Two heads are less bubbly than one: team decision-making in an experimental asset market
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In the world of mutual funds management, responsibility for investment decisions is increasingly entrusted to small teams instead of individuals. Yet the effect of team decision-making in a market environment has never been studied in a controlled experiment. In this paper, we investigate the effect of team decision-making in an asset market experiment that has long been known to reliably generate price bubbles and crashes in markets populated by individuals. We find that this tendency is substantially reduced when each decision-making unit is instead a team of two. This holds across a broad spectrum of measures of the severity of mispricing, both under a continuous double-auction institution and in a call market. The result is not driven by reduced turnover due to time required for deliberation by teams, and continues to hold even when subjects are experienced. Our result also holds not only when our teams treatments are compared to the ‘narrow’ baseline provided by the corresponding individuals treatments, but also when compared more broadly to the results of the large body of previous research on markets of this kind.
- Ackert, L. F., & Church, B. K. (2001). The effects of subject pool and design experience on rationality in experimental asset markets. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(1), 6–28. CrossRef
- Baker, R. J. I., Laury, S. K., & Williams, A. W. (2008). Comparing small-group and individual behavior in lottery-choice experiments. Southern Economic Journal, 75(2), 367–382.
- Bär, M., Ciccotello, C. S., & Ruenzi, S. (2010). Risk management and team-managed mutual funds. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 4(1), 57–73.
- Bär, M., Kempf, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2011). Is a team different from the sum of its parts? Evidence from mutual fund managers. Review of Finance, 15(2), 359–396. CrossRef
- Blinder, A. S., & Morgan, J. (2005). Are two heads better than one? Monetary policy by committee. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37(5), 789–811. CrossRef
- Bliss, R. T., Potter, M. E., & Schwarz, C. (2008). Performance characteristics of individually-managed versus team-managed funds. Journal of Portfolio Management, 34(3), 110–118. CrossRef
- Bone, J., Hey, J., & Suckling, J. (1999). Are groups more (or less) consistent than individuals? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18(1), 63–81. CrossRef
- Caginalp, G., Porter, D. P., & Smith, V. L. (1998). Initial cash/asset ratio and asset prices: An experimental study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(2), 756–761. CrossRef
- Caginalp, G., Porter, D. P., & Smith, V. L. (2001). Financial bubbles: Excess cash, momentum, and incomplete information. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(2), 80–99. CrossRef
- Casari, M., Zhang, J., & Jackson, C. (2010). Do groups fall prey to the winner’s curse? Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
- Charness, G., Karni, E., & Levin, D. (2007). Individual and group decision making under risk: An experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35(2), 129–148. CrossRef
- Cooper, D. J., & Kagel, J. H. (2005). Are two heads better than one: Team versus individual play in signaling games. American Economic Review, 95(3), 477–509. CrossRef
- Cox, J. C., & Hayne, S. C. (2006). Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents? Experimental Economics, 9(3), 209–222. CrossRef
- Davies, T. (2006). Irrational gloominess in the laboratory. University of Arizona.
- Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178. CrossRef
- Haruvy, E. E., & Noussair, C. N. (2006). The effect of short selling on bubbles and crashes in experimental spot asset markets. The Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1119–1157. CrossRef
- Haruvy, E. E., Lahav, Y., & Noussair, C. N. (2007). Traders’ expectations in asset markets: Experimental evidence. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1901–1920. CrossRef
- Haruvy, E. E., Noussair, C. N., & Powell, O. (2009). The impact of asset repurchases and issues in an experimental market. Tilburg University.
- Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. CrossRef
- Hussam, R. N., Porter, D. P., & Smith, V. L. (2008). Thar she blows: Can bubbles be rekindled with experienced subjects? American Economic Review, 98(3), 924–937. CrossRef
- Kachelmeier, S. J., & Shehata, M. (1992). Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People’s Republic of China. American Economic Review, 82(5), 1120–1141.
- King, R. R., Smith, V. L., Williams, A. W., & Boening, M. V. (1993). The robustness of bubbles and crashes in experimental markets. In R. H. Day & P. Chen (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics and evolutionary economics (pp. 183–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2005). The decision maker matters: Individual versus group behaviour in experimental ‘beauty-contest’ games. Economic Journal, 115(500), 200–223. CrossRef
- Palan, S. (2009). Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems: Vol. 626. Bubbles and crashes in experimental asset markets. Heidelberg: Springer. CrossRef
- Porter, D. P., & Smith, V. L. (1994). Stock market bubbles in the laboratory. Applied Mathematical Finance, 1(4), 111–127. CrossRef
- Porter, D. P., & Smith, V. L. (1995). Futures contracting and dividend uncertainty in experimental asset markets. Journal of Business, 68(4), 509–541. CrossRef
- Rockenbach, B., Sadrieh, A., & Mathauschek, B. (2007). Teams take the better risks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(3), 412–422. CrossRef
- Samuelson, W. F., & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). The winner’s curse in bilateral negotiations. In V. L. Smith (Ed.), Research in Experimental Economics (Vol. 3). Greenwich: JAI Press.
- Shupp, R. S., & Williams, A. W. (2008). Risk preference differentials of small groups and individuals. Economic Journal, 118(525), 258–283. CrossRef
- Smith, V. L., Suchanek, G. L., & Williams, A. W. (1988). Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica, 56(5), 1119–1151. CrossRef
- Smith, V. L., van Boening, M. V., & Wellford, C. P. (2000). Dividend timing and behavior in laboratory asset markets. Economic Theory, 16(3), 567–583.
- van Boening, M. V., Williams, A. W., & LaMaster, S. (1993). Price bubbles and crashes in experimental call markets. Economics Letters, 41(2), 179–185. CrossRef
- van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 449–472. CrossRef
- Two heads are less bubbly than one: team decision-making in an experimental asset market
Volume 15, Issue 3 , pp 373-397
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Group decision-making
- Price bubbles
- Asset market experiments
- Industry Sectors