The influence of spouses on household decision making under risk: an experiment in rural China
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
We study household decision making in a high-stakes experiment with a random sample of households in rural China. Spouses have to choose between risky lotteries, first separately and then jointly. We find that spouses’ individual risk preferences are more similar the richer the household and the higher the wife’s relative income contribution. A couple’s joint decision is typically very similar to the husband’s preferences, but women who contribute relatively more to the household income, women in high-income households, and women with communist party membership have a stronger influence on the joint decision.
- Abdellaoui, M., L’Haridon, O., & Paraschiv, C. (2011). Individual vs. collective behaviour: an experimental investigation of risk and time preferences in couple. Working Paper at Group HEC, France.
- Ashraf, N. (2009). Spousal control and intra-household decision making: an experimental study in the Philippines. American Economic Review, 99, 1245–1277. CrossRef
- Baker, R. J., Laury, S. K., & Williams, A. W. (2008). Comparing group and individual behavior in lottery-choice experiments. Southern Economic Journal, 75, 367–382.
- Bateman, I., & Munro, A. (2005). An experiment on risky choice amongst households. Economic Journal, 115, C176–C189. CrossRef
- Bone, J. (1998). Risk-sharing CARA individuals are collectively EU. Economics Letters, 58, 311–317. CrossRef
- Bone, J., Hey, J., & Suckling, J. (1999). Are groups more (or less) consistent than individuals? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 63–81. CrossRef
- Bone, J., Hey, J., & Suckling, J. (2004). A simple risk-sharing experiment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28, 23–38. CrossRef
- Carlsson, F., He, H., Martinsson, P., Qin, P., & Sutter, M. (2012). Household decision making in rural China. Using experiments on intertemporal choice to estimate the relative influence of spouses. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.08.010.
- Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 1–27. CrossRef
- de Palma, A., Picard, N., & Ziegelmeyer, A. (2011). Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance. Theory and Decisions, 70(1), 45–64. CrossRef
- Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 522–550. CrossRef
- Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: old age pension and intra-household allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review, 17, 1–25. CrossRef
- Eliaz, K., Raj, D., & Razin, R. (2006). Choice shifts in groups: a decision-theoretic basis. American Economic Review, 96, 1321–1332. CrossRef
- Guo, Z. L., & Bernstein, T. P. (2004). The impact of election on the village structure of power: the relation between village committees and the party branches. Journal of Contemporary China, 13, 257–275. CrossRef
- Hannum, E. (2005). Market transition, educational disparities, and family strategies in rural China: new evidence on gender stratification and development. Demography, 42, 275–299. CrossRef
- Harrison, G. W., Morten, I. L., Rutström, E. E., & Tarazona-Gómez, M. (2005). Preferences over social risk. Unpublished Manuscript.
- He, H., Martinsson, P., & Sutter, M. (2012). Group decision making under risk: An experiment with student couples. Economics Letters, 117, 691–693. CrossRef
- Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92, 1644–1655. CrossRef
- Kachelmeier, S., & Shehata, M. (1992). Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: experimental evidence from the People’s Republic of China. American Economic Review, 82, 1120–1141.
- Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. A., & Wales, T. J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the U.K. child benefit. Journal of Human Resources, 22, 463–480. CrossRef
- Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 139–158. CrossRef
- Masclet, D., Colombier, N., Denant-Boemont, L., & Loheac, Y. (2009). Group and individual risk preferences: a lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 470–484. CrossRef
- Mazzocco, M. (2004). Savings, risk sharing and preferences for risk. American Economic Review, 94, 1169–1182. CrossRef
- NBS (2008). China statistical yearbooks. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.
- Peters, E. A., Ünür, S., Clark, J., & Schulze, W. D. (2004). Free-riding and the provision of public goods in the family: a laboratory experiment. International Economic Review, 45, 283–299. CrossRef
- Phipps, S., & Burton, P. (1998). What’s mine is yours? The influence of male and female income on pattern of household expenditure. Economica, 65, 599–613. CrossRef
- Qian, N. (2008). Missing women and the price of tea in China: the effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1251–1285. CrossRef
- Rockenbach, B., Sadrich, A., & Mathauschek, B. (2007). Teams take the better risks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63, 412–442. CrossRef
- Shupp, R. S., & Williams, A. W. (2008). Risk preference differentials of small groups and individuals. Economic Journal, 118, 258–283. CrossRef
- Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review, 100, 557–571. CrossRef
- Thomas, D. (1994). Like father, like son: like mother, like daughter: parental resources and child height. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 950–988. CrossRef
- Vermeulen, F. (2002). Collective household models: principles and main results. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(4), 533–564. CrossRef
- Zhang, J., & Casari, M. (2011). How groups reach agreement in risky choices: an experiment. Economic Inquiry, 50(2), 502–515. CrossRef
- The influence of spouses on household decision making under risk: an experiment in rural China
Volume 16, Issue 3 , pp 383-401
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Household decision making
- Experiment in the field
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 2. School of Economics, Renmin University of China, 100872, Beijing, China
- 3. Department of Public Finance, University of Innsbruck, Universitaetsstrasse 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria