, and result disclosure), 29.3% of respondents have adopted a 1-visit model, where the sample is drawn at the first visit and phone disclosure replaces the third visit. The content of the initial consult does not vary significantly, and is consistent with the NSGC practice guidelines. Furthermore, 56% report spending >15 min on case preparation, and 27 respondents self-reported redundancy in tasks such as documentation. It appears that a proportion of genetic counselors are following a new model of service delivery. However, insufficient documentation and case preparation are apparent, and many respondents reported lack of support staff as a barrier to efficient patient care. Factors contributing to the variability in current practice, and how they affect efficiency, require further study.

Keywords

Cancer genetic counselingGenetic counselingHereditary breast ovarian cancerPractice efficiencyResults disclosureService delivery model

Abbreviations

NSGC

National society of genetic counselors

NSGC Cancer SIG

National society of genetic counselors familial risk cancer counseling special interest group

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Wham
    • 1
  • Thuy Vu
    • 2
  • Gayun Chan-Smutko
    • 3
  • Christine Kobelka
    • 4
  • Diana Urbauer
    • 5
  • Brandie Heald
    • 6
  1. 1.Cancer Genetic Counseling ProgramAurora Health CareMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgical OncologyUniversity of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Center for Cancer Risk AssessmentMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer CenterBostonUSA
  4. 4.Genetics DepartmentKaiser PermanenteSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Division of Quantitative SciencesUniversity of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  6. 6.Genomic Medicine InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA