Date: 13 Jul 2010
An experimental analysis of team production in networks
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Experimental and empirical evidence highlights the role of networks on social outcomes. This paper tests the properties of exogenously fixed networks in team production. Subjects make the same decisions in a team work environment under four different organizational networks: the line, the circle, the star, and the complete network. In all the networks, links make information available to neighbors. This design allows us to analyze decisions across networks and a variety of subject types in a standard linear team production game. Contribution levels differ significantly across networks and the star is the most efficient incomplete network. Moreover, our results suggest that subjects act as conditional cooperators with respect to the information received from the network.
Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1605–1623. CrossRef
Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K., & Ott, M. (2006). A network experiment in continuous time: the influence of link costs. Experimental Economics, 9, 237–251. CrossRef
Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K., Ott, M., & Vogt, B. (2007). Evolution of networks—an experimental analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 317–347. CrossRef
Callander, S., & Plott, C. R. (2005). Principles of network development and evolution: an experimental study. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1469–1495. CrossRef
Carpenter, J. P. (2007). Punishing free-riders: how group size affects mutual monitoring and the provision of public goods. Games and Economic Behavior, 60, 31–55. CrossRef
Cason, T., & Khan, F. (1999). A laboratory study of voluntary public goods provision with imperfect monitoring and communication. Journal of Development Economics, 58, 533–552. CrossRef
Cassar, A. (2007). Coordination and cooperation in local, random and small world networks: experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 58, 209–230. CrossRef
Choi, S., Gale, D., & Kariv, S. (2005). Behavioral aspects of learning in social networks: an experimental study. In J. Morgan (Ed.) Behavioral and experimental economics: Vol. 13. Advances in applied microeconomics.
Croson, R., & Marks, M. (1998). Identifiability of individual contributions in a threshold public goods experiment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 167–190. CrossRef
Deck, C., & Johnson, C. (2004). Link bidding in a laboratory experiment. Review of Economic Design, 8(4), 359–372. CrossRef
Eckel, C., Fatas, E., & Wilson, R. (2009, forthcoming). An experimental analysis of status in organizations. Journal of Public Economic Theory.
Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2003). It’s all about connections: evidence on network formation (IZA discussion paper no. 777).
Fatas, E., Godoy, S., & Solaz, H. (2009). Low powered monitoring systems in team production: an experimental analysis (LINEEX working paper). University of Valencia.
Fatas, E., Meléndez-Jiménez, M. A., & Solaz, H. (2008). Cooperation, punishment and networks (Mimeo). LINEEX.
Fatas, E., Meléndez-Jiménez, M. A., & Solaz, H. (2010). An experimental analysis of team production in networks (Discussion Papers in Economic Behaviour 2010-03). ERICES (available at http://www.erices.es/upload/workingpaper/6_0310.pdf).
Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178. CrossRef
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economic Letters, 71(3), 397–404. CrossRef
Fox, J., & Guyer, M. (1978). Public choice and cooperation in n-person prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22(3), 469–481. CrossRef
Gachter, S., Fehr, E., & Kment, C. (1996). Does social exchange increase voluntary cooperation? Kyklos, 49(4), 541–554. CrossRef
Goyal, S. (2005). Learning in networks. In G. Demange & M. Wooders (Eds.), Group formation in economics: networks, clubs and coalitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, M. O. (2005). A survey of network formation models: stability and efficiency. In: G. Demange & M. Wooders (Eds.), Group formation in economics: networks, clubs and coalitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirchkamp, O., & Nagel, R. (2007). Naive learning and cooperation in network experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 58, 269–292. CrossRef
Kosfeld, M. (2004). Economic networks in the laboratory: a survey. Review of Network Economics, 3, 20–41. CrossRef
Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In A. Roth & J. Kagel (Eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22. CrossRef
Riedl, A., & Ule, A. (2002). Exclusion and cooperation in social network experiments (Mimeo). University of Amsterdam.
Zelmer, J. (2003). Linear public goods experiments: a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 6(3), 299–310. CrossRef
- An experimental analysis of team production in networks
Volume 13, Issue 4 , pp 399-411
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Team production
- Industry Sectors